Mid card title

Dark title

I would love to see a Television Championship in AEW. Have Arn or Tully unveil it at it’s debut ceremony.

I am 100% sure we don't have to worry about them overdoing it.  I think the absolute ceiling in the company is 5 titles. 3 men's and 2 women's (tag titles when the division eventually gets big enough, literally years down the road). Tony is adamant that he wants the titles to really mean something, and they've been plugging that since day 1.

I absolutely love NJPW, but they are terrible for having too many titles as well.

By end of summer I'd love to see a Revolution Middleweight title.

Something for MJF and Darby to fight over before heading to the main title

I'm all for another belt, but I think they're wise to hold off for now.

It's still a very small roster, and a lot of their roster is tied up in tag teams. I'm assuming that this recent tv deal will give them the guaranteed revenue to start to expand the roster over the next 6-9 months, plus whatever this second show will be.

That's where you add a midcard belt. I love the idea of a TV title, especially with their PPV schedule. But right now they've done a good job of building midcard singles feuds and elevating talent (Darby, Scorpio, MJF) without needing a midcard title to do it.

After Revolution I don't believe in a Mid-Card title for AEW anymore. Everyone in singles should be going after the World title

After the Bucks vs. Kenny/Page it's a shoe in for major Tag Team competition in the future meaning the Tag belts FINALLY HAVE some fricken meaning and value to them

IF they decide on another championship, I would say release one after their first visit to the UK and introduce an "AEW International Heavyweight Championship", like the old WCW International belt.

It'd certainly be handled better

To everyone talking about a six-man championship - the Bucks came out against that in a big way in September last year so I don't think we'll be seeing that.

As others have said, I'd like them to make the ring a mid-card accolade.

I'd like to see them do more tournaments and awards rather than having a belt to hot-potatoe around. Or have wrestlers competing over achievements like most consecutive wins, most consecutive matches without being pinned for a two-count etc.

I know it might seem too old school, but sticking with trophies, medals, and championship rings would be a great way to establish a difference from everyone else who uses title belts. Think of the medals like military medals where each one represents a different accomplishment. For example: Ten match winning streak, pinned the reigning champion, won on Pay-Per-View, wrestled in an iron man match, won a battle royal etc. That way you have other prizes to elevate feuds in conjunction with personal issues.

Another upside of not having a traditional championship is that it masks the lack of depth of the different divisions. I speak from experience when I say being a wrestler is hard, but virtually all the women AEW has brought in are not even remotely ready for national television or pay per view bookings. That makes them unready to challenge for a title and a title is only as good as the champion and that champion is defined in part by the merit of the challengers. Focusing on the accomplishments of medals or trophies helps elevate the talent while keeping them from needing to be in the title picture. It just helps give the whole roster other things to do beside strive for a title that once you win it, there's nothing else to do once you've lost it.