|
Post by shelleyrules on Jul 17, 2007 17:27:56 GMT -5
LATEST SPOILER NEWS ON WWE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP TONIGHT by Mike Johnson @ 6:00:11 PM on 7/17/2007 The plan right now is that The Great Khali will win the WWE World championship on Smackdown once Edge vacates it due to his pectoral tear. Khali vs. Batista at the Great American Bash will be for the championship. --- This ing sucks.
|
|
|
Post by daboom on Jul 17, 2007 17:28:56 GMT -5
really
|
|
arodmav4124
Main Eventer
Be aWARE of number 94!
Joined on: Feb 23, 2006 11:43:22 GMT -5
Posts: 1,785
|
Post by arodmav4124 on Jul 17, 2007 17:29:33 GMT -5
NNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 21, 2024 9:14:33 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2007 17:35:27 GMT -5
where did you find that garbage at?
|
|
|
Post by shelleyrules on Jul 17, 2007 17:38:47 GMT -5
where did you find that garbage at? Its from PWInsider.com
|
|
|
Post by Blackjack on Jul 17, 2007 17:39:42 GMT -5
ummm bad idea
|
|
|
Post by stevecorinoisgod on Jul 17, 2007 17:41:10 GMT -5
Kane got ed out of the belt...AGAIN.
|
|
Adam3s - V1
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 12, 2006 8:41:51 GMT -5
Posts: 1,794
|
Post by Adam3s - V1 on Jul 17, 2007 17:41:40 GMT -5
If this is true, seriously why the ? Nobody cares about Khali, he is the worst wrestler in the WWE. Batista isn't much better and WWE is really shooting themselves giving Batista and Kahli the title with how roided up both men look, not the best thing to do at this time. Anyway I want to know why Kane should suddenly lose his #1 contendership because of the champion being injuried. Plus Smackdown is a wrestling dominated show so why give a terrible wrestler the belt makes no sense at all. You have guys like Finlay, Matt, Edge, Rey, 'Taker, Crusiers, MVP and others and they feel the need to put it on Khali. He has only had 1 decent match and that was vs Taker which was heavily edited, last man standing and he was taking on Taker. Smackdown is no long be my prefered WWE show if this happens.
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Jul 17, 2007 17:44:51 GMT -5
There will be an uproar, and as much as Kane deserves it, it will be most suited on Khali.
Batista is getting some much needed momentum now that he's in a fued with someone that the fans prefer less than him, and so having Batista chase Great Khali for the Title will do him a favour.
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Jul 17, 2007 17:46:08 GMT -5
I seriously don't get WWE sometimes. It's like the slow kid who nobody wants to hang out with, does something good that makes him cool, than next day he's stuffing his face with Elmer's Glue.
Why, WWE, Why!?
|
|
|
Post by laythvandam on Jul 17, 2007 17:47:48 GMT -5
Damn!
This is just bullcrapman.
|
|
|
Post by Graze on Jul 17, 2007 17:55:34 GMT -5
Great, all the more reason NOT to watch SD
|
|
Jacob
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Joined on: May 15, 2006 14:11:26 GMT -5
Posts: 16,577
|
Post by Jacob on Jul 17, 2007 17:58:01 GMT -5
Vince really wants to keep that title off Batista.
|
|
|
Post by foshizzle on Jul 17, 2007 17:59:33 GMT -5
Ok, I am done with SD. But what the fuk about Kanes title shot. Hell, I would rather have Mark Henry champ then this dumb guy!
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Jul 17, 2007 18:02:20 GMT -5
KAHLI?! AH !
|
|
|
Post by Edge618 on Jul 17, 2007 18:04:19 GMT -5
Dude Khali ing sux. I am so pissed. Kane deserves it more than anyone. Khali will prolly win and then they'll have a triple threat at the Bash. The only good that can come of this is the since the "SD! Curse" maybe Khali will get injured
|
|
|
Post by -Edge- on Jul 17, 2007 18:05:14 GMT -5
UGHHHHHHHHH edge loses title, going to SD soon and not going to get to see my fav wrestler with title
|
|
HoganBai
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 15, 2004 15:06:24 GMT -5
Posts: 4,682
|
Post by HoganBai on Jul 17, 2007 18:08:50 GMT -5
Vince just hates us, doesn't he?
Ugh....
|
|
|
Post by foshizzle on Jul 17, 2007 18:10:52 GMT -5
Vince just hates us, doesn't he? Ugh.... Yeah and Vince says he knows what the fans want!
|
|
|
Post by taker1 on Jul 17, 2007 19:12:27 GMT -5
God this sucks. I'd rather have another Batista reign than this crap.
|
|