|
|
Post by Next Man’s Knowing Rock on Jan 29, 2022 16:51:01 GMT -5
I'll do you one better: 1. Start with SIXTY men but only thirty can enter the match, so they have to race to the ring from all over the arena and have an inside-out battle royal to begin with. 2. Every eight minutes, they are all electrocuted. 3. It's harder because they all have to wear someone else's gear and it might not fit properly. 4. The final twelve have to eat a bowl of pasta before continuing. 5. It's in a cage. Finally! The Royal Rumble is broken, it’s about damn time someone actually put some thought into ideas to make it better. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 20, 2024 6:49:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2022 8:08:59 GMT -5
67 pages of complaints but no one thinks my rules would enhance the entertainment value? Yea ok, see you next year, we will revisit.
|
|
|
|
Post by Triple S: POOR on Jan 30, 2022 8:41:21 GMT -5
67 pages of complaints but no one thinks my rules would enhance the entertainment value? Yea ok, see you next year, we will revisit. Yes. We’ve made it clear multiple times that we don’t think your rules would enhance the entertainment value. If anything, it would hinder it. |
|
Jackass Pacific
Main Eventer
WF 20 Year Member
Joined on: