The People's Poet
Superstar
“Alright, if I'm a virgin, how come I know what a girl's bottom looks like?”
Joined on: Apr 27, 2014 9:29:47 GMT -5
Posts: 752
|
Post by The People's Poet on Jun 2, 2023 6:12:29 GMT -5
I'm totally pissed off with Wrestling Trader to be honest. I'm still waiting on the original Dynamite & Blue Haystacks figures. Last I was told… “Thanks for your email and apologies for the delay in responding. We recently posted an updated about an unexpected delay to orders with Blue Haystacks. Unfortunately, a lot of the stock we inherited of these was significantly damaged, so we are currently waiting for replacements from the factory. These are due in soon so we’ll get your items to you as soon as we can. I appreciate the wait is frustrating, and we are grateful for your patience.” You know when I received this this response? APRIL 6TH! & nothing since. Because the new blue Stacks aren't in yet. Chill man. You could have opted for loose if you were in a hurry Thank you for the advice, but I will “chill” when I receive my purchases made One & a half years ago (Jan 5 2022).
|
|
@Chair.Shot
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
Joined on: Jan 31, 2012 4:38:24 GMT -5
Posts: 4,870
|
Post by @Chair.Shot on Jun 2, 2023 8:12:34 GMT -5
Because the new blue Stacks aren't in yet. Chill man. You could have opted for loose if you were in a hurry Thank you for the advice, but I will “chill” when I receive my purchases made One & a half years ago (Jan 5 2022). What do you want them to do about it? Send you a refund? Go for it. Send you items in damaged packaging? Doubt it. So your options are to…chill or wait in anger.
|
|
rtec1
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Jun 25, 2011 15:13:06 GMT -5
Posts: 315
|
Post by rtec1 on Jun 2, 2023 8:43:53 GMT -5
Because the new blue Stacks aren't in yet. Chill man. You could have opted for loose if you were in a hurry Thank you for the advice, but I will “chill” when I receive my purchases made One & a half years ago (Jan 5 2022). I get your frustrations but it’s just extremely unfortunate what happened with the figures turning up damaged. That’s out of WT’s hands. They have given you options and it seems like you’ve opted to wait so it is what it is.
|
|
walter7paisley
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 9, 2022 17:57:13 GMT -5
Posts: 1,713
|
Post by walter7paisley on Jun 2, 2023 15:59:00 GMT -5
Because the new blue Stacks aren't in yet. Chill man. You could have opted for loose if you were in a hurry Thank you for the advice, but I will “chill” when I receive my purchases made One & a half years ago (Jan 5 2022). I feel you, mate. I was in the same boat with my Chella orders, had white Dynamite, blue Haystacks and Daddy on order forever, and eventually, on my second request, got a full refund... Then months later I received my order, so I can't complain! What I would say is if you're absolutely fed up, put a refund request in. I would also recommend waiting a little longer, as Daddy and Haystacks do look great on card.
|
|
britishbrickfan
Superstar
Joined on: Aug 19, 2019 7:02:28 GMT -5
Posts: 980
|
Post by britishbrickfan on Jun 6, 2023 3:33:15 GMT -5
I would also recommend waiting a little longer, as Daddy and Haystacks do look great on card. I actually opened both of my Haystacks and Daddy figures, because I wanted loose ones, but also made a Daddy vs Haystacks "wall display" (put the figures inside an Ikea frame, with a poster as the background) and I'm doing the same for the nWo now, because they'd look good in a black box with a white background
frustrating part is - I now want another MOC Daddy because it does look good on the card LOL!
|
|
walter7paisley
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 9, 2022 17:57:13 GMT -5
Posts: 1,713
|
Post by walter7paisley on Jun 6, 2023 5:04:00 GMT -5
I would also recommend waiting a little longer, as Daddy and Haystacks do look great on card. I actually opened both of my Haystacks and Daddy figures, because I wanted loose ones, but also made a Daddy vs Haystacks "wall display" (put the figures inside an Ikea frame, with a poster as the background) and I'm doing the same for the nWo now, because they'd look good in a black box with a white background
frustrating part is - I now want another MOC Daddy because it does look good on the card LOL!
