|
|
Post by Dan on Mar 17, 2016 6:54:49 GMT -5
You are right Survivor Series would've been a great spot for a turn and eliminated all the Sheamus bs. But who would have been the big baby face to fight Reigns at Mania? Ambrose. It made perfect sense. Reigns with the Authority could have held down Ambrose at TLC. Then at the Rumble, Dean goes the distance and the crowd goes crazy. They could have done Dean/Reigns for the title, Wyatt/HHH, Lesnar/Owens, Shane/Taker, and most of the other garbage they are filling the card up with currently. Not going to lie, I would be pretty hyped up for those matches over what we have now. I would have slow burned the Reigns turn even longer. Simply put, Roman Reigns should have retired Undertaker at Wrestlemania 32 cementing him as the biggest heel in the Company in the process. Ambrose could have won the Title against Triple H in the Main Event, he'd carry enough steam as a babyface Champion for a few months until Rollins returns who will undoubtedly return with the closest babyface reaction to when Triple H returned at MSG in 2002. That's what the big problem is going to be here with the Reigns project anyway. As soon as Rollins returns, he's going to be hot as hell and they'll have no choice but to get the Title that he never lost back on him. Plus, with Reigns going through the year as a monster heel, he's more likely to end up naturally becoming babyface that way. It would all lead to a Shield Triple Threat for the Title at Wrestlemania 33 with Roman Reigns as the biggest heel, Rollins as the biggest face, and MITB holder Ambrose already having a Wrestlemania Main Event under his belt. |
|
|
|
Post by bigshab421 on Mar 17, 2016 8:54:05 GMT -5
Ambrose. It made perfect sense. Reigns with the Authority could have held down Ambrose at TLC. Then at the Rumble, Dean goes the distance and the crowd goes crazy. They could have done Dean/Reigns for the title, Wyatt/HHH, Lesnar/Owens, Shane/Taker, and most of the other garbage they are filling the card up with currently. Not going to lie, I would be pretty hyped up for those matches over what we have now. I would have slow burned the Reigns turn even longer. Simply put, Roman Reigns should have retired Undertaker at Wrestlemania 32 cementing him as the biggest heel in the Company in the process. Ambrose could have won the Title against Triple H in the Main Event, he'd carry enough steam as a babyface Champion for a few months until Rollins returns who will undoubtedly return with the closest babyface reaction to when Triple H returned at MSG in 2002. That's what the big problem is going to be here with the Reigns project anyway. As soon as Rollins returns, he's going to be hot as hell and they'll have no choice but to get the Title that he never lost back on him. Plus, with Reigns going through the year as a monster heel, he's more likely to end up naturally becoming babyface that way. It would all lead to a Shield Triple Threat for the Title at Wrestlemania 33 with Roman Reigns as the biggest heel, Rollins as the biggest face, and MITB holder Ambrose already having a Wrestlemania Main Event under his belt. Here is how you map that out: Reigns wins the title at WrestleMania. Reigns defeats HHH again at Payback. From there Ambrose is wanting to challenge Reigns for the title but the Authority won't let it happen. Ambrose wins a beat the clock tournament to face Reigns at Extreme Rules in a No Holds Barred Match. At the end of the match Reigns gets hit with Dirty Deeds and then as he is about to win the title, HHH comes down to beat up Ambrose. He hits Dean with the sledge and Pedigree and puts Roman's arm over him for the pinfall. The next night on Raw Reigns confronts him and is pissed. But he says "Its all best for business," and Roman/HHH laugh and hug. Ambrose comes out and HHH/Roman deny him another title match. Ambrose earns his spot in the MITB Ladder Match and wins. SummerSlam is set up for Reigns(c)/Rollins and HHH/Ambrose. Reigns continues to win with dirty finishes and help from HHH/Steph. Eventually you have HHH/Rollins at Survivor Series and then Rollins wins the Rumble and Ambrose announces he will add himself to the main event by cashing in MITB. Boom, your SHIELD Triple Threat is booked. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 16:25:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2016 11:22:56 GMT -5
Roman Reigns beating Undertaker at WrestleMania is the most ludicrous idea that I have ever seen. The fans already mostly hate him anyway. He has no business pinning Undertaker at Mania. Quite frankly, no one does. Not even Brock even though he did.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Mar 17, 2016 12:08:34 GMT -5
Reigns is walking out of WM with the WWE title confetti and all. The sooner people accept that, the more youll enjoy the show for what it is.
|
|
|
|
Post by bigshab421 on Mar 17, 2016 12:24:06 GMT -5
Reigns is walking out of WM with the WWE title confetti and all. The sooner people accept that, the more youll enjoy the show for what it is. I have accepted it long ago but it doesn't mean I am going to enjoy it. I hate when people talk condescending like that. I've enjoyed most shows recently until it gets to Reigns. It is not that I hate the guy or anything. I find him bland and generic, but I find myself hating the booking of him. And quite frankly it soils a good part of the show. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 16:25:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2016 12:37:22 GMT -5
Reigns is walking out of WM with the WWE title confetti and all. The sooner people accept that, the more youll enjoy the show for what it is. I can deal with that result... As long as Shane walks out of that Cell with his hand raised. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 16:25:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2016 13:15:23 GMT -5
I have been thinking HHH will win this match, but, now that I'm convinced Shane is winning I think Roman will also, thus ending the Authority going forward.
