|
|
Post by K5 on Mar 22, 2016 23:19:43 GMT -5
people love to lip off russo, but all anyone seems to be able to think of to 'make' these matches at wrestlemania are dusty finishes.
i don't want interference at wrestlemania in any of the big matches. takes away, does not add unless they're just there to bump (arn anderson at x8, ryno/lita/spike at x7, etc)
|
|
|
|
Post by KrimV on Mar 23, 2016 2:35:24 GMT -5
If anyone else should beat Taker, let it be Sting...please? This. Sting has been saying in recent days that he isn't quite retired. I could see Sting interfering in the last minutes of the bout with his trusty baseball bat, laying Undertaker out, and setting the stage for their final career match next year. |
|
|
|
Post by ~ Cymru ~ on Mar 23, 2016 5:50:29 GMT -5
 Streak is over its not been about the streak for a while now. Theres clearly going to be more to this angle with all the stipulations, and the way they've been hinting at conflict between Vince and Taker. I never said anything about the streak, I meant the fact that he always appears at Wrestlemania every year will be over. When you said run, I assumed you meant streak as they're two in the same, my bad. I fully expect Undertaker to loose due to interference, his last match will be a screw job, he cant go out like that, he'll get a match at Mania 33 with whoever screws him at Mania 32, Win, go out a hero. Streak is over its not been about the streak for a while now. Theres clearly going to be more to this angle with all the stipulations, and the way they've been hinting at conflict between Vince and Taker. You don't think I know he lost? He's my favorite of all time so I'm well aware. Him losing once was foolish. But he lost once. It needs to stay that way. He doesn't need a second loss, especially to a guy who is 45 and isn't even a wrestler. It does nothing for anyone. Oh, and neither of us mentioned the streak. You brought it up. This loss would result in The Authority losing control of raw, not seeing Triple H and Steph open raw with a long ass promo every week. It wont do anything for Undertaker but set up a feud for next year, rather than these last few years where Undertaker has had a spontaneous 3 week feud before Mania just to say he's had a match. for the first time in 4(?) years Undertaker will have a decent storyline going into mania. As for Shane a victory here and he'll get control of raw. I didnt want the Undertaker to loose at mania, but now he has, the canvas is plain, free for mad crap to happen. Edit: just realised how fukt my ability to quote is, apologies. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 21:32:57 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2016 9:13:21 GMT -5
I want HHH to help Shane.
Yeah, they could reveal the next night that it was a conspiracy between HHH and Shane to get Raw away from Vince and make it more like NXT.
This would cause trouble in HHH and Stephanie's marriage which I think would make for good TV.
|
|
HTMN
Superstar
Joined on: Oct 24, 2013 15:42:13 GMT -5
Posts: 849 
|
Post by HTMN on Mar 23, 2016 11:15:55 GMT -5
Could the Wyatts help Shane?
Bray slapped HHH in the face at the rumble. The Wyatts aren't on anyone's side. This could lead to a massiv Wyatt push with Shane on their side.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 21:32:57 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2016 22:59:33 GMT -5
Wouldn't be right if the mean street posse didn't appear to help Shane
|
|
|
|
Post by Odafin Tutuola on Mar 23, 2016 23:12:15 GMT -5
My main problem with this match is that you put two stipulations on top another makes the match  ing horrible, I don't see Roman Reigns running in and turning heel. I hope this match doesn't close out the show of shows. |
|
China Claus
Main Eventer
I can feeel your sensitivity
Joined on: Apr 17, 2012 20:05:15 GMT -5
Posts: 2,737
|
Post by China Claus on Mar 23, 2016 23:59:59 GMT -5
A Shane-O-Mac win over Undertaker at Wrestlemania is probably one of the most ridiculous things ever. Even if the whole locker room interfered, I wouldn't buy it.
I mean, c'mon. The only men to beat Taker at Wrestlemania in 24 years, Bock Lesnar, and Shane Freaking McMahon?
It kills me to even think about it...
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Mar 24, 2016 6:46:27 GMT -5
If that was the case they might aswell of had Roman retire the Undertaker one on one. The more I think about this Shane vs Undertaker Match, the more I can't help but think Shane is going to turn Heel during the Match and align with Vince in an attempt to get rid of the Undertaker and have total control of the Company, with Sting, Cena, or Austin making the save for Taker. The Match is going to be fun, entertaining, and have some big spots, it's going to be like Triple H vs Sting from last year, so it wouldn't surprise me if they're going to end up doing something like this. I just hope we don't see Shane win only to re-instate Undertaker the next night on Raw.
|
|
|
|
Post by MADNESS_NH_97 on Mar 25, 2016 12:07:28 GMT -5
The only people that should interfere are Finn Bálor, Karl Anderson & DOC Gallows.
|
|
dadlife316
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Feb 27, 2016 23:50:24 GMT -5
Posts: 131
|
Post by dadlife316 on Mar 25, 2016 19:56:12 GMT -5
This match is going to have more run ins than the Sting / HHH match last year. I see the end result is Cena helping Shane win and a brand split.
If the Bulletproof Balor Club interfered, and I don't see that happening in this match, it would be on HHHs side. We're in the reality era. Balor is tight with H and everyone who follows him or WWE on social media knows it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Mar 25, 2016 20:23:34 GMT -5
I would be fine with the idea of Reigns helping Shane to beat Taker,its makes sense but I think the better option even if they want to turn Reigns heel is to go the John Cena route. The WWE was already dead set on Cena/Taker for this years Mania as the marquee match up why not have Cena cost Taker the match to set up a bout at next years Mania and also in the process turn Cena full blow heel if Reigns is going to be the #1 babyface or even if they don't want Cena to go full on heel it would add a new twist to him as a character. Well if Undertaker loses he can't wrestle at Mania anymore so it wouldn't make much sense for Cena to screw him so that he could fight him at Mania. |
|
|
|
Post by Darkhawk on Mar 25, 2016 20:47:33 GMT -5
Sting needs to be the one to interfere and cost Undertaker the win.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 21:32:57 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 26, 2016 9:37:17 GMT -5
A Shane-O-Mac win over Undertaker at Wrestlemania is probably one of the most ridiculous things ever. Even if the whole locker room interfered, I wouldn't buy it. I mean, c'mon. The only men to beat Taker at Wrestlemania in 24 years, Bock Lesnar, and Shane Freaking McMahon? It kills me to even think about it... I'm glad someone gets it. |
|
