walkingturtles
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 22, 2018 19:54:00 GMT -5
Posts: 1,703
|
Post by walkingturtles on Jun 26, 2020 17:47:42 GMT -5
I have no problem someone making accusations to the police or appropriate authorities. I have some problem with making them over Facebook and Twitter and the like. They are essentially slander if you make something of that magnitude and have no intention to pursue it. Again though, until there is actual evidence or legal proceedings and convictions, the media and companies should refrain from proceedings as well. If someone says I sexually assaulted them over twitter, no one should give that a passing notice other than, hey if you think that happened report it to the authorities. If they don’t then it’s not a situation I should want to touch or support. Clearly there is some ulterior issues if you are fine putting that person on blast but not going to the authorities. If you go to the police, then it’s a serious matter that should be investigated. Although until you are actually charged or convicted, jobs should be liable if they fire you and it was a false accusation. There’s been too much propaganda from the media on so many subjects and we have seen so many people lying in this day that we need to stop destroying people beforehand. in the case of Joey Ryan say, it’s all but definite that he’s guilty of the majority if not all of his accusations, he’s already acknowledged them to some degree although didn’t own total blame. he would be a very difficult one to go after in court due to lack of evidence - you feel that those that were victimized shouldn’t have come forward on social media and had him essentially exiled? I understand your perspective, but I feel like you’re rather unaware or ignoring how a lot wealthy men are treated by authorities. the victims of jeffrey Epstein were repeatedly ignored by police. by your standards the victim’s claims would have then been invalid. I said if you have no intention of going to the authorities and leaving it in the realm of social media, I have an issue with it. Yes I’m aware how the rich can manipulate and have the support of authority. But if you have gone to the police with your story and we’re ignored, I fully support your right to blast it everywhere. Why? Because you believe it enough to have it investigated and challenged by authorities. Basically if you have been sexually assaulted go to the police first, then feel free to do whatever is necessary to get your message out.
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Jun 26, 2020 17:50:25 GMT -5
in the case of Joey Ryan say, it’s all but definite that he’s guilty of the majority if not all of his accusations, he’s already acknowledged them to some degree although didn’t own total blame. he would be a very difficult one to go after in court due to lack of evidence - you feel that those that were victimized shouldn’t have come forward on social media and had him essentially exiled? I understand your perspective, but I feel like you’re rather unaware or ignoring how a lot wealthy men are treated by authorities. the victims of jeffrey Epstein were repeatedly ignored by police. by your standards the victim’s claims would have then been invalid. I said if you have no intention of going to the authorities and leaving it in the realm of social media, I have an issue with it. Yes I’m aware how the rich can manipulate and have the support of authority. But if you have gone to the police with your story and we’re ignored, I fully support your right to blast it everywhere. Why? Because you believe it enough to have it investigated and challenged by authorities. Basically if you have been sexually assaulted go to the police first, then feel free to do whatever is necessary to get your message out. and that’s fair enough. I don’t think we really had a disagreement to begin with, but I didn’t specify context in my original post so my bad.
|
|
|
Post by Bandalero on Jun 26, 2020 18:06:49 GMT -5
Yeah that's not at all what happened in that thread. We've all already pretty much posted in this thread. I feel like that's using mark in a really derogatory way, which is kind of hilarious. I know I'm part of who you're talking about, which makes it even funnier, since I watch a ton of wrestling beyond just AEW. New Japan does draw, but it draws in Japan. Culture in Japan is very different than culture in America. Are there NJPW fans in America? Of course there are, just like there are WWE fans in Japan. Overall though, I don't think a product like New Japan would actually draw in America. I really love New Japan, but I don't think it would be successful as a large scale promotion in America. Bingo! New Japan is successful in Japan because it's a cultural fit, that promotion wouldn't be successful as it is anywhere else in the world. A lot of guys really love to shove the "AEW mark" excuse at us every chance they get, but what I'm seeing in this thread (apart from the side argument over sexual assault allegations) is a whole bunch of fans of the product being constructively critical.