Every time Vince comes out he tells us what will happen if Shane wins. Very specific things, leading me to believe that that is indeed what will happen by giving us a huge reason to get behind Shane. It will no doubt be sprinkled with run-ins, weapons and the like, but I'm expecting a great traditional token Wrestlemania match with all the bells and whistles.
With Shane in charge, I think they'll dub it a new era, bringing in the new guys, and new feuds etc to create a fresh buzz.
Ultimately, having listened to what the fans want and done something about it, despite what people say.
|
|
|
|
Post by bad guy™ on Mar 17, 2016 15:30:51 GMT -5
I have been thinking HHH will win this match, but, now that I'm convinced Shane is winning I think Roman will also, thus ending the Authority going forward. Every time Vince comes out he tells us what will happen if Shane wins. Very specific things, leading me to believe that that is indeed what will happen by giving us a huge reason to get behind Shane. It will no doubt be sprinkled with run-ins, weapons and the like, but I'm expecting a great traditional token Wrestlemania match with all the bells and whistles. With Shane in charge, I think they'll dub it a new era, bringing in the new guys, and new feuds etc to create a fresh buzz. Ultimately, having listened to what the fans want and done something about it, despite what people say. That'd be nice, if the way you're thinking is correct. |
|
|
|
Post by Quanthor on Mar 17, 2016 16:13:45 GMT -5
Might be the most inept and nonsensical build to a Mania in a very long time.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 16:25:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2016 17:26:06 GMT -5
The Authority will be around until the second coming of Seth Rollins.
|
|
|
|
Post by tylerbreezee on Mar 18, 2016 7:30:06 GMT -5
The Authority will be around until the second coming of Seth Rollins. If Rollins doesn't get 2007 style Triple H return packages saying "We can rebuild him" I'll be mad. I'll be even more mad if we don't get fat Seth Rollins when he returns |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 16:25:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2016 9:37:38 GMT -5
Reigns is walking out of WM with the WWE title confetti and all. The sooner people accept that, the more youll enjoy the show for what it is. I can deal with that result... As long as Shane walks out of that Cell with his hand raised. No No No Jamie No |
|
|
|
Post by bigshab421 on Mar 18, 2016 11:21:52 GMT -5
I can deal with that result... As long as Shane walks out of that Cell with his hand raised. No No No Jamie No As much as I don't want to see Undertaker's legacy desecrated by 2 unecessary losses, this would make no sense if they brought back Shane for this story and match, just to have him lose. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 16:25:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2016 11:24:56 GMT -5
As much as I don't want to see Undertaker's legacy desecrated by 2 unecessary losses, this would make no sense if they brought back Shane for this story and match, just to have him lose. The match itself barely makes sense. WWE's booking hardly makes sense. Shane was likely the only "WOW" option to face Taker this year since Cena was injured. Taker shouldn't even have 1 loss. Two would be one of the stupidest things WWE could do unless it's Taker's final match. And Shane McMahon isn't the guy to retire Undertaker. Shane can't even cut a decent promo. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 16:25:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2016 12:17:36 GMT -5
I can deal with that result... As long as Shane walks out of that Cell with his hand raised. No No No Jamie No Yes Yes Yes Catfish Yes |
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Mar 18, 2016 13:44:32 GMT -5
Shane McMahon interests me.
The Undertaker hasn't for a while.
Therefore, I'm pulling for Shane.
|
|
|
|
Post by 5th Horsewoman on Mar 18, 2016 14:01:31 GMT -5
Take it for what it's worth.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 16:25:43 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2016 14:09:25 GMT -5
Good lord, Shane McMahon beating the Undertaker is going to happen isn't it?
How far we've fallen.
|
|
AJ F'n Brooks
Main Eventer
Thank You AJ Lee!
Joined on: Jan 1, 2013 8:57:26 GMT -5
Posts: 1,288
|
Post by AJ F'n Brooks on Mar 18, 2016 14:59:31 GMT -5
Take it for what it's worth. What's the source? I find that really hard to believe. I'm like 99,9% sure Triple H vs Roman Reigns is the main event. I mean...  It's everywhere. |
|
@brit_figs
Main Eventer
WF 10 Year Member
Joined on: Sept 25, 2009 13:02:15 GMT -5
Posts: 3,774
|
Post by @brit_figs on Mar 18, 2016 16:43:14 GMT -5
Why is Dudleys/Uso on the main card?
Surely that should be the pre show if anything?
|
|
