Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 18:20:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2016 8:09:27 GMT -5
Why is Dudleys/Uso on the main card? Surely that should be the pre show if anything? As much as I love the Dudleys, I have to agree. This is a glorified RAW filler match at best.
|
|
|
Post by tylerbreezee on Mar 19, 2016 13:18:42 GMT -5
Remember when Wrestlemania rewind was a thing and we got Wrestlemania rematches leading up to Mania. We can't even get a single rematch from last year or 30 because everyone has been part time, is injured, or retired. Pretty sad
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 18:20:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2016 13:48:21 GMT -5
Remember when Wrestlemania rewind was a thing and we got Wrestlemania rematches leading up to Mania. We can't even get a single rematch from last year or 30 because everyone has been part time, is injured, or retired. Pretty sad I used to love it when they did that.
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Mar 19, 2016 20:16:51 GMT -5
Taker vs Shane should close the card. Especially if they're going to go with Reigns clean over H with no twist. If control of the company is on the line, it's bigger than the world title.
There is no way in hell Ambrose vs Brock should even be in the conversation to close, which is why that's probably nonsense. If Vince wanted Brock to main event, he should have put the title on Ambrose.
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Mar 20, 2016 7:24:09 GMT -5
Surely they can't even contemplate having Brock Lesnar vs Dean Ambrose close the Show. If they're going to do this, they might as well of just had Ambrose win the Title against Triple H, or even put the Title on Lesnar and had a David vs Goliath style Match, with Triple H vs Reigns being a grudge Match. Jesus.
|
|
|
Post by bigshab421 on Mar 20, 2016 14:27:46 GMT -5
Taker vs Shane should close the card. Especially if they're going to go with Reigns clean over H with no twist. If control of the company is on the line, it's bigger than the world title. There is no way in hell Ambrose vs Brock should even be in the conversation to close, which is why that's probably nonsense. If Vince wanted Brock to main event, he should have put the title on Ambrose.
|
|
johnnyaustin21
Main Eventer
Joined on: Nov 21, 2011 14:16:20 GMT -5
Posts: 1,609
|
Post by johnnyaustin21 on Mar 20, 2016 15:11:48 GMT -5
Taker vs Shane should close the card. Especially if they're going to go with Reigns clean over H with no twist. If control of the company is on the line, it's bigger than the world title. There is no way in hell Ambrose vs Brock should even be in the conversation to close, which is why that's probably nonsense. If Vince wanted Brock to main event, he should have put the title on Ambrose. Agreed to me I have and always will feel that the biggest possible match should always close the show be it Wrestlemania or any other show,and the biggest match on the card and the one thats the most interesting is Taker/Shane for what's basically control of the company.As you stated control of the company is more important then the world title and also I would assume that the fan base in Jerry's world will be more interested and have a positive reaction no matter who wins then what will be the case of Triple H/Reigns and this coming from a die hard mark of both men. Taker/Shane close this Wrestlemania just like Hogan/Rock should have closed X8,Austin/Rock(rumored to close XIX before Austin health issue the night before) or Hogan/McMahon should have close XIX and lastly HBK/Taker at WM XXV.
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Mar 20, 2016 17:01:37 GMT -5
Surely they can't even contemplate having Brock Lesnar vs Dean Ambrose close the Show. If they're going to do this, they might as well of just had Ambrose win the Title against Triple H, or even put the Title on Lesnar and had a David vs Goliath style Match, with Triple H vs Reigns being a grudge Match. Jesus. Triple H Vs Reigns should have been a grudge match from the get go. Hell, fans would probably not be hating on Reigns as much if it wasnt for the title. Triple H/Reigns have actual beef with each other (kayfabe, obviously) which should be enough for a match and Ambrose/Lesnar have literally nothing to be fighting over, unless it was for the WWE Championship. I cant believe they ed this up as bad as they have.
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Mar 20, 2016 17:36:28 GMT -5
Ambrose/Lesnar for the title wouldve made SO much more sense as a main event. HHH/Reigns was a suppose to be a grudge match from the very start. Why this is a WM main event for the title absolutely baffles me.