|
|
voicesinmyhead
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 4, 2009 19:21:00 GMT -5
Posts: 1,594
|
Post by voicesinmyhead on Jun 26, 2020 18:33:19 GMT -5
Yeah that's not at all what happened in that thread. We've all already pretty much posted in this thread. I feel like that's using mark in a really derogatory way, which is kind of hilarious. I know I'm part of who you're talking about, which makes it even funnier, since I watch a ton of wrestling beyond just AEW. New Japan does draw, but it draws in Japan. Culture in Japan is very different than culture in America. Are there NJPW fans in America? Of course there are, just like there are WWE fans in Japan. Overall though, I don't think a product like New Japan would actually draw in America. I really love New Japan, but I don't think it would be successful as a large scale promotion in America. If you watch and follow all kinds of wrestling then you would know that New Japan DOES draw in the US. They sold out MSG in one day and have held a ton of shows in California. They draw here, not just in Japan. And to say that it isn't enough to just draw in Japan is silly. There is no evidence to show that AEW would draw anywhere outside the US right now so the US is technically the only spot that they draw as well. AND, it is a fact that New Japan draws more in Japan than AEW draws in the US. Also, I don't know why you think I was referring to you in my previous post. I don't even know who you are. I was just saying that there are many people that will defend AEW without acknowledging its flaws. Every company will have flaws. Simple as that.
|
|
voicesinmyhead
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 4, 2009 19:21:00 GMT -5
Posts: 1,594
|
Post by voicesinmyhead on Jun 26, 2020 18:34:48 GMT -5
Yeah that's not at all what happened in that thread. We've all already pretty much posted in this thread. I feel like that's using mark in a really derogatory way, which is kind of hilarious. I know I'm part of who you're talking about, which makes it even funnier, since I watch a ton of wrestling beyond just AEW. New Japan does draw, but it draws in Japan. Culture in Japan is very different than culture in America. Are there NJPW fans in America? Of course there are, just like there are WWE fans in Japan. Overall though, I don't think a product like New Japan would actually draw in America. I really love New Japan, but I don't think it would be successful as a large scale promotion in America. Bingo! New Japan is successful in Japan because it's a cultural fit, that promotion wouldn't be successful as it is anywhere else in the world. A lot of guys really love to shove the "AEW mark" excuse at us every chance they get, but what I'm seeing in this thread (apart from the side argument over sexual assault allegations) is a whole bunch of fans of the product being constructively critical. FALSE> New Japan draws here in the US and sells out constantly in Australia and the UK. Get your facts straight.
|
|
|
Post by Mr. #1derful 🇵🇸 on Jun 26, 2020 18:36:02 GMT -5
New Japan is successful in Japan because it's a cultural fit, that promotion wouldn't be successful as it is anywhere else in the world. Colorful, engaging characters, hard-hitting action, consistent booking, cool merch, some eye candy for the ladies. IDK, it sounds like a strong base formula. I'd rather watch Matt Hardy do his thing than whatever boring stuff Brodi Lee's been doing. The Dark Order gimmick is death no matter how many people they've tried to cram in there. It's a lost cause.
|
|
walkingturtles
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 22, 2018 19:54:00 GMT -5
Posts: 1,703
|
Post by walkingturtles on Jun 26, 2020 18:39:42 GMT -5
I said if you have no intention of going to the authorities and leaving it in the realm of social media, I have an issue with it. Yes I’m aware how the rich can manipulate and have the support of authority. But if you have gone to the police with your story and we’re ignored, I fully support your right to blast it everywhere. Why? Because you believe it enough to have it investigated and challenged by authorities. Basically if you have been sexually assaulted go to the police first, then feel free to do whatever is necessary to get your message out. and that’s fair enough. I don’t think we really had a disagreement to begin with, but I didn’t specify context in my original post so my bad. Oh no brother you are all good. Your post was solid and allowed me to clarify further My point and refine it. I’ve just seen a lot of high profile cases where we rush to judgement, and we have gotten to a point where we won’t walk anything back because the virtue signaling gives a false sense of moral superiority so then we reach even further and into the more absurd.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 23, 2024 4:59:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2020 19:08:56 GMT -5
Yeah that's not at all what happened in that thread. We've all already pretty much posted in this thread. I feel like that's using mark in a really derogatory way, which is kind of hilarious. I know I'm part of who you're talking about, which makes it even funnier, since I watch a ton of wrestling beyond just AEW. New Japan does draw, but it draws in Japan. Culture in Japan is very different than culture in America. Are there NJPW fans in America? Of course there are, just like there are WWE fans in Japan. Overall though, I don't think a product like New Japan would actually draw in America. I really love New Japan, but I don't think it would be successful as a large scale promotion in America. If you watch and follow all kinds of wrestling then you would know that New Japan DOES draw in the US. They sold out MSG in one day and have held a ton of shows in California. They draw here, not just in Japan. And to say that it isn't enough to just draw in Japan is silly. There is no evidence to show that AEW would draw anywhere outside the US right now so the US is technically the only spot that they draw as well. AND, it is a fact that New Japan draws more in Japan than AEW draws in the US. Also, I don't know why you think I was referring to you in my previous post. I don't even know who you are. I was just saying that there are many people that will defend AEW without acknowledging its flaws. Every company will have flaws. Simple as that. That is not the equivalent of being a mainstay draw. Not even close. They sold out MSG because that was a huge thing for New Japan to be doing a big show in America, meaning people would travel from around the country to go see it. Also they were partnered with RoH then. Much like All In was. It's a whole different ball game when you are touring and doing weekly shows. Capitalizing a word will not make the point any more valid. Show me the "fact" that new japan draws more than AEW in the US? AEW sold out PPV's in 4 minutes flat, sold out multiple TV episode shows in 10'000 + buildings, and signed a 4 year TV deal within 6 months of being on TV. How has New Japan done more than that in the US? We aren't talking about AEW drawing anywhere but the USA right now? They are an American based company touring in America. Why in the world would I be talking about their ability to draw in Japan? You are clearly misunderstanding why I'm pointing out that New Japan is not the same draw in America as it is in Japan. The point is that the promotions cater to their audiences. NJPW is made for a Japanese cultured audience. AEW (& WWE) are made for American based audiences . Not a single person here has ever said AEW didn't have flaws. We disagreed with your flaws and pointed out why we disagreed. Simple as that. I posted tons in that thread with long, well thought out and well reasoned posts. You ignored the overwhelming majority of it.
