|
|
Post by sonstuds on Jun 27, 2007 11:09:03 GMT -5
not really, they were sitting players in week 16 against miami Which was their choice. |
|
|
|
Post by cmm on Jun 27, 2007 11:12:24 GMT -5
not really, they were sitting players in week 16 against miami Which was their choice. which was not elway's fault or the players like I said and another thing kliquid the vikings weren't favored in every game because in all the years ive been watching football they have NEVER been favored in Lambeau and the broncos were that year |
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Jun 27, 2007 14:13:44 GMT -5
which was not elway's fault or the players like I said The Vikings also sat players near the end of the season... and another thing kliquid the vikings weren't favored in every game because in all the years ive been watching football they have NEVER been favored in Lambeau and the broncos were that year ... The Broncos didn't even play the Packers in 1998. If you don't believe the Vikings thought they were Superbowl contenders that year, you're completely dillusional. |
|
|
|
Post by cmm on Jun 27, 2007 14:26:01 GMT -5
which was not elway's fault or the players like I said The Vikings also sat players near the end of the season... and another thing kliquid the vikings weren't favored in every game because in all the years ive been watching football they have NEVER been favored in Lambeau and the broncos were that year ... The Broncos didn't even play the Packers in 1998. If you don't believe the Vikings thought they were Superbowl contenders that year, you're completely dillusional. I think you might be lost or something.. First of all I said this was the only year that the Vikings were a Superbowl contending team. Second of all I said that Minnesota was NOT favored in all of their games because they were a 7 point underdog to Green Bay in Lambeau. Then I followed that by saying Denver WAS favored in every game that year. |
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Jun 27, 2007 14:45:09 GMT -5
The Vikings also sat players near the end of the season... ... The Broncos didn't even play the Packers in 1998. If you don't believe the Vikings thought they were Superbowl contenders that year, you're completely dillusional. I think you might be lost or something.. First of all I said this was the only year that the Vikings were a Superbowl contending team. Second of all I said that Minnesota was NOT favored in all of their games because they were a 7 point underdog to Green Bay in Lambeau. Then I followed that by saying Denver WAS favored in every game that year. Maybe if you used some punctuation, I'd be able to understand what you were saying. |
|
|
|
Post by cmm on Jun 27, 2007 15:26:46 GMT -5
I think you might be lost or something.. First of all I said this was the only year that the Vikings were a Superbowl contending team. Second of all I said that Minnesota was NOT favored in all of their games because they were a 7 point underdog to Green Bay in Lambeau. Then I followed that by saying Denver WAS favored in every game that year. Maybe if you used some punctuation, I'd be able to understand what you were saying. it really wasnt that hard to comprehend even when i do express a thought in a complete sentence, you still haven't figured it out. like you saying I didn't think they were SB contenders in 98 its ok to be wrong once in a while |
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Jun 27, 2007 16:26:22 GMT -5
Yes, you DID say they weren't Superbowl contenders. Bah', I'm tired of arguing about something so trivial. That Vikings team was one of the best of all-time. Randy Moss thought he was on a team that was going to the Superbowl and he was playing hard -- hopefully that's a sign that he'll return to his glory days. |
|
