|
Post by hbkbigdaddycool on Mar 6, 2019 12:16:46 GMT -5
I know this is the classic thread, but I am hoping PJ understands why I am gonna be talking about some current stars too.
So I seen on the WWE thread that Tommaso Ciampa needs neck surgery and will be out up to 14 months. He had like multiple knee and shoulder surgeries two years ago too. And he is the top heel of NXT.
Now look back to the 80s.
Ric Flair was the top heel in the NWA, and he never once had to leave for surgery that I know of. All the top heels in the WWF, wrestling Hogan in the 80s never had to leave for surgery. Though Paul Orndorff probably should have since he did have a neck situation.
But what I am getting at, is that these wrestlers now a day seem to get these neck injuries a lot more frequent. Just look back in the past 20 years. Benoit, Edge, Rhyno, Angle, and I know there are others, but my mind is drawing a blank at the moment. But they all had neck injuries. Let alone guys who have blown out their knees over the past 20 years from the style of wrestling that is so fast paced.
What I am getting at here, is that sure, the guys now can do a lot of crazy stuff in the ring, but look at the cost it's leaving them?? Injuries after injuries, surgeries after surgeries.
When you look back at the 80s and 90s, sure, injuries did happen, but it was rarely in the ring! HBK blew out his knee before SummerSlam 90 in a motorcycle accident. Not by doing a crazy spot in the ring. And back then, stuff the Rockers did was considered crazy! Now? It's pretty tame.
So do you think wrestlers will eventually go back to the 80s style of wrestling, slow, story telling, or is it too far gone now? Will injuries like Ciampa's be a common trend moving forward for the new stars of the future??
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Mar 6, 2019 12:30:12 GMT -5
You should have just put it on the main WWE board. And to answer the question no I really don’t think they’ll go back because nowadays they all just want to go from one high spot to to their next high spot all Thule while without telling any story in the ring.
|
|
|
Post by hbkbigdaddycool on Mar 6, 2019 12:47:43 GMT -5
You should have just put it on the main WWE board. And to answer the question no I really don’t think they’ll go back because nowadays they all just want to go from one high spot to to their next high spot all Thule while without telling any story in the ring.
The problem with putting this in the WWE section, is that all the fans are all convinced that guys like Gargano, Ciampa, Black, Balor, and such are the greatest stars ever and refuse to even watch stuff from the 90s, let alone the 80s.
That thread of "are you a believe yet" on the WWE board proves that.
If by that do I believe these wrestlers will have shortened careers and be retired by age 40 due to severe injuries, then yes!
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Mar 6, 2019 12:58:50 GMT -5
True but this could have gone into the Ciampa injury post and you could have asked about the injuries of todays superstars vs the ones in the past is worth all the high flying or should they go back to less high flying and more ring psychology driven matches.
|
|
|
Post by Gorilla on Mar 6, 2019 13:13:20 GMT -5
I like it here as well. It would get hammered by current generation fans as an attack on the present day style.
We did have our share of injuries though. Jesse Ventura's career was ended through injuries. Bret Hart had that nasty injury with Bravo. Shawn messed up his knee again later in his career. Savage had a messed up elbow for mania 5.
I'm sure there are a lot of instances of bad injuries, in the 80s you had to work through them or not get paid.
|
|
nibs92
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 29, 2008 5:47:21 GMT -5
Posts: 2,357
|
Post by nibs92 on Mar 6, 2019 13:40:13 GMT -5
For me, I wonder if the multiple lawsuits for concussions etc have made the WWF Take injuries more seriously. That coupled with guaranteed money contract could have an impact.
I’ve read before about stories of wrestlers performing while injured for fear of losing money or a certain spot on the card. For example if Flair took a year off for neck surgery, he would lose out on money but the NWA board might not have trusted him to be the top guy and impact on his future earnings and employability.
|
|
|
Post by Grumpyoldman on Mar 6, 2019 14:00:49 GMT -5
I remembered when Krusher Kruschev (Barry Darsow) severely injured his leg during a match against Sam Houston. He had to drop the Mid-Atlantic Heavyweight title to Houston & took 6 months off to heal.
In Jim Cornette's book, he said (and showed proof) that JCP took $25 out of every wrestler's paycheck, to give to Kruschev, just so he could have a bit of an income. There wasn't any worker's compensation or disability checks. If you didn't work, you didn't get paid. This was JCP's way of making sure that injured wrestlers had a bit of an income if they needed time off.
Kind of nice for them to do something like that.
(1:36:30-1:49:23)
|
|
robbutler01
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 10, 2013 15:10:27 GMT -5
Posts: 1,282
|
Post by robbutler01 on Mar 6, 2019 14:19:03 GMT -5
I think this post fits better in this section too. I agree that surgery seems to happen more often now but that's probably also because modern medicine has come on alot from back then too and they fix things that they couldn't then. Unfortunately I don't see it going away from high spots back to old style story telling as we all knew it especially as these days it's more a game of "can you top this" so the injuries will keep coming and gettimg more regular. While they don't offer health insurance they will look after the performers ( more now to be "safe" and protect the company. Just look at the blood situation now, blood = ref with gloves and the match tends to stop so they can glue people together whereas in 80s,90s or even the RA era (eddy guerreros match in particular) nothing stopped it unless it was a story line.
|
|
|
Post by theoutlaw1999 on Mar 6, 2019 16:04:51 GMT -5
Wrestling fans of today and especially kids wouldn't have the attention span for slow 80's style matches. Look at Ziggler and Rollin's Iron man match. Now I know it wasn't slow wrestling but it was 1 hour long and the crowd got bored and hijacked it to entertain themselves.