|
|
voicesinmyhead
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 4, 2009 19:21:00 GMT -5
Posts: 1,594
|
Post by voicesinmyhead on Jun 26, 2020 19:17:12 GMT -5
If you watch and follow all kinds of wrestling then you would know that New Japan DOES draw in the US. They sold out MSG in one day and have held a ton of shows in California. They draw here, not just in Japan. And to say that it isn't enough to just draw in Japan is silly. There is no evidence to show that AEW would draw anywhere outside the US right now so the US is technically the only spot that they draw as well. AND, it is a fact that New Japan draws more in Japan than AEW draws in the US. Also, I don't know why you think I was referring to you in my previous post. I don't even know who you are. I was just saying that there are many people that will defend AEW without acknowledging its flaws. Every company will have flaws. Simple as that. That is not the equivalent of being a mainstay draw. Not even close. They sold out MSG because that was a huge thing for New Japan to be doing a big show in America, meaning people would travel from around the country to go see it. Also they were partnered with RoH then. Much like All In was. It's a whole different ball game when you are touring and doing weekly shows. Capitalizing a word will not make the point any more valid. Show me the "fact" that new japan draws more than AEW in the US? AEW sold out PPV's in 4 minutes flat, sold out multiple TV episode shows in 10'000 + buildings, and signed a 4 year TV deal within 6 months of being on TV. How has New Japan done more than that in the US? We aren't talking about AEW drawing anywhere but the USA right now? They are an American based company touring in America. Why in the world would I be talking about their ability to draw in Japan? You are clearly misunderstanding why I'm pointing out that New Japan is not the same draw in America as it is in Japan. The point is that the promotions cater to their audiences. NJPW is made for a Japanese cultured audience. AEW (& WWE) are made for American based audiences . Not a single person here has ever said AEW didn't have flaws. We disagreed with your flaws and pointed out why we disagreed. Simple as that. I posted tons in that thread with long, well thought out and well reasoned posts. You ignored the overwhelming majority of it. Funny because some of the points the OP made in this thread are things I brought up as well. Anywho, just like my post from a month ago, you seem to have not read my post here correctly. I did not say that New Japan draws more in the US than AEW draws in the US. I said New Japan draws more in JAPAN than AEW draws in the US. And I like how you use the word mainstay. That would cannot be applied to a company that is not even a year old. However, New Japan is indeed a MAINSTAY in Japan. Also, ROH did very little to help sell out MSG. I was at the show and it was clear as day that the people were there to see New Japan stars. Not ROH stars.
|
|
|
Post by Bandalero on Jun 26, 2020 19:25:31 GMT -5
voicesinmyhead as much as you generalize all of us as being AEW marks when we openly critique the very product we all like, you sound like a hell of a New Japan mark yourself. "Wrestling/Wrasslin" fell off the marquee a long long time ago, maybe catch-as-catch-can wrestling and fisty cuffs rocks your boat - you do you. A 100% pure wrestling weekly show will never be successful in a north american market.