Its 2 weeks until showtime and i still dont have an ounce of excitement in me.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 18:20:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2016 3:17:00 GMT -5
Ambrose/Lesnar for the title wouldve made SO much more sense as a main event. HHH/Reigns was a suppose to be a grudge match from the very start. Why this is a WM main event for the title absolutely baffles me. Its 2 weeks until showtime and i still dont have an ounce of excitement in me. I'm honestly more excited for the raw the night after, than I am for Mania.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 18:20:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2016 5:39:54 GMT -5
Ambrose/Lesnar for the title wouldve made SO much more sense as a main event. HHH/Reigns was a suppose to be a grudge match from the very start. Why this is a WM main event for the title absolutely baffles me. Its 2 weeks until showtime and i still dont have an ounce of excitement in me. I'm honestly more excited for the raw the night after, than I am for Mania. Shane's first night on the job? Yeah, I'm pretty excited for that too!
|
|
E N I G M A
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 4, 2010 5:21:31 GMT -5
Posts: 2,649
|
Post by E N I G M A on Mar 21, 2016 6:33:18 GMT -5
I'm split on this year's WM. There are some matches that I'm really looking forward to like Shane/Taker and Ambrose/Lesnar, but there are also a lot of matches that don't get my interest AT ALL, with the most obvious one being the ME. Another thing that bugs me is the fact that they didn't do a multiman TLC/whatever match for the TagTitles.... I mean, is it really that hard to book? New Day vs Dudleys vs LoN vs Usos. You could literally have the SAME build they're doing right now, you would just have to switch the teams a bit & replace LoN with Dudleys/Usos in the NewDay's promos. Then again, there are matches like the DivasTitle match that could be great when given enough time. Y2JvsAJ falls into the same category, I hope they get some kind of gimmick/stipulation AND some time, cause I have no desire to see a match like their first one only with Styles winning with the StylesClash this time.
And don't get me started on the fact that Bray Wyatt doesn't have a match on the main card.
|
|
|
Post by bigshab421 on Mar 21, 2016 7:03:35 GMT -5
If Jericho/Styles is a straight up, no stipulation matchup, I am calling it now that Styles wins by reversing a top rope Frankensteiner into a Styles Clash off the top.
|
|
trukid
Main Eventer
Joined on: Dec 5, 2006 10:09:56 GMT -5
Posts: 2,155
|
Post by trukid on Mar 21, 2016 21:44:19 GMT -5
Looks like its nodqamania this year
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Mar 22, 2016 3:25:22 GMT -5
So i'm guessing Shane/Taker is the main event now?
WWE is flip flopping more than a Big Show face/heel turn when it comes to building this WM.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 18:20:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 22, 2016 4:05:58 GMT -5
Man, regardless of what others think, I'm looking forward to Mania more than basically anything else in my life right now. I always do.
|
|
|
Post by bigshab421 on Mar 22, 2016 6:56:22 GMT -5
Man, regardless of what others think, I'm looking forward to Mania more than basically anything else in my life right now. I always do. I would say that normally but Pittsburgh Pirates opening day game is 1:05 the same day as Mania and I have tickets to that, so Mania is basically taking a back seat to baseball this year......atleast until I get back from the game
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 1, 2024 18:20:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 22, 2016 8:42:12 GMT -5
I agree with punksnotdead
Taker/Shane should close the show. Control of company vs End of Undertaker? That's bigger than anything going on in the company. Even the title - only because of who's fighting for it
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Mar 22, 2016 8:53:23 GMT -5
When you'd rather shoehorn people onto the card than book an actual story.
|
|
|
Post by bigshab421 on Mar 22, 2016 9:46:43 GMT -5
When you'd rather shoehorn people onto the card than book an actual story. Ryder makes it into this match somehow, but Tyler Breeze will probably be the first one out f the ATGMBR....... perplexing to say the least. Imagine this match if the injured midcarders are healthy: Owens (c) v. Zayn v. Cesaro v. Neville v. Ziggler v. Miz v. Stardust Ahhh what could have been, or you know...... Just book Owens v Zayn and let the other scrubs scrap it out in the battle royale
|
|