|
|
Post by screech on Jul 23, 2021 15:08:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by MKSavage on Jul 23, 2021 15:10:27 GMT -5
Kane looks great. Taker looks good but the head sculpts are not that great. Looks like they repurposed the ghostbuster head on one of them. They should have used the head sculpt from the Bret/Taker 2-pack, the one with the teardrop tattoo under the eye.
|
|
marvelelite
Superstar
Joined on: Aug 1, 2019 2:11:34 GMT -5
Posts: 638 
|
Post by marvelelite on Jul 23, 2021 15:16:02 GMT -5
That title belt with Kane is a strange addition.
|
|
judas
Superstar
Joined on: Feb 20, 2020 7:42:06 GMT -5
Posts: 665
|
Post by judas on Jul 23, 2021 15:17:50 GMT -5
That Kane is one of his best figures ever made, just needs a beard. That Taker is awful. A complete bust. Old man taker faces done terribly, one of them looks more like Michael Jackson than Taker. The top half of his body looks ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
Post by plastictaxicab on Jul 23, 2021 15:23:16 GMT -5
I'm really excited about these. As people have mentioned though, I'm just hoping that the Taker torso looks better in-hand.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheHitmanKid on Jul 23, 2021 15:30:07 GMT -5
The top torso for Undertaker makes this figure look to exaggerated
I was hoping we were getting the Kane attire that has the mesh on the chest.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chip on Jul 23, 2021 15:34:32 GMT -5
My opinions...
Kane
Pros: Cape is amazing, shine on the boots, "molded" belt, the details are amazing. This is THE perfect Attitude Era Kane, they will never top this.
Cons: 2nd head is pointless, hope he has different hands, "C-cups" don't fit this figures needs, I really hope forgetting the details in the belt are a mistake. His torso is too muscular, needs to be "beefier"
Undertaker
Pros: Beautiful details. Love 3 different expressions for the heads, I think the cloak is a combo of plastic and cloth? if so, thats nicely done because it wont sacrifice too many details but still seem like a better item. Love that he comes with the thumb hand and a flat palm
Cons: 2 of the 3 scans look too modern, true-fx just doesn't work here, I'm pretty sure they are both re-used heads which doesnt fit the era, and the one that does looks off. Having both the wide C hands and the regular C hands is silly and a waste.
|
|
|
|
Post by Andeh on Jul 23, 2021 15:35:07 GMT -5
Taker would look much better if the top half of the torso wasn't so wide under the arms
I'll 100% be trying to get multiples of both figures.
|
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Jul 23, 2021 15:35:46 GMT -5
Kane is awesome, one of the best shown today. Taker, is good too. But I can't unsee it... |
|
|
|
Post by GreyHaze:Big Bad Booty Daddy on Jul 23, 2021 15:37:53 GMT -5
Going back to this, I think the Kane is a work of art. It might even surpass the Hollywood Hogan as best Ultimate Edition imo. Mattel really outfit themselves and finally have us tall laceless boots, a new Kane mask sculpt, bigger arms, torso and molded belt. The only thing that could of made it better would be to include the new basic head (although in my eyes, there’s something wrong about that mask shape). The UE on the other hand is all over the place. The detail and sculpt work is fantastic. However, it suffers like the UE Fiend from looking too top heavy. The proportions look odd. I also don’t like any of the scans upon further notice, they look too old and retooled. I think the Taker is one of the few guys who they keep using old scans from and retooling. I hope they try and correct some of these things.
|
|
|
|
Post by kiloinnorcal on Jul 23, 2021 15:38:13 GMT -5
Love both, getting both.
|
|
|
|
Post by LK3 on Jul 23, 2021 15:54:47 GMT -5
I don’t have complaints very often, but Taker is very disappointing IMO. All three heads are awful. As someone mentioned before two of them look too modern, and the third is Michael Jackson. The goatee is too light as well, it was pretty dark back then. The rest of it looks awesome, as does Kane. I was looking forward to getting both of these, but now that I am questioning buying Taker it’s also making me question if I need to get Kane if I’m not getting Taker. Lots of really good looking reveals today, but this one was super disappointing to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Back to the Codyverse on Jul 23, 2021 15:57:38 GMT -5
Takers torso is way weird looking. The scans are worse.
Kane is as legit a wrestling toy as I’ve ever seen!
|
|
|
|
Post by SteveHulk on Jul 23, 2021 16:07:58 GMT -5
That Kane is a masterpiece!
I like the all-round look of Taker, but - like with the UE Jeff Hardy - the beefy upper torso really lets it down... I hope this isn't becoming a "thing" with Ultimates.
|
|
|
|
Post by Evil Abed on Jul 23, 2021 16:12:20 GMT -5
Going to get both, Kane is a thing of beauty, Taker could be better, I’m trying to look past the heads but the mismatched torso sizes are killing me.
|
|
crush
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
Yes, i know it's weird...
Joined on: Mar 8, 2012 16:07:14 GMT -5
Posts: 4,720
|
Post by crush on Jul 23, 2021 16:12:20 GMT -5
Like others have said, Kane is fantastic and Taker leaves a lot to be desired.
|
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Jul 23, 2021 16:16:03 GMT -5
When did Taker start wearing mma gloves? Not 1998? Good talk.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mongo Bears on Jul 23, 2021 16:20:29 GMT -5
I need the side profile on Kane
|
|
|
|
Post by Crossfit Jesus on Jul 23, 2021 16:24:01 GMT -5
Kane looks amazing. Taker is meh
|
|
crush
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
Yes, i know it's weird...
Joined on: Mar 8, 2012 16:07:14 GMT -5
Posts: 4,720
|
Post by crush on Jul 23, 2021 16:35:22 GMT -5
When did Taker start wearing mma gloves? Not 1998? Good talk. I'm okay with the gloves on Taker. They're not 100% accurate, but his 98 gloves definitely had padding in them that makes these look close enough for me. Least of my issues with the figure.  |
|