|
|
|
Post by warriorlynx on Jun 26, 2020 19:28:48 GMT -5
I think its terrible, when I first heard about it I thought it was going to be good old wrestling and more serious and less comedic like WWE. Kinda like ROH only upped in scale/production. Instead I get Orange Cassidy, Jungle Boy, Luchasarus....its crap. Jim Cornette is the only voice of reason out there saying what is wrong with the wrestling shows today and no one is listening. WE WANT WRESTLING BACK!! Jim Cornette does make a few valid points about AEW, but most of it comes off of the gimmick he still portrays and he craps on it so much Truth is since 1978 when age curfews started fading from MSG the wrestling product started to become more targeted for kids and Vince McMahon took it to a whole new level in the 80s. You have to have characters like them to attract kids and buy merch, it would be a bad business decision in the wrestling business not to have them at all.
|
|
voicesinmyhead
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 4, 2009 19:21:00 GMT -5
Posts: 1,594
|
Post by voicesinmyhead on Jun 26, 2020 19:29:22 GMT -5
voicesinmyhead as much as you generalize all of us as being AEW marks when we openly critique the very product we all like, you sound like a hell of a New Japan mark yourself. You do you. I didn't even call anyone a mark specifically. I told the OP to be careful of the marks that will rip him apart. You didn't rip him apart so you are not one of the "marks" I am talking about. All of you need to calm down. The fact that you are getting so defensive over that word, even when I didn't say you were one, is pathetic. Also, I guess you don't have anything to say about New Japan doing well in other countries? I am not a New Japan mark. I just don't like when people speak flat-out lies.
|
|
voicesinmyhead
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 4, 2009 19:21:00 GMT -5
Posts: 1,594
|
Post by voicesinmyhead on Jun 26, 2020 19:31:29 GMT -5
I think its terrible, when I first heard about it I thought it was going to be good old wrestling and more serious and less comedic like WWE. Kinda like ROH only upped in scale/production. Instead I get Orange Cassidy, Jungle Boy, Luchasarus....its crap. Jim Cornette is the only voice of reason out there saying what is wrong with the wrestling shows today and no one is listening. WE WANT WRESTLING BACK!! Jim Cornette does make a few valid points about AEW, but most of it comes off of the gimmick he still portrays and he craps on it so much Truth is since 1978 when age curfews started fading from MSG the wrestling product started to become more targeted for kids and Vince McMahon took it to a whole new level in the 80s. You have to have characters like them to attract kids and buy merch, it would be a bad business decision in the wrestling business not to have them at all. I completely understand your point, but AEW does not even go after that demographic. They are clearly looking to gain viewers from the 18-49 age group. I rarely even see kids in attendance at their shows (when fans were a thing).
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 23, 2024 4:59:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2020 19:35:12 GMT -5
I'm so glad I discovered the block button....and beer. I'd buy that t-shirt and be up for some cowboy s***.
Steering back to the original thing regarding staleness, I think there's been a shift after the first few weeks of Matt Hardy/Brodie. Brodie went to the title shot, which as far as building up non WWE stars was probably a good thing to have it be a WWE guy eat the pin to Mox there. Now he's focused more on leading the Dark Order and playing that character, which could do a lot to help young guys get over. (I'm thinking further ahead on that one when members eventually start leaving or turning on him, or perhaps the group falls apart all together, who knows). Matt mentoring Private Party. They're starting to shift that WWE talent over to roles where they can keep helping boost younger guys. Jericho's been doing it from the start, but that's because Jericho is so damn good he can literally be a great old school heel world champion while simultaneously boosting up a ton of younger talent in the company without losing any credibility. Those first few weeks after those two debuted I definitely get what you mean, though it was also when they had a super limited roster and most of the Elite wasn't available, none of the New York crew, etc. I feel like we're starting to see how those two fit in with a fuller roster, and it's still leaving room for the younger guys to grow.
I kinda put FTR into a different category, since they are a very rare exception for WWE talent coming over and being big players, but that's something that's been hyped long before AEW started, and FTR special enough for that. If we start seeing all those random releases showing up and taking over, things could definitely go south. I really don't see it happening though. The Fyter Fest card is pretty big on boosting non-WWE talent, TNT match aside. That Jericho match will do every bit as much for OC as the PAC match did, which was a heck of a lot.