Now as far as injuries go the only guy from the past 20 years who has been really lucky is Kane. I believe he only had 1 injury in 2002. Ambrose had a good run too up until last year because he was wrestling constantly from 2012.
|
|
|
Post by Next Manufactured’s Sweater on Mar 6, 2019 16:10:26 GMT -5
They just worked through serious injuries with a mountain of pain pills and recreational drugs in the 80s.
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Mar 6, 2019 16:11:52 GMT -5
in some ways it has returned. will it come full circle? debatable. wrestling in the 70s and before had some true athletics. the spots were very safe. superstar billy graham was the template for change and what wrestlers would turn into in the 80s - an increasement in spots, bodybuilding physiques, and less traditional characters. a lot of the athletics were traded in for showmanship. and what did we get? a lot of those 80s guys are dead now, with wrestlers from previous ages outliving then. Bruno hated how things were in the 80s with the steroids. then we enter the 90s, where we see an increased level of work rate and athletics due to the likes of Bret Hart, Michaels, etc. Bret Hart attributes this change to the tag team matches in the 80s, which may or may not be true but seems possible. then we have ECW let the cat outta the bag. as Jim Cornette said, the wrestlers went from not hurting each other and the crowd believing they are to really hurting each other and the crowd believing they’re not. I love ECW but it is an incredibly fair criticism. Heyman exploited the business and therefore changed the work rate to a fast pace, dangerous, reckless one and it really ed a lot of guys up right up to the ruthless aggression age where too many guys were getting worn out and they had to reduce the chaos. now instead of shots to the head and endless hard suplexes to cement etc, we have extreme athletics from guys not on a quarter of the steroids they were 20 years ago. and no body can take the spots these guys are doing, top athletes or not. local indies like SMASH already have a reduced work rate where there is more of that 1980s showmanship/play the crowd/stomp around the ring behaviour. they have spots and gimmick matches but they’re more few and far between. house shows for WWE are far less costly in bumps and feature showmanship moreso. so we aren’t too far off a full out return. i think if they could start telling better stories, the focus on athletic spots to sell the matches would lessen. but that’s me speculating / end rant
|
|
|
Post by keegandimitrijevic01 on Mar 6, 2019 16:24:16 GMT -5
Too many guys dive and take unnecessary bumps these days. You don't need to do thirty dives in a match to tell a story. 80's wrestling was more methodical and mat-based. Today, you have guys on the turnbuckle or the ropes every 1-2 segments. I do personally think the newer guys should tone their high spots down (not get rid of them, but don't do them as frequently). For example: Gargano & Ciampa pulling the mat off the concrete- it's cool here and there, but they beat it to death because they did it so close in between. Plus, bumping on concrete in 2019 isn't needed.
|
|
|
Post by warriorlynx on Mar 8, 2019 15:06:30 GMT -5
A lot of guys got hurt in the 80s but continued wrestling that was how it was. No salaries or downside guarantees, the only guarantees were minimum payout for house show + tv. So they had to work to pay the bills and what not. Randy Savage worked with a staph infection at WMV when they almost had to cancel the main event. Basically you could break your thumb and still work, just look at Orndorff the guy was in NO way in any condition to feud with Hulk in late 86 but they were selling out shows regardless and he worked till he couldn't anymore and his neck was out of it before WM3. Today a lot more care from the WWE is also noticed than it was back then.
|
|
|
Post by blissfan4life on Mar 8, 2019 15:16:05 GMT -5
I'll take risky flashy spots over sleep inducing Headlocks and submission bullcrap
|
|
|
Post by warriorlynx on Mar 8, 2019 15:20:00 GMT -5
I'll take risky flashy spots over sleep inducing Headlocks and submission bullcrap It was different in the 80s, the story was told in the ring and out, it was pop culture. People would literally pop even if it's a punch that knocks out the guy you hated out of the ring. The performers were trained to make you believe it was legit, today they don't even know how to make themselves believe. Kayfabe is dead, gosh I rather not talk about today's wrestling in this forum.
|
|
TheEvilDoink1987
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 22, 2010 21:37:52 GMT -5
Posts: 2,819
|
Post by TheEvilDoink1987 on Mar 9, 2019 20:17:08 GMT -5
I'll take risky flashy spots over sleep inducing Headlocks and submission bullcrap I'd prefer a good blend of both. Some of the really crazy spots these days just look so rehearsed and make the whole product come across as even more "fake" if that makes any sense. On the flip side, I agree that your standard early 80s WWF match is tough to sit through.
|
|