Deleted
Joined on: Nov 24, 2024 21:50:18 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2018 1:57:32 GMT -5
OK so then what's the agreement to use the early 1990s WCW world title? Maybe the trademark expired, i just googled how long a trademark lasts, it states 10 years, but, between the 5th and 6th year the registrant must return an affidavit confirming the mark is still in use, not sure but it could have something to do with it
|
|
|
Post by disorder on Sept 7, 2018 14:17:05 GMT -5
It’s been answered in q & a sessions how this works.
Mattel puts in a request for items or stars they would like to use, then wwe can either reach deals with those stars or acquire rights to said item.
|
|
fullmetalitia
Mid-Carder
Joined on: May 9, 2018 16:30:07 GMT -5
Posts: 72
|
Post by fullmetalitia on Sept 7, 2018 15:07:01 GMT -5
As best as I can figure, being involved in the championship belt community and being around people who know their stuff, I'll list off what I know. 1) ECW "Gen 1" (original TV, Tag v1 and v2, World v1 and v2, and Taz TV) belts were all done by Mike Vartanian and are all bootlegs of not-yet-copyrighted Reggie Parks & Dave Millican designs. No info exists as far as I know about legally licensing the designs since the originals were copies of Reggie/Dave art to begin with. 2) ECW's "Gen 2" (TV v2, Buzzsaw Tag v3, World v3, and Taz FTW v2) belts were all done by Joe Marshall (JMar), with some design-work contributed by Paul Heyman and Taz. ECW owned the rights to those designs as part of their deal, and WWE's buyout included the belt designs, so WWE has the ability to allow Mattel to do ECW belts for figures and 2k to do ECW belts in the games, with the exception of the Taz FTW belt, which is owned by Taz, and JMar can only make Taz FTW belts for collectors with Taz's permission. 3) WCW's "Gen 1" (Domed Globe style TV v1, TV v2, TV v3/Cruiserweight v1, Light Heavyweight, United States v1, Tag v1, World Heavyweight 1991, and Vegas Big Gold World Heavyweight) belts were all designed/made by Reggie Parks & Dave Millican (henceforth, "Parks/Millican/Mann Belts", or "PMM" for the rest of this post). WWE only has the rights to use the 1991 belt (the one that's bundled with Ron Simmons) for reasons unknown to me at this time, but that means that 2k can put it in the games and Mattel can put it on figures if WWE wishes. 4) WCW's "Gen 2" (TV v3, Cruiserweight v2, United States v2, Tag v2 and v3, Women's Light-Heavyweight and Heavyweight, Hardcore, and "J-Gold" World Heavyweight) belts were all done by JMar. Here's how the licensing for that goes as far as I know: - Since the TV v3 is a copy of the TV v2, JMar had to pay a fee to PMM to be able to do it. - The CENTER plate for the Cruiserweight v2 is a copy of PMM's "Unified" style, but JMar apparently altered it enough to not have to pay fees. - The "J-Gold" version of the Big Gold was a 3D CNC version of the Big Gold rather than hand-engraved like the original Crumrine Big Gold, so JMar did not have to pay fees to Crumrine Jewelers over the design. - WWE's buyout included the WCW belts, so WWE can use them and allow 2k to put them in the games and allow Mattel to do them for figures if they wish. - GENERIC versions of the Gen 2 belt designs (including the 3D CNC Big Gold) have also been licensed out to Belts By Dan to make for public orders as part of a deal between Dan and Joe so that Dan could help get Joe's outstanding orders to his customers who've been waiting upwards of 12 years for belt orders filled. This does not affect WWE's usage of the belt designs, since WWE only actually owns the WCW-logoed belts and not the designs themselves. 5) WWF's belt designs that were made by PMM (Intercontinental, classic late 1980s and 1990s versions of the Tag Team, Winged Eagle World) are owned by PMM, and WWE licenses those designs for the games and figures (which is why you see the "Parks/Millican/Mann Belts" in the opening of the 2k games). The designs for the 1985 Domed-Globe style Tags (which have been used by multiple companies), and the 1980s and 1990s Women's belts are also owned by PMM, and WWE has so far NOT licensed those designs for games and figures (except the 1990's Women's, which is bundled with Alundra Blayze), presumably since there isn't enough demand to do so, thus they don't feel it's worth the money to do it...question mark? It's also worth noting that the version of the Retro IC's texture-map used in the 2k games for ALL the "Classic Intercontinental" belts is actually a modified version of JMar's version that Cody Rhodes debuted and not the PMM version that came after that. Most of the Retro IC belts bundled with figures like Maryse and Ultimate Warrior are actually the JMar version as well, for some reason. This is all what I can gather to the best of my knowledge, I know that there's some other people with closer knowledge of the situation who can fill in the gaps and make corrections where warranted. I hope any of this was helpful.
