Womens Royal Rumble?

Would be ok with me if it was kept to a reasonable length, aka 30 minutes or so.

Also if they have a women's Rumble I feel like that should be the only womens match on the card. Theres no way you can fit:

— Mens rumble
— Two world title matches
— At least one tag title match
— At least one US or IC title match
— A Womens rumble, and two womens title matches.

Even for a four hour show thats really pushing it.

Meh not really a fan of the idea. The Women's division has been given great opportunities recently being involved in Hell in a Cell, No DQ, Tables and Iron Man matches but I don't think they need a Royal Rumble, at least not yet. Plus I'm really enjoying the SmackDown women feuds such as Alexa Bliss/Becky Lynch & Nicki Bella/Carmella/Natalya and would like to see some of those do their own thing at the Rumble. The RAW Women's division could do with a shake up though because I feel like Ive been watching Sasha Banks vs. Charlotte since August 🙄

Throw in a cruiserweight and tag-team one while we're at it. No need to over saturate the rumble.
If it was a 10 woman, 5 from each brand or something like that, I wouldn't mind it but on the same night as the actual rumble and two world championship matches? Naaaaa

I think a second Royal Rumble match for the females is not only due and well deserving of the spot light, but I think with the 20 females on the roster who do not currently have a Championship Title Belt, plus 10 more non-WWE (Raw, Smackdown, NXT) female talents would be a spectacle to see. They can always cut down the time between entrants to a minute, making it a 30 to 40 minute match. I bet no one would leave to use the restroom if the Women had their own Royal Rumble match. We're talking about the Royal Rumble match. How much skill is needed to enter the ring, wrestle around for a few minutes, and then get tossed out?? If the women of the WWE can't execute being thrown out over the top, or in this case, we can make it between the top and middle rope, then maybe they shouldn't be in the WWE at all.

Picture this. Nia Jax is entrant number 1, and just eliminates everyone one at a time. Just imagine the next night on Raw, both the Raw Women's Champion, Sash Banks, and the Smackdown Women's Champion, Alexa Bliss are in the ring, and the Women's Royal Rumble Winner, Nia Jax has to pick which WWE Women's Championship Title Belt she's going to go after at WrestleMania 33.

I'd be interested in watching

30 women? not a chance... 15 sounds better...

1. Charolette
2. Dana Brooke
3. Emma
4. Nia Jas
5. Bayley
6. Alicia Fox
7. Nikki Bella
8. Becky Lynch
9. Natalya
10. Carmella
11. Naomi
12. Eva Marie
13. Tamina 
14. Mickie James
15. Surprise entrant (Sable, Trish, Lita etc.) 


maybe go to 20 and include 5 NXT women.. Asuka, Liv Morgan, Ember Moon, Peyton Royce, Billie Kay 

WWE cant even put a womens match together with more then 4 participants correctly. How will you have all the ladies laying on the mat while they each one on one do their finishers to each other?

Yes. On the actual show. It must happen. 15 Ladies and then Bliss vs. Banks.

The overall womens roster is way too thin to pull off a legit Rumble.

You'd literally have to have ALL the active women from Raw, Smackdown, and NXT, plus add in Mickie James, and that would still only bring you up to 19.

You could always add in Sasha and Alexa and drop one out to keep it at 20, but what's the point of a contender's battle royal when the champions are involved?

And no, we don't need cross brand champion vs. champion matches less than a year into the split.