|
|
Post by keegandimitrijevic01 on Jun 11, 2019 22:19:03 GMT -5
What do you think would’ve been in store for Goldberg has he stayed with WWE past 2004? I think he would’ve went to Smackdown, turned heel, and would’ve been the man to take the WWE Title off of Eddie Guerrero, then he would’ve dropped the WWE Title to The Undertaker at WrestleMania 21- but that’s what I think. Past WrestleMania XX, what do you think would’ve happened to Goldberg had he stayed with WWE? Let’s say he stayed throughout the entire time until now
|
|
|
|
Post by JokerFC on Jun 12, 2019 5:11:55 GMT -5
I don't feel He would have turned heel had he stayed. The match @ WMXX would have been a damn site better because McMahon wouldn't have deliberately sabotaged it.
I reckon a feud with the Kane character would have been likely and possibly a move to SD! in the draft.
Eddie would still have had a meltdown
JBL would still have been the guy offered the strap as the heel.
I see Goldberg entering a title programme with him for sure.
|
|
|
|
Post by hbkbigdaddycool on Jun 12, 2019 6:48:41 GMT -5
It's weird in wrestling some times, because it's hard to figure out what Goldberg or even Lesnar would have done if they both had stayed. It just felt like Wrestlemania XX was perfect for both of them to leave at that time. Especially in the route the WWE was going with Guerrero and Benoit as the champions on both shows.
I would think that Goldberg vs. Batista would have for sure been a thing that Vince would have wanted to see happen on Raw after Mania.
After that, I could see Goldberg being the big draft that goes over to Smackdown. A Goldberg vs. Undertaker match at SummerSlam 2004 would have made sense for a main event type style match. But even if Goldberg did stay, I could only see him staying maybe another year and that is it. The thing with Goldberg is that with his character and such, longevity doesn't work.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kill Em' All on Jun 13, 2019 1:26:57 GMT -5
Never been a fan, but I think a run with Taker would be good maybe HBK and Cena. But, honestly a run with Cena would be good with like a 2008 era Cena. So, scratch that. Other then that, be gone by April 2005.
|
|
|
|
Post by HandsomeHollywood on Jun 16, 2019 8:57:07 GMT -5
Not sure there would be much for him really. I could see him feuding continuously with the likes of Kane, Triple H, Orton, Batista. It would have been interesting to see if he'd have crossed paths with Cena.
Part-time deals weren't much of a thing then, hence why Lesnar left. I think the closest to a part-timer there was then was probably Michaels. Pretty sure he worked a lot fewer live events then than anyone else, but was always at TV. That may have changed if Goldberg stuck around, a guy who would have benefitted greatly from a part-time schedule.
In the end, I think he'd have just done more of the same. The longer he'd have stayed, the more it would have hurt him. Can easily see Goldberg moving down the card to feud with Umaga and others.
|
|
|
|
Post by keegandimitrijevic01 on Jun 16, 2019 10:39:43 GMT -5
Not sure there would be much for him really. I could see him feuding continuously with the likes of Kane, Triple H, Orton, Batista. It would have been interesting to see if he'd have crossed paths with Cena. Part-time deals weren't much of a thing then, hence why Lesnar left. I think the closest to a part-timer there was then was probably Michaels. Pretty sure he worked a lot fewer live events then than anyone else, but was always at TV. That may have changed if Goldberg stuck around, a guy who would have benefitted greatly from a part-time schedule. In the end, I think he'd have just done more of the same. The longer he'd have stayed, the more it would have hurt him. Can easily see Goldberg moving down the card to feud with Umaga and others. I could’ve only seen him staying until WrestleMania 21 at most. I’m gonna do a booking on him soon |
|