|
|
|
Post by muuk76 on Sept 7, 2018 16:13:44 GMT -5
You mean it's on the spreadsheet more like lol.
|
|
jerm
Superstar
no sleep, no fooooooood, no nothing...just maniac-ism
Joined on: Aug 1, 2017 16:10:32 GMT -5
Posts: 733
|
Post by jerm on Sept 10, 2018 16:07:00 GMT -5
It's also worth noting that the version of the Retro IC's texture-map used in the 2k games for ALL the "Classic Intercontinental" belts is actually a modified version of JMar's version that Cody Rhodes debuted and not the PMM version that came after that. Most of the Retro IC belts bundled with figures like Maryse and Ultimate Warrior are actually the JMar version as well, for some reason. For comparison, the modern IC belt in figure form is still the JMar, even though in reality WWE replaced it with a PMM shortly after Cody debuted it: Whereas both light-blue and dark-blue classic IC Elite belts are the correct PMM design:
|
|
|
Post by WCWThunderRosa on Sept 11, 2018 0:16:58 GMT -5
1. WWE has either had the rights to the WCW 91-93 belt for a long time because it’s been in every game since SVR 08 or 09 or THQ/2K/Yukes have had a deal for that belt for awhile 2. When they changed the logos Mattel made the Network IC belt based on the real IC design 3. The WCW TV belt was a ripoff Hogan 86 as was the Guerrero/Jericho ECW TV belt 4. There were two WCW Cruiserweight belts? 5. Despite what all of you have said, WWE does not have the rights to the WCW belts because if they did we’d have seen them by now. They know there’s demand and there’s no reason to not make them unless they can’t. The 2K deal is a separate thing and it’s been stated for over 5 years now
|
|
Blackbird 13
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 6, 2005 3:32:41 GMT -5
Posts: 3,242
|
Post by Blackbird 13 on Sept 11, 2018 0:29:27 GMT -5
1. WWE has either had the rights to the WCW 91-93 belt for a long time because it’s been in every game since SVR 08 or 09 or THQ/2K/Yukes have had a deal for that belt for awhile 2. When they changed the logos Mattel made the Network IC belt based on the real IC design 3. The WCW TV belt was a ripoff Hogan 86 as was the Guerrero/Jericho ECW TV belt 4. There were two WCW Cruiserweight belts? 5. Despite what all of you have said, WWE does not have the rights to the WCW belts because if they did we’d have seen them by now. They know there’s demand and there’s no reason to not make them unless they can’t. The 2K deal is a separate thing and it’s been stated for over 5 years now Regarding 5.. a source close to the situation with PMM and the WWE tells me different. My understanding is that PMM has signed off on the WWE using the designs for replicas, figures, and whatever else, although it was implied that would come with an additional cost. I specifically asked why the belts were in the 2k games and not with the figures, and asked if PMM had a deal with 2k directly. I was told that the deal was though WWE, and extended to figures, toy replicas, and whatever else. The Cruiserweight title being on the package for the HOC figures is interesting, because intellectual property is that whether it's in a belt form or print... but I believe the rights to make a physical copy of wrestling belts can move separately from that? A shame that JMar, PMM, Bill, and a WWE rep can't just tell us outright what the hold up is. Speculation based on what we can piece together sucks.
|
|
|
Post by disorder on Sept 11, 2018 8:04:17 GMT -5
1. WWE has either had the rights to the WCW 91-93 belt for a long time because it’s been in every game since SVR 08 or 09 or THQ/2K/Yukes have had a deal for that belt for awhile 2. When they changed the logos Mattel made the Network IC belt based on the real IC design 3. The WCW TV belt was a ripoff Hogan 86 as was the Guerrero/Jericho ECW TV belt 4. There were two WCW Cruiserweight belts? 5. Despite what all of you have said, WWE does not have the rights to the WCW belts because if they did we’d have seen them by now. They know there’s demand and there’s no reason to not make them unless they can’t. The 2K deal is a separate thing and it’s been stated for over 5 years now Regarding 5.. a source close to the situation with PMM and the WWE tells me different. My understanding is that PMM has signed off on the WWE using the designs for replicas, figures, and whatever else, although it was implied that would come with an additional cost. I specifically asked why the belts were in the 2k games and not with the figures, and asked if PMM had a deal with 2k directly. I was told that the deal was though WWE, and extended to figures, toy replicas, and whatever else. The Cruiserweight title being on the package for the HOC figures is interesting, because intellectual property is that whether it's in a belt form or print... but I believe the rights to make a physical copy of wrestling belts can move separately from that? A shame that JMar, PMM, Bill, and a WWE rep can't just tell us outright what the hold up is. Speculation based on what we can piece together sucks. Jesus bud. It’s pictures because wwe own the rights to the image. Same reason they can show photos of flair with the new title and videos of all the past belts. Same reason why they could show videos of Owen and what not. Some belt designs are obviously a package deal when making the games, but bill has told us plenty of times not to gauge what the game has, to what we have the rights to makes...that includes belt designs and stars.
