|
|
Post by bad guy™ on Feb 11, 2016 19:06:33 GMT -5
Brock Lesnar was champion for 7 months and defended it twice. This "rule" only counts when they want it to based on the storyline. And this has been Lozo spittin' hot truth. |
|
|
|
Post by tylerbreezee on Feb 11, 2016 19:23:48 GMT -5
I feel like that hasn't been a thing since like 2004
|
|
|
|
Post by knupmc on Feb 11, 2016 19:38:32 GMT -5
Last time I remember wwe using this storyline was back when sheamus was champ in 2010 I think. Seems they use this rule when applicable
|
|
ellisd
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 26, 2009 0:30:49 GMT -5
Posts: 4,758
|
Post by ellisd on Feb 11, 2016 23:31:28 GMT -5
Hey, you can't prove that Triple H isn't defending it at a random house show. I hear they may be running a show in Rio De Janeiro, which is ironically the place where they held the tournament to crown the first Intercontinental Champion. ;-)
|
|
|
|
Post by c-scope on Feb 11, 2016 23:34:23 GMT -5
The last time i remember them even mentioning this rule was in 2010 when sheamus defended it on raw to try to get out of defending it at night of champions.
|
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Feb 12, 2016 15:43:47 GMT -5
Because Triple H is the boss and doesn't feel like defending it.
Think of it this way: the rule says you have to be able to defend it within 30 days. It doesn't say you actually have to defend it.
|
|