Tbh thst display does sound great, and I'm generally a loose collector when it comes to wrestling figures, I'm not sure why, I just find I want to mess about with them more as I spent so many years as a kid playing with them, lol. I've kept my Daddy, white Dynamite and Haystacks on their cards and in the protective wrappers they came in, but everything within me tells me to open them up.
|
|
@Chair.Shot
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
Joined on: Jan 31, 2012 4:38:24 GMT -5
Posts: 4,870
|
Post by @Chair.Shot on Jun 13, 2023 13:34:20 GMT -5
There were some pretty unpleasant overtures from the MWFP last week regarding Epic Toys. Nothing was really expounded upon but there was a small rant regarding companies who use pre-order sales to fund the current production costs. I believe the phrase “rob Peter to pay Paul” was used.
|
|
cheville2001
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Aug 11, 2022 4:38:02 GMT -5
Posts: 176
|
Post by cheville2001 on Jun 13, 2023 16:33:54 GMT -5
There were some pretty unpleasant overtures from the MWFP last week regarding Epic Toys. Nothing was really expounded upon but there was a small rant regarding companies who use pre-order sales to fund the current production costs. I believe the phrase “rob Peter to pay Paul” was used. I kinda get that though, whatever company we've bought figures from, how long have we had to wait to get these figures?
|
|
3poajamie
Superstar
Joined on: Dec 1, 2022 17:45:37 GMT -5
Posts: 658
|
Post by 3poajamie on Jun 13, 2023 16:48:33 GMT -5
There were some pretty unpleasant overtures from the MWFP last week regarding Epic Toys. Nothing was really expounded upon but there was a small rant regarding companies who use pre-order sales to fund the current production costs. I believe the phrase “rob Peter to pay Paul” was used. Was worse that it had zero context to it, it’s more paying Peter because Paul didn’t cough up and it’s caused massive delays trying to sort. But guess that was too complicated for them to explain
|
|
bazjones
Jobber
Joined on: Oct 28, 2022 4:55:43 GMT -5
Posts: 7
|
Post by bazjones on Jun 13, 2023 16:51:25 GMT -5
There were some pretty unpleasant overtures from the MWFP last week regarding Epic Toys. Nothing was really expounded upon but there was a small rant regarding companies who use pre-order sales to fund the current production costs. I believe the phrase “rob Peter to pay Paul” was used. Felt like incredibly poor reporting on MWFP behalf. Epic (Chella) haven’t put a pre-order up since taking over the company, whilst saying repeatedly they will fund the projects as far as they can before dropping them for pre-order, even going as far as holding off pre-orders until Series 2 has shipped from factory. Not sure where they get their information from, or if they are even bothering to look at what’s being wrote for them to say.
|
|
Jackass Pacific
Main Eventer
WF 20 Year Member
Joined on: Dec 22, 2001 22:58:55 GMT -5
Posts: 3,282
|
Post by Jackass Pacific on Jun 13, 2023 20:41:14 GMT -5
There were some pretty unpleasant overtures from the MWFP last week regarding Epic Toys. Nothing was really expounded upon but there was a small rant regarding companies who use pre-order sales to fund the current production costs. I believe the phrase “rob Peter to pay Paul” was used. but...aren't they big supporters of zombie? seems pretty hypocritical...
