Deleted
Joined on: Nov 27, 2024 22:58:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2021 15:03:46 GMT -5
Is it just me or does the time between the ‘92-‘98 Royal Rumble seem much longer than the time between ‘02-‘20.
My theory is because I watched every second of WWF between 92-98 and stopped watching in ‘02.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 27, 2024 22:58:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2021 15:46:03 GMT -5
Just watched the ‘96 Rumble, empty seats everywhere.
|
|
|
Post by MKSavage on Jan 3, 2021 18:02:14 GMT -5
Just watched the ‘96 Rumble, empty seats everywhere. WWF hadn't quite recovered yet, 1995 was a bad year and it carried over into 1996.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 27, 2024 22:58:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2021 18:08:59 GMT -5
Just watched the ‘96 Rumble, empty seats everywhere. WWF hadn't quite recovered yet, 1995 was a bad year and it carried over into 1996. I’m sure that’s been mentioned on Prichard’s podcast, can you sum up for me the reasons why business was bad? Is it as simple as loosing big names to WCW?
|
|
|
Post by MKSavage on Jan 3, 2021 18:10:45 GMT -5
Is it just me or does the time between the ‘92-‘98 Royal Rumble seem much longer than the time between ‘02-‘20. My theory is because I watched every second of WWF between 92-98 and stopped watching in ‘02. I think this has more to do with time flying faster when you are older.
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Jan 3, 2021 20:18:10 GMT -5
Didn’t you have a huge conspiracy theory post about this on the main board either last year or the year prior?
|
|
nibs92
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 29, 2008 5:47:21 GMT -5
Posts: 2,354
|
Post by nibs92 on Jan 4, 2021 2:30:03 GMT -5
Is it just me or does the time between the ‘92-‘98 Royal Rumble seem much longer than the time between ‘02-‘20. My theory is because I watched every second of WWF between 92-98 and stopped watching in ‘02. Perhaps it has to do with build up. The attitude era onwards seemed to go at 100 miles an hour.
|
|
|
Post by LA Times on Jan 4, 2021 8:57:03 GMT -5
WWF hadn't quite recovered yet, 1995 was a bad year and it carried over into 1996. I’m sure that’s been mentioned on Prichard’s podcast, can you sum up for me the reasons why business was bad? Is it as simple as loosing big names to WCW? After Summerslam 1991, when Ultimate Warrior was fired and Hulk Hogan left to make movies, to many, that was the end of the Hulkamania Era. Vince McMahon's steroid scandal made headlines and that was the only thing mainstream news would report about wrestling. The TV product was awful and guys like Duke the Dumpster and Isaac Yankem represented everything that was wrong with the New Generation Era. King Mabel was a headliner for multiple PPVs in 1995, Diesel was champion for almost the whole year and damn near put the company out of business.
|
|
|
Post by MKSavage on Jan 4, 2021 12:40:33 GMT -5
WWF hadn't quite recovered yet, 1995 was a bad year and it carried over into 1996. I’m sure that’s been mentioned on Prichard’s podcast, can you sum up for me the reasons why business was bad? Is it as simple as loosing big names to WCW? I think that is part of it, you obviously need stars to attract viewers. I think that the majority of the big names that made wrestling huge in the 80s were no longer wrestling, or only wrestling part time, and the new wrestlers just didn't reach mass appeal. In 1995, I felt that the top guys in the WWF were really good, and could complete with any other era's top stars, but the roster had no depth. Also, the tag team division was terrible. And, they had a lot of really terrible gimmicks that even some of the best workers couldn't do anything with. One thing that I also didn't like was, the WWF in 1995 was very baby face heavy, for a time period between WM11 and Summer Slam, most of the top guys in the company were baby faces; Diesel, Shawn, Razor, Bret, Davey Boy, Lex, Taker, Bam Bam Bigelow, which meant they didn't have a lot of good heels to face off against. Another thing, I think a lot of the kids that were huge fans in the 80s were now teenagers in the 90s and the same formula that worked for younger fans did not work for older fans. I think that is why the attitude era really hit big, a lot of the fans were now teenagers/young adults, and the more colorful language, scantily clad women, and hardcore style appealed more to what they liked than the overly gimmicked characters and corny storylines of the early/mid 90s. Also, you have to take into account a lot of the scandals at the beginning of the 90s; wrestlers were dying early (either from drug abuse or steroid abuse), there was the steroid trial, and the ring boy sex thing; there was a stain on professional wrestling in the early 90s that didn't help. I can remember friends who I knew were wrestling fans but they wouldn't really talk about wrestling around people because they weren't sure what people would say.