|
|
Army of Doinks
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Dec 27, 2017 14:17:58 GMT -5
Posts: 216
|
Post by Army of Doinks on Sept 11, 2018 8:15:49 GMT -5
wwe doesn’t own the rights to the winged eagle, classic ic, old wcw belts, classic tags. That’s why wwe went and changed belt makers in the beginning of the attitude era, cause Reggie parks didn’t want wwe to own the rights to those designs, which is why Millican and parks could still make those old school designs for collectors, just can’t use the wwf logo. All the new designs after the attitude era on, wwe owns the designs and rights to. I misspoke. According to someone close to the situation, they have the rights to use all those titles. Not saying that Parks, Millican, and Mann don't still hold the right to the designs, just that the WWE is allowed to use them under the current arrangement. You'll notice that the WCW World, US, old Tag, new Tag, Cruiserweight, and Hardcore titles are all in WWE 2K18... and that the WCW Cruiserweight Title was pictured with HOC Eddie Guerrero, despite him being packed incorrectly with the WWE Cruiserweight Title. Why they choose not to allow Mattel to use the WCW belts to be pack in items is a mystery. I think a lot of it has to do with WWE wanting to push their stuff because they are the one company that won the Monday night wars. Just a thought
|
|
jerm
Superstar
no sleep, no fooooooood, no nothing...just maniac-ism
Joined on: Aug 1, 2017 16:10:32 GMT -5
Posts: 733
|
Post by jerm on Sept 11, 2018 8:26:29 GMT -5
1. WWE has either had the rights to the WCW 91-93 belt for a long time because it’s been in every game since SVR 08 or 09 or THQ/2K/Yukes have had a deal for that belt for awhile 2. When they changed the logos Mattel made the Network IC belt based on the real IC design 3. The WCW TV belt was a ripoff Hogan 86 as was the Guerrero/Jericho ECW TV belt 4. There were two WCW Cruiserweight belts? 5. Despite what all of you have said, WWE does not have the rights to the WCW belts because if they did we’d have seen them by now. They know there’s demand and there’s no reason to not make them unless they can’t. The 2K deal is a separate thing and it’s been stated for over 5 years now 2. While the nugget texture is gone, the plates are still very much the JMar design (font, banners, globe) which is not screen-accurate to the current PMM in use. 3. The Hogan 86 and ECW TV, yes. But the WCW TV only shares a similar shape and elongated globe, neither of which are identical. 4. www.reddit.com/r/SquaredCircle/comments/7gml1o/the_last_wcw_television_title_was_originally_the/
|
|
erikg
Superstar
Joined on: May 31, 2016 9:41:59 GMT -5
Posts: 809
|
Post by erikg on Sept 11, 2018 8:56:45 GMT -5
I misspoke. According to someone close to the situation, they have the rights to use all those titles. Not saying that Parks, Millican, and Mann don't still hold the right to the designs, just that the WWE is allowed to use them under the current arrangement. You'll notice that the WCW World, US, old Tag, new Tag, Cruiserweight, and Hardcore titles are all in WWE 2K18... and that the WCW Cruiserweight Title was pictured with HOC Eddie Guerrero, despite him being packed incorrectly with the WWE Cruiserweight Title. Why they choose not to allow Mattel to use the WCW belts to be pack in items is a mystery. I think a lot of it has to do with WWE wanting to push their stuff because they are the one company that won the Monday night wars. Just a thought Yeah but they could throw us a bone every once in a while. Especially with Hall of Champions this is the perfect time to do it.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 24, 2024 21:50:18 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2018 9:41:04 GMT -5