|
|
britishbrickfan
Superstar
Joined on: Aug 19, 2019 7:02:28 GMT -5
Posts: 980
|
Post by britishbrickfan on Jun 14, 2023 0:33:35 GMT -5
There were some pretty unpleasant overtures from the MWFP last week regarding Epic Toys. Nothing was really expounded upon but there was a small rant regarding companies who use pre-order sales to fund the current production costs. I believe the phrase “rob Peter to pay Paul” was used. but...aren't they big supporters of zombie? seems pretty hypocritical... they don't care about being hypocrites, but they are right - preordering is a joke now, Hasstel has actually come through on the timescales and delivered before his were expected to be. Epic are now saying there's been a "delay" with the factory and their figures are not shipping yet. so those who were expecting Haku and co in the coming weeks aren't going to see them for some time (yet again)
but no-one is above criticism here - Zombie's timelines move constantly, and he can't even deliver his own plans. planned "SDCC exclusives" that aren't available in time for SDCC..... that's just crapplanning all round
|
|
cheville2001
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Aug 11, 2022 4:38:02 GMT -5
Posts: 176
|
Post by cheville2001 on Jun 14, 2023 3:39:11 GMT -5
There were some pretty unpleasant overtures from the MWFP last week regarding Epic Toys. Nothing was really expounded upon but there was a small rant regarding companies who use pre-order sales to fund the current production costs. I believe the phrase “rob Peter to pay Paul” was used. but...aren't they big supporters of zombie? seems pretty hypocritical... Guessing only because Zombie makes figures of them.....
|
|
walter7paisley
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 9, 2022 17:57:13 GMT -5
Posts: 1,713
|
Post by walter7paisley on Jun 14, 2023 4:28:32 GMT -5
There were some pretty unpleasant overtures from the MWFP last week regarding Epic Toys. Nothing was really expounded upon but there was a small rant regarding companies who use pre-order sales to fund the current production costs. I believe the phrase “rob Peter to pay Paul” was used. They're not wrong to certain extents, although it's simply just crowdfunding, rather than "robbing Peter to pay Paul", but them not getting the true meaning of that phrase isn't too surprising as they're hardly the brightest stars in the sky, as evidenced by their inability to see their own hypocrisy and blatant contradiction.
|
|
|
Post by micco on Jun 14, 2023 5:20:29 GMT -5
There were some pretty unpleasant overtures from the MWFP last week regarding Epic Toys. Nothing was really expounded upon but there was a small rant regarding companies who use pre-order sales to fund the current production costs. I believe the phrase “rob Peter to pay Paul” was used. They're not wrong to certain extents, although it's simply just crowdfunding, rather than "robbing Peter to pay Paul", but them not getting the true meaning of that phrase isn't too surprising as they're hardly the brightest stars in the sky, as evidenced by their inability to see their own hypocrisy and blatant contradiction. Actually, the use of that colloquialism is completely appropriate. It doesn’t necessarily mean anyone is getting robbed. It often just refers to becoming indebted to one person in order to clear a debt with another. Yeah, that’s what crowdfunding is too so the expression has always been applicable. Ironically, this feels like an actual robbery since after this amount of time it seems doubtful I’ll ever get the Sabu that I paid them for.
|
|
walter7paisley
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 9, 2022 17:57:13 GMT -5
Posts: 1,713
|
Post by walter7paisley on Jun 14, 2023 5:29:03 GMT -5
They're not wrong to certain extents, although it's simply just crowdfunding, rather than "robbing Peter to pay Paul", but them not getting the true meaning of that phrase isn't too surprising as they're hardly the brightest stars in the sky, as evidenced by their inability to see their own hypocrisy and blatant contradiction. Actually, the use of that colloquialism is completely appropriate. It doesn’t necessarily mean anyone is getting robbed. It often just refers to becoming indebted to one person in order to clear a debt with another. Yeah, that’s what crowdfunding is too so the expression has always been applicable. Ironically, this feels like an actual robbery since after this amount of time it seems doubtful I’ll ever get the Sabu that I paid them for. It depends, as the most common definition seems to be: "To harm one person in order to do good to another; by extension, to use money or resources set aside for one purpose for a different one." Or alternatively: "To rob Peter to pay Paul", or other versions that have developed over the centuries such as "to borrow from Peter to pay Paul", and "to unclothe Peter to clothe Paul", are phrases meaning to take from one person or thing to give to another, especially when it results in the elimination of one debt by incurring another ..." Which, to be pedantic, isn't necessarily what's going on with these crowdfunding projects, as we're all aware of what's going on. It's basically a case of "do you want to see these concepts come to life in figure form? Pay now so we'll produce them and you'll get them, maybe, in 16 months time." So while it definitely is crowdfunding, it's not necessarily hoodwinking people, and we're entering into the exchange willingly of our own accord, which is why after the Chella debacle, I'm pretty much done with pre-ordering as it's a pointless and tedious experience.
|
|
|
Post by micco on Jun 14, 2023 5:54:31 GMT -5
Actually, the use of that colloquialism is completely appropriate. It doesn’t necessarily mean anyone is getting robbed. It often just refers to becoming indebted to one person in order to clear a debt with another. Yeah, that’s what crowdfunding is too so the expression has always been applicable. Ironically, this feels like an actual robbery since after this amount of time it seems doubtful I’ll ever get the Sabu that I paid them for. It depends, as the most common definition seems to be: "To harm one person in order to do good to another; by extension, to use money or resources set aside for one purpose for a different one." Or alternatively: "To rob Peter to pay Paul", or other versions that have developed over the centuries such as "to borrow from Peter to pay Paul", and "to unclothe Peter to clothe Paul", are phrases meaning to take from one person or thing to give to another, especially when it results in the elimination of one debt by incurring another ..." Which, to be pedantic, isn't necessarily what's going on with these crowdfunding projects, as we're all aware of what's going on. It's basically a case of "do you want to see these concepts come to life in figure form? Pay now so we'll produce them and you'll get them, maybe, in 16 months time." So while it definitely is crowdfunding, it's not necessarily hoodwinking people, and we're entering into the exchange willingly of our own accord, which is why after the Chella debacle, I'm pretty much done with pre-ordering as it's a pointless and tedious experience. There is definitely some hoodwinking taking place when they aren’t forthcoming about delivery dates. We know we are preordering the figure but beyond that, we have no clue what’s going on. Not to belabor the point any further, but an element of deception isn’t specified in the meaning of that expression. Even if it were, we don’t really know how those funds are being allocated, so it’s possible we have been deceived.
|
|
walter7paisley
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 9, 2022 17:57:13 GMT -5
Posts: 1,713
|
Post by walter7paisley on Jun 14, 2023 7:29:22 GMT -5
It depends, as the most common definition seems to be: "To harm one person in order to do good to another; by extension, to use money or resources set aside for one purpose for a different one." Or alternatively: "To rob Peter to pay Paul", or other versions that have developed over the centuries such as "to borrow from Peter to pay Paul", and "to unclothe Peter to clothe Paul", are phrases meaning to take from one person or thing to give to another, especially when it results in the elimination of one debt by incurring another ..." Which, to be pedantic, isn't necessarily what's going on with these crowdfunding projects, as we're all aware of what's going on. It's basically a case of "do you want to see these concepts come to life in figure form? Pay now so we'll produce them and you'll get them, maybe, in 16 months time." So while it definitely is crowdfunding, it's not necessarily hoodwinking people, and we're entering into the exchange willingly of our own accord, which is why after the Chella debacle, I'm pretty much done with pre-ordering as it's a pointless and tedious experience. There is definitely some hoodwinking taking place when they aren’t forthcoming about delivery dates. We know we are preordering the figure but beyond that, we have no clue what’s going on. Not to belabor the point any further, but an element of deception isn’t specified in the meaning of that expression. Even if it were, we don’t really know how those funds are being allocated, so it’s possible we have been deceived. I don't totally disagree, but I don't necessarily feel that anything nefarious is taking place, or that we're being misled. It's basically a case of them needing our money in order to make the concepts that they're selling. A little like the Dragons Den, we're basically the backers, except we're not getting any cut of the profits or the business, and generally we're waiting too long for the product. I do think that these companies should be more transparent in what they're doing, which is crowdfunding. But I also feel that we should be going into these pre-orders with the knowledge that the products are gonna differ somewhat from the concepts we're being drawn in by, and that production and distribution is gonna be slow, very, very slow. Quality has often been lacking in the final product as well. Where the Major Pod prevail is in having the funds to back their own lines, but where they fall short is in their dealings with other companies who are totally crowdfunding in the same exact way that the company they're ridiculing is doing, which paints them as hypocrites, which is definitely shady behaviour. As long as the customer is actually receiving the figure they pre-ordered, with the quality that was promised, in the time specified, allowing for the odd inevitable delay, then I don't suppose it matters what their funds are being used for as long as what they paid for is delivered. That's my take, anyway.
|
|
|
Post by micco on Jun 14, 2023 9:13:49 GMT -5
There is definitely some hoodwinking taking place when they aren’t forthcoming about delivery dates. We know we are preordering the figure but beyond that, we have no clue what’s going on. Not to belabor the point any further, but an element of deception isn’t specified in the meaning of that expression. Even if it were, we don’t really know how those funds are being allocated, so it’s possible we have been deceived. I don't totally disagree, but I don't necessarily feel that anything nefarious is taking place, or that we're being misled. It's basically a case of them needing our money in order to make the concepts that they're selling. A little like the Dragons Den, we're basically the backers, except we're not getting any cut of the profits or the business, and generally we're waiting too long for the product. I do think that these companies should be more transparent in what they're doing, which is crowdfunding. But I also feel that we should be going into these pre-orders with the knowledge that the products are gonna differ somewhat from the concepts we're being drawn in by, and that production and distribution is gonna be slow, very, very slow. Quality has often been lacking in the final product as well. Where the Major Pod prevail is in having the funds to back their own lines, but where they fall short is in their dealings with other companies who are totally crowdfunding in the same exact way that the company they're ridiculing is doing, which paints them as hypocrites, which is definitely shady behaviour. As long as the customer is actually receiving the figure they pre-ordered, with the quality that was promised, in the time specified, allowing for the odd inevitable delay, then I don't suppose it matters what their funds are being used for as long as what they paid for is delivered. That's my take, anyway. Sure, but nothing is being delivered in the time specified. Which begs the question, are they misappropriating the funds in such a way that causes the delays. Hastel has proven that it’s possible to keep to a time line. How do we know that epic hasn’t cut corners to ensure a bigger profit but making for a longer turn around on production despite the time line they provided? That would be sleazy but not out of the realm of possibility.
|
|
Jonny Flashback
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 30, 2014 10:55:59 GMT -5
Posts: 1,447
|
Post by Jonny Flashback on Jun 14, 2023 10:16:53 GMT -5
I don't totally disagree, but I don't necessarily feel that anything nefarious is taking place, or that we're being misled. It's basically a case of them needing our money in order to make the concepts that they're selling. A little like the Dragons Den, we're basically the backers, except we're not getting any cut of the profits or the business, and generally we're waiting too long for the product. I do think that these companies should be more transparent in what they're doing, which is crowdfunding. But I also feel that we should be going into these pre-orders with the knowledge that the products are gonna differ somewhat from the concepts we're being drawn in by, and that production and distribution is gonna be slow, very, very slow. Quality has often been lacking in the final product as well. Where the Major Pod prevail is in having the funds to back their own lines, but where they fall short is in their dealings with other companies who are totally crowdfunding in the same exact way that the company they're ridiculing is doing, which paints them as hypocrites, which is definitely shady behaviour. As long as the customer is actually receiving the figure they pre-ordered, with the quality that was promised, in the time specified, allowing for the odd inevitable delay, then I don't suppose it matters what their funds are being used for as long as what they paid for is delivered. That's my take, anyway. Sure, but nothing is being delivered in the time specified. Which begs the question, are they misappropriating the funds in such a way that causes the delays. Hastel has proven that it’s possible to keep to a time line. How do we know that epic hasn’t cut corners to ensure a bigger profit but making for a longer turn around on production despite the time line they provided? That would be sleazy but not out of the realm of possibility. Pretty sure Epic are operating at a sizeable loss at the moment while they clear the mess that Chella left them.
|
|