|
|
|
Post by stc13 on Jan 4, 2021 13:18:36 GMT -5
I’m sure that’s been mentioned on Prichard’s podcast, can you sum up for me the reasons why business was bad? Is it as simple as loosing big names to WCW? I think that is part of it, you obviously need stars to attract viewers. I think that the majority of the big names that made wrestling huge in the 80s were no longer wrestling, or only wrestling part time, and the new wrestlers just didn't reach mass appeal. In 1995, I felt that the top guys in the WWF were really good, and could complete with any other era's top stars, but the roster had no depth. Also, the tag team division was terrible. And, they had a lot of really terrible gimmicks that even some of the best workers couldn't do anything with. One thing that I also didn't like was, the WWF in 1995 was very baby face heavy, for a time period between WM11 and Summer Slam, most of the top guys in the company were baby faces; Diesel, Shawn, Razor, Bret, Davey Boy, Lex, Taker, Bam Bam Bigelow, which meant they didn't have a lot of good heels to face off against. Another thing, I think a lot of the kids that were huge fans in the 80s were now teenagers in the 90s and the same formula that worked for younger fans did not work for older fans. I think that is why the attitude era really hit big, a lot of the fans were now teenagers/young adults, and the more colorful language, scantily clad women, and hardcore style appealed more to what they liked than the overly gimmicked characters and corny storylines of the early/mid 90s. Also, you have to take into account a lot of the scandals at the beginning of the 90s; wrestlers were dying early (either from drug abuse or steroid abuse), there was the steroid trial, and the ring boy sex thing; there was a stain on professional wrestling in the early 90s that didn't help. I can remember friends who I knew were wrestling fans but they wouldn't really talk about wrestling around people because they weren't sure what people would say. I have been doing a re-watch of WWF and WCW starting January '95, and I just finished 1995 last week. It was really interesting watching with fresh eyes vs what I remembered as a kid at the time. You're spot on about the lack of compelling heels. As 1995 wraps up, your title feud is Bret/Taker/Diesel, who are all still solidly babyfaces. Michaels was basically a tweener or babyface the entire year, even though he was treated as a bit of a heel early in the year. So beyond that? You have Sid, a rushed and incoherent turn from Davey Boy, and Owen (who had been pushed through 94, and then sort of forgotten about until late 95, losing all momentum). Yoko was still a top heel, but had put on too much weight to be able to wrestles in singles matches or do much beyond rest holds and one or two spots. They tried and failed to build a new monster in Mabel. Bam Bam went from main eventing WM as a heel to a random face turn, and then out of the picture in a matter of months. And beyond that you had a rogues gallery of heels that popped up but were never built, who made up Bret Hart's year - feuds with Hakushi, Lawler, Yankem, Jean Pierre Lafitte. It's a testament to how great a worker Bret is that he put on some really good matches with Hakushi and Jean Pierre. Really good workers, but their characters had zero build to get over with the crowd. The talent roster wasn't super deep, but the booking was also pretty bad and they misused a lot of the talent they had. Diesel was pushed as this white meat babyface who gave these long-winded, morally righteous promos and was shown in packages at celebrity softball events. Totally off-brand for the character. There were too many wrestlers turning, and doing so with little to no build. Hakushi, 123 Kid, BamBam, and Davey all had poorly executed turns that were tough to follow at times. And they spent a ton of tv time and energy pushing guys like Savio Vega, Mabel, Henry Godwin. PPV cards were filled with matches that didn't even have a feud behind them, and just felt thrown on the card, or were built exclusively on Superstars. Vince was using his same playbook that he had used for years, but the talent wasn't there to make it work or cover up the flaws. By comparison, WCW's show felt fresh and still holds up decently today in terms of production, presentation, etc. They were giving away free matches every week with top talent (Sting, Flair, some Hogan) with decisive finishes, were WWF was still doing a lot of DQ, count out, etc finishes in their weekly main events to build to PPV. There were a handful of matches that I would call "good" on RAW throughout 95, and most of them didn't have a clean finish that really dinged the match for me. But most of the show was straight up squash matches with jobbers still. WCW had good, competitive, matches with name wrestlers, solid undercard storylines, and an overall decent product that was bogged down at the top by the tail end of Hogan and the Dungeon of Doom feud. But on the whole the show felt cool, energetic, and were airing live shows from all over the country with hot crowds. WWF was taping 3/4 weeks at a time in some really small arenas with crowds who basically only came to life for Bret, HBK, and Burger King chants. And you can totally feel that energy through the tv. As a kid, 1995 WWF has a lot of fond memories for me. But it was legitimately tough to re-watch. It's bad tv. And in that light, it's sort of amazing how much things turn around by 96/97.