I misspoke. According to someone close to the situation, they have the rights to use all those titles. Not saying that Parks, Millican, and Mann don't still hold the right to the designs, just that the WWE is allowed to use them under the current arrangement. You'll notice that the WCW World, US, old Tag, new Tag, Cruiserweight, and Hardcore titles are all in WWE 2K18... and that the WCW Cruiserweight Title was pictured with HOC Eddie Guerrero, despite him being packed incorrectly with the WWE Cruiserweight Title. Why they choose not to allow Mattel to use the WCW belts to be pack in items is a mystery. I think a lot of it has to do with WWE wanting to push their stuff because they are the one company that won the Monday night wars. Just a thought Haha thats a concept not many on here will understand
|
|
|
Post by WCWThunderRosa on Sept 11, 2018 10:13:13 GMT -5
1. WWE has either had the rights to the WCW 91-93 belt for a long time because it’s been in every game since SVR 08 or 09 or THQ/2K/Yukes have had a deal for that belt for awhile 2. When they changed the logos Mattel made the Network IC belt based on the real IC design 3. The WCW TV belt was a ripoff Hogan 86 as was the Guerrero/Jericho ECW TV belt 4. There were two WCW Cruiserweight belts? 5. Despite what all of you have said, WWE does not have the rights to the WCW belts because if they did we’d have seen them by now. They know there’s demand and there’s no reason to not make them unless they can’t. The 2K deal is a separate thing and it’s been stated for over 5 years now 2. While the nugget texture is gone, the plates are still very much the JMar design (font, banners, globe) which is not screen-accurate to the current PMM in use. 3. The Hogan 86 and ECW TV, yes. But the WCW TV only shares a similar shape and elongated globe, neither of which are identical. 4. www.reddit.com/r/SquaredCircle/comments/7gml1o/the_last_wcw_television_title_was_originally_the/Huh, interesting. Did it ever make it to TV as the Cruiserweight belt or was the traditional version always used?
|
|
jerm
Superstar
no sleep, no fooooooood, no nothing...just maniac-ism
Joined on: Aug 1, 2017 16:10:32 GMT -5
Posts: 733
|
Post by jerm on Sept 11, 2018 10:25:13 GMT -5
Huh, interesting. Did it ever make it to TV as the Cruiserweight belt or was the traditional version always used? As the cruiserweight title, no. The LHW title was inactive as of '92 and the CW didn't debut until '96. They must've had preliminary plans for a cruiserweight title given this belt's creation in '95, but for whatever reason decided on using it as the TV strap instead, even before covering the CRUISERWEIGHT banner.
|
|
eliteplayer12
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Jun 21, 2018 11:39:19 GMT -5
Posts: 121
|
Post by eliteplayer12 on Sept 11, 2018 12:21:45 GMT -5
I don’t believe that their not wanting to get the belts out there. Due to the fact we have old Nitro and NWO ring skirts.
|
|
|
Post by WCWThunderRosa on Sept 11, 2018 14:40:57 GMT -5
I don’t believe that their not wanting to get the belts out there. Due to the fact we have old Nitro and NWO ring skirts. Those weren’t made by Mattel
|
|
jerm
Superstar
no sleep, no fooooooood, no nothing...just maniac-ism
Joined on: Aug 1, 2017 16:10:32 GMT -5
Posts: 733
|
Post by jerm on Sept 11, 2018 14:53:14 GMT -5
I don’t believe that their not wanting to get the belts out there. Due to the fact we have old Nitro and NWO ring skirts. Those weren’t made by Mattel Nor would screenprinting logos onto existing fabric templates cost nearly as much as molds for both belts and plates.
|
|
|
Post by Artie Kendall on Sept 11, 2018 16:20:09 GMT -5
Perhaps that wrestling figure podcast could do some investigating about it.
|
|
Blackbird 13
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 6, 2005 3:32:41 GMT -5
Posts: 3,242
|
Post by Blackbird 13 on Sept 11, 2018 16:26:55 GMT -5
So I asked my source again, and was told that Mattel does indeed have a license from PMM that includes the WCW belts.. but that obviously would not include the JMar belts... and from what was previously said, most of the WCW belts from the Monday Night War are JMar.
That said, it would be cool to get a WCW TV Title... and maybe the first version of the Tag Titles.
|
|
guster
Main Eventer
WF 15 Year Member
Joined on: Dec 23, 2001 10:56:51 GMT -5
Posts: 3,194
|
Post by guster on Sept 11, 2018 17:06:01 GMT -5
|
|