|
|
|
Post by Bandalero on Jun 26, 2020 19:36:17 GMT -5
voicesinmyhead as much as you generalize all of us as being AEW marks when we openly critique the very product we all like, you sound like a hell of a New Japan mark yourself. You do you. I didn't even call anyone a mark specifically. I told the OP to be careful of the marks that will rip him apart. You didn't rip him apart so you are not one of the "marks" I am talking about. All of you need to calm down. The fact that you are getting so defensive over that word, even when I didn't say you were one, is pathetic. Also, I guess you don't have anything to say about New Japan doing well in other countries? I am not a New Japan mark. I just don't like when people speak flat-out lies. Is there a market for a production like New Japan? Of course there is, it's a widely successful MAINSTAY in Japan. And yes they are going to sell out one-off shows in MSG, Australia or wherever else the promote a novelty like that. All I'm saying is that wrestling is more than, well wrestling. I call it a male soap opera; there has to be drama, comedy, entertainment - especially in a North American market. You are flat-out wrong if you thought AEW would be the extreme alternate to WWE; it would fold in less than 6 months. That is not the business model this market wants or needs quite frankly. AEW has done tremendously in a year, all things considered. I too want them to move away from all that gaga bits right now because they are walking a fine line of being a parody fed. But they have quality wrestlers on the roster too.
|
|
voicesinmyhead
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 4, 2009 19:21:00 GMT -5
Posts: 1,594
|
Post by voicesinmyhead on Jun 26, 2020 19:49:17 GMT -5
I didn't even call anyone a mark specifically. I told the OP to be careful of the marks that will rip him apart. You didn't rip him apart so you are not one of the "marks" I am talking about. All of you need to calm down. The fact that you are getting so defensive over that word, even when I didn't say you were one, is pathetic. Also, I guess you don't have anything to say about New Japan doing well in other countries? I am not a New Japan mark. I just don't like when people speak flat-out lies. Is there a market for a production like New Japan? Of course there is, it's a widely successful MAINSTAY in Japan. And yes they are going to sell out one-off shows in MSG, Australia or wherever else the promote a novelty like that. All I'm saying is that wrestling is more than, well wrestling. I call it a male soap opera; there has to be drama, comedy, entertainment - especially in a North American market. You are flat-out wrong if you thought AEW would be the extreme alternate to WWE; it would fold in less than 6 months. That is not the business model this market wants or needs quite frankly. AEW has done tremendously in a year, all things considered. I too want them to move away from all that gaga bits right now because they are walking a fine line of being a parody fed. But they have quality wrestlers on the roster too. I agree with almost everything you said there. I do think they have done well for themselves, but like you said, they need to be careful because they are really starting to get into that parody territory. The only thing I do not agree with is that if AEW was the "extreme alternative," then it would fold in six months. People are following and tuning into AEW because of their roster and for solid matches. The same fans would be watching if it was a pure wrestling company as well.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 23, 2024 4:59:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2020 21:43:18 GMT -5
So the only quarterly numbers that were available so far were the last 30 minutes, where aew got destroyed with only 522k vs 830k or something around there. That would be Matt Hardy match and the Jericho segment. Reason I mention it in this thread is obviously the talk of the WWE guys and staleness.
|
|
toki
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 7, 2017 16:50:47 GMT -5
Posts: 4,101
|
Post by toki on Jun 26, 2020 21:58:59 GMT -5
So the only quarterly numbers that were available so far were the last 30 minutes, where aew got destroyed with only 522k vs 830k or something around there. That would be Matt Hardy match and the Jericho segment. Reason I mention it in this thread is obviously the talk of the WWE guys and staleness. i don't watch wwe anymore but sort of keep up with it from dirtsheets and what i read here, i guess? i'm assuming the title deal was the main event for nxt tho. so comparing that to santana vs matt hardy is a no brainer as far as ratings go. and even if it wasn't, i still wouldn't be surprised. matt hardy does not = ratings in 2020. the main event segments were that match and jericho/orange on aew. i'd bet that whatever nxt had was just one thing until the end of the show, so whoever was watching stuck around instead of flipping over to try and catch the last bit of dynamite. either way, i don't really care about the ratings. pick one, watch both, whatever. enjoy what you want, just dont bash others for liking something more. btw, not calling you out for this, dude. just saying in general. no need to be toxic to each other over a tv show.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 23, 2024 4:59:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2020 22:33:29 GMT -5
No, no don't worry I didn't take it like that. The main reason I brought it up was because it was somewhat circumstantial evidence that yes, like you just said, Matt Hardy =/= ratings in 2020, which fit in well with the original theme of the thread. And yeah, the title match was the headliner for NXT, and it was a decent match. Ultimately the ratings matter for the people in charge, but that's about it. Even then, straight from Tony Khan's mouth, they get paid for 18-49 demo, and nothing else really matters that much.
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Jun 26, 2020 23:45:34 GMT -5
AEW has proven they’re willing to change courses drastically. I think they’re trying to feel Matt out as a talent and seeing what people like and don’t - hopefully these ratings let them know that we do not need a show main evented by Matt Hardy in 2020.
|
|