|
|
|
Post by jason88cubs on Jan 4, 2021 14:08:52 GMT -5
i think its too predictable now
|
|
|
Post by MKSavage on Jan 4, 2021 16:07:35 GMT -5
I think that is part of it, you obviously need stars to attract viewers. I think that the majority of the big names that made wrestling huge in the 80s were no longer wrestling, or only wrestling part time, and the new wrestlers just didn't reach mass appeal. In 1995, I felt that the top guys in the WWF were really good, and could complete with any other era's top stars, but the roster had no depth. Also, the tag team division was terrible. And, they had a lot of really terrible gimmicks that even some of the best workers couldn't do anything with. One thing that I also didn't like was, the WWF in 1995 was very baby face heavy, for a time period between WM11 and Summer Slam, most of the top guys in the company were baby faces; Diesel, Shawn, Razor, Bret, Davey Boy, Lex, Taker, Bam Bam Bigelow, which meant they didn't have a lot of good heels to face off against. Another thing, I think a lot of the kids that were huge fans in the 80s were now teenagers in the 90s and the same formula that worked for younger fans did not work for older fans. I think that is why the attitude era really hit big, a lot of the fans were now teenagers/young adults, and the more colorful language, scantily clad women, and hardcore style appealed more to what they liked than the overly gimmicked characters and corny storylines of the early/mid 90s. Also, you have to take into account a lot of the scandals at the beginning of the 90s; wrestlers were dying early (either from drug abuse or steroid abuse), there was the steroid trial, and the ring boy sex thing; there was a stain on professional wrestling in the early 90s that didn't help. I can remember friends who I knew were wrestling fans but they wouldn't really talk about wrestling around people because they weren't sure what people would say. I have been doing a re-watch of WWF and WCW starting January '95, and I just finished 1995 last week. It was really interesting watching with fresh eyes vs what I remembered as a kid at the time. You're spot on about the lack of compelling heels. As 1995 wraps up, your title feud is Bret/Taker/Diesel, who are all still solidly babyfaces. Michaels was basically a tweener or babyface the entire year, even though he was treated as a bit of a heel early in the year. So beyond that? You have Sid, a rushed and incoherent turn from Davey Boy, and Owen (who had been pushed through 94, and then sort of forgotten about until late 95, losing all momentum). Yoko was still a top heel, but had put on too much weight to be able to wrestles in singles matches or do much beyond rest holds and one or two spots. They tried and failed to build a new monster in Mabel. Bam Bam went from main eventing WM as a heel to a random face turn, and then out of the picture in a matter of months. And beyond that you had a rogues gallery of heels that popped up but were never built, who made up Bret Hart's year - feuds with Hakushi, Lawler, Yankem, Jean Pierre Lafitte. It's a testament to how great a worker Bret is that he put on some really good matches with Hakushi and Jean Pierre. Really good workers, but their characters had zero build to get over with the crowd. The talent roster wasn't super deep, but the booking was also pretty bad and they misused a lot of the talent they had. Diesel was pushed as this white meat babyface who gave these long-winded, morally righteous promos and was shown in packages at celebrity softball events. Totally off-brand for the character. There were too many wrestlers turning, and doing so with little to no build. Hakushi, 123 Kid, BamBam, and Davey all had poorly executed turns that were tough to follow at times. And they spent a ton of tv time and energy pushing guys like Savio Vega, Mabel, Henry Godwin. PPV cards were filled with matches that didn't even have a feud behind them, and just felt thrown on the card, or were built exclusively on Superstars. Vince was using his same playbook that he had used for years, but the talent wasn't there to make it work or cover up the flaws. By comparison, WCW's show felt fresh and still holds up decently today in terms of production, presentation, etc. They were giving away free matches every week with top talent (Sting, Flair, some Hogan) with decisive finishes, were WWF was still doing a lot of DQ, count out, etc finishes in their weekly main events to build to PPV. There were a handful of matches that I would call "good" on RAW throughout 95, and most of them didn't have a clean finish that really dinged the match for me. But most of the show was straight up squash matches with jobbers still. WCW had good, competitive, matches with name wrestlers, solid undercard storylines, and an overall decent product that was bogged down at the top by the tail end of Hogan and the Dungeon of Doom feud. But on the whole the show felt cool, energetic, and were airing live shows from all over the country with hot crowds. WWF was taping 3/4 weeks at a time in some really small arenas with crowds who basically only came to life for Bret, HBK, and Burger King chants. And you can totally feel that energy through the tv. As a kid, 1995 WWF has a lot of fond memories for me. But it was legitimately tough to re-watch. It's bad tv. And in that light, it's sort of amazing how much things turn around by 96/97. Agreed, WWF felt like they were still using the old formula of not showing too much on TV, which makes sense, but they didn't have the roster depth they use to have, and WCW was trying something new. I think things could have been better if Diesel was a heel champ and you had guys like HBK, Hitman, Davey Boy, and Luger chasing him, it may have been a little better. I also think they should have tried to push Bam Bam as a monster heel, I would have put him in Mabel's place. I really didn't see the WWF/Raw getting better until the summer of 1997, by then they had some new stars to go with their past stars and the storylines were getting better. The roster also seemed a little more balanced.
|
|
|
Post by The Brain on Jan 4, 2021 17:00:00 GMT -5
Best era of the Rumble is when it had this logo...
