|
Post by Fighter Hayabusa on Apr 20, 2021 7:17:42 GMT -5
Not saying everything previously mentioned aren’t valid points but the biggest reason is because it didn’t come with a surf board.
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Apr 20, 2021 8:00:11 GMT -5
Not saying everything previously mentioned aren’t valid points but the biggest reason is because it didn’t come with a surf board. Luckily we got that with the USO’s BP and the Network Spotlight (?) Undertaker vs Sting 2-Pack.
|
|
|
Post by Fighter Hayabusa on Apr 20, 2021 8:08:43 GMT -5
Not saying everything previously mentioned aren’t valid points but the biggest reason is because it didn’t come with a surf board. Luckily we got that with the USO’s BP and the Network Spotlight (?) Undertaker vs Sting 2-Pack. Taker/Sting was Fan Central. There was also the Lucha Dragons BP. Pretty sure it was Mattel’s way of going “we know we messed up with not including this with the DM, so we’re gonna pack a surfboard in a BP with a team that never surfs to make up for it.” But all that did was make you spend $20 for a tag team you don’t want or need for a board that shoulda been included with the figure in the first place.
|
|
airbud
Superstar
"Attack me if you dare, I will crush you."
Joined on: Oct 6, 2005 2:41:33 GMT -5
Posts: 981
|
Post by airbud on Apr 20, 2021 9:49:50 GMT -5
Looking back, I guess it was worth the $7 or $8 i paid for it on a black friday sale. But yeah, I was not a fan of the giant head, sh17 face scan, massive ripped torso and arms, and chicken legs. Maybe somethings got moved around on the spreadsheet, but please Mattel fix your spreadsheet. Mattel has all the correct parts to use but they choose to use the wrong ones and put balloon heads on everything. Sad. It’s like they purposely ruin certain figures to bury certain stars.
|
|
|
Post by JC Motors on Apr 20, 2021 10:14:27 GMT -5
This was one of the few DM figures I actually passed on
|
|
Warriah'
Main Eventer
Joined on: Dec 22, 2019 19:46:02 GMT -5
Posts: 3,261
|
Post by Warriah' on Apr 20, 2021 10:24:40 GMT -5
Mediocre face sculpt and I hate, hate, hate those rubber jackets.
It was worth the like 10 quid I spent on it on ebay when it was super common, just to make sure I had a surfer sting but it was way below the quality fig it could have been.
|
|
|
Post by GreyHaze:Big Bad Booty Daddy on Apr 20, 2021 10:41:06 GMT -5
For me it was a huge disappointment being that Sting is my favorite wrestler of all time. The main reason for me is that this figure could of been easily put into the elite line. Now let’s get on to the goods. While I honestly feel that Mattel did give us some iconic eras of Sting. They really didn’t give us consistent looking Stings, if that makes any sense. You had one Sting from one era with a torso twice the size his legs, then another with thick legs and thin torso. Then you had a current day Sting with ripped arms, while the next modern one had small arms. Now going back to the DM. In terms of detail, Mattel did a great job. The reason why this figure gets a lot of hate is due to how bad it looks imo. It sort of looks like a Frankenstein of parts. The Batista torso was too big, everyone on this forum preferred the Austin torso. One thing is Sting was built, but he was not Ultimate Warrior shredded. The legs on the other hand are too thin, I personally prefer the thicker Dolph Ziggler legs (Sting had pretty thick legs). The arms work imo, since it was a time when he was pretty built. On to the headscan. I think a lot of people did not like it. For me it’s 50/50, I could see the upper part (nose etc), resembling Steve. However, the lower part and the teeth look terrible. The icing on the cake was the big rubber jacket that looks like he was ready to fly off the shelves. Had Mattel tried to use a pleather jacket, whether or not they could pull off the epaulets and tassels, it would of been slightly more presentable. I know Bill said that the tassels were impossible due to toy hazard standards, but a minor inaccuracy with thicker tassels would of been cooler imo. It’s like I said, it could of been a really nice figure. I’ve fixed mine up, but you can’t do anything about the legs, or the face. Then Mattel continued to release the same Sting formula after people criticized it. This is one of those figures I really want to like.
|
|
|
Post by rkmo: Autonomous Meat Shield on Apr 20, 2021 13:29:30 GMT -5
It and Razor killed DM sales at my old Kmart. The store never got any new ones in after being saddled with overstock for years, some were still rotting until it closed in '18.
|
|
|
Post by rastlinfigures on Apr 20, 2021 16:02:56 GMT -5
I assume it was mostly the torso choice being too ripped for him and disproportionate with the leg width.
|
|
crush
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
Yes, i know it's weird...
Joined on: Mar 8, 2012 16:07:14 GMT -5
Posts: 4,720
|
Post by crush on Apr 20, 2021 16:59:23 GMT -5
I think it's probably a better figure than it's reputation. The head is fine, and truthfully I don't mind the torso (Surfer Sting is someone who I don't particularly mind being more jacked in figure form than real life, but that's probably just me missing my childhood Galoob), but it looks way our it looks way out of proportion to the legs (which are the real issue IMO). The jacket is a shame. A cloth goods version wouldn't have looked nearly as good or as detailed, but the inability to move the arms at all in the rubber version did hurt the overall figure. (Talk about a design that could have benefited form the current arm-swapping Ultimate format).
Overall I think the figure is a C, but gets grades as an F because people wanted/expected an A for the first WWE Surfer Sting ever.
|
|
bigjohnnybadd
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Sept 18, 2016 12:35:53 GMT -5
Posts: 359
|
Post by bigjohnnybadd on Apr 20, 2021 17:57:33 GMT -5
The figure itself is what it is, but for me, I think it was the fact that it was presented as a DM with only the jacket as an accessory, and a poor one at that. I think that if the jacket was pleather and he came with the Big Gold, that would have made all the difference and the figure would have been regarded much more favorably.
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Apr 20, 2021 19:05:22 GMT -5
I know I am in the minority but I think the jacket is much better as it is than if it was made of soft goods. I think it looks more like the actual jacket than what they could have gotten from soft goods. I see nothing wrong with the way this jacket looks.
|
|
wheeljack83
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 16, 2018 23:52:48 GMT -5
Posts: 1,353
|
Post by wheeljack83 on Apr 20, 2021 22:33:51 GMT -5
I know I am in the minority but I think the jacket is much better as it is than if it was made of soft goods. I think it looks more like the actual jacket than what they could have gotten from soft goods. I see nothing wrong with the way this jacket looks. I'm just not into big molded plastic pieces for long sleeved ring attire or jackets like this.
|
|
|
Post by JokerFC on Apr 20, 2021 23:32:41 GMT -5
The torso was a gripe for me. Felt He was too big...but it's a figure I was never gonna pass
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 28, 2024 17:40:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2021 3:06:39 GMT -5
Sting is one of my favourite wrestlers, so I have the GAB and the crow DM figures. The hate for the GAB led to me being able to pick it up for around £5. I love it personally - Attire is accurate etc. Only gripe is i couldn't get the jacket off, but it's not all bad as I have it on display with Crow DM, TNA Jakks Surfer sting with the fabric jacket and Retro Sting as well I think if the Jacket was fabric, like how crow sting had a fabric trench coat, it'd be a lot more well received - but outside of that I love it.
|
|
|
Post by Rock-Is-King on Apr 21, 2021 3:53:10 GMT -5
I know I am in the minority but I think the jacket is much better as it is than if it was made of soft goods. I think it looks more like the actual jacket than what they could have gotten from soft goods. I see nothing wrong with the way this jacket looks. I would agree however the head scan could have been much better, maybe a different expression or even this one depicted better
|
|