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Jan 4, 2021 19:18:40 GMT -5
I think the last Royal Rumble I truly enjoyed was the one where Austin and Triple H were gabbed by the Hurricane for a double choke slam before they tossed him.
|
|
|
Post by MKSavage on Jan 5, 2021 9:01:16 GMT -5
I think the last Royal Rumble I truly enjoyed was the one where Austin and Triple H were gabbed by the Hurricane for a double choke slam before they tossed him. Me too. That was the last Royal Rumble I ordered on PPV, it was really good.
|
|
|
Post by JokerFC on Jan 7, 2021 12:14:37 GMT -5
I think the last Royal Rumble I truly enjoyed was the one where Austin and Triple H were gabbed by the Hurricane for a double choke slam before they tossed him. 2002. 1st signs HHHs reintroduction as a face character was starting to wear off(IMO). Good RR though even though the winner was heavily telegraphed....the card itself was pretty great IIRC. Loved Flair vs McMahon The last RR I really really enjoyed was RR2007...the final few moments between HBK & Undertaker were fantastic. Really loved the 2004 RR too. Love the ones where the winner isnt obvious. Vince tearing his quads at the RR 2005 after Cena & Batista screwed up the ending was rolled gold....absolutely fantastic stuff LOL
|
|
rateddal
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Feb 22, 2019 21:36:45 GMT -5
Posts: 337
|
Post by rateddal on Jan 8, 2021 7:43:25 GMT -5
I think the last Royal Rumble I truly enjoyed was the one where Austin and Triple H were gabbed by the Hurricane for a double choke slam before they tossed him. 2002. 1st signs HHHs reintroduction as a face character was starting to wear off(IMO). Good RR though even though the winner was heavily telegraphed....the card itself was pretty great IIRC. Loved Flair vs McMahon The last RR I really really enjoyed was RR2007...the final few moments between HBK & Undertaker were fantastic. Really loved the 2004 RR too. Love the ones where the winner isnt obvious. Vince tearing his quads at the RR 2005 after Cena & Batista screwed up the ending was rolled gold....absolutely fantastic stuff LOL To be fair, I think the Rumble is always telegraphed. The 07 ending was fun but it was clearly Taker that was winning. The lead up was ridiculously focused on #30 never winning a Rumble. The 05 Cena-Batista Rumble kind of felt like it could go either way but considering the Raw-Smackdown dynamic it definitely leaned heavily in favor of Batista and the Evolution breakup. Cena ended up in the title match anyway so it should've been obvious to me who was going to win.
|
|
|
Post by JokerFC on Jan 8, 2021 8:09:20 GMT -5
2002. 1st signs HHHs reintroduction as a face character was starting to wear off(IMO). Good RR though even though the winner was heavily telegraphed....the card itself was pretty great IIRC. Loved Flair vs McMahon The last RR I really really enjoyed was RR2007...the final few moments between HBK & Undertaker were fantastic. Really loved the 2004 RR too. Love the ones where the winner isnt obvious. Vince tearing his quads at the RR 2005 after Cena & Batista screwed up the ending was rolled gold....absolutely fantastic stuff LOL To be fair, I think the Rumble is always telegraphed. The 07 ending was fun but it was clearly Taker that was winning. The lead up was ridiculously focused on #30 never winning a Rumble. The 05 Cena-Batista Rumble kind of felt like it could go either way but considering the Raw-Smackdown dynamic it definitely leaned heavily in favor of Batista and the Evolution breakup. Cena ended up in the title match anyway so it should've been obvious to me who was going to win. Yeah that's a fair point but some years do offer some mystery. 1992 1994 1997 2004 Spring immediately to mind.
|
|
rateddal
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Feb 22, 2019 21:36:45 GMT -5
Posts: 337
|
Post by rateddal on Jan 8, 2021 9:21:35 GMT -5
94 is a great example. The fact it was double winners in a weird way was totally unpredictable and predictable at the same time. They were pushing 2 huge narratives almost equally (Bret injured, Fuji bounty on Lex and not getting another title shot) that you really didn't know who was gonna win. Of course it was both.
|
|
|
Post by JokerFC on Jan 8, 2021 10:57:35 GMT -5
Man I love the 1997 RR....absolutely brilliant booking at the time.
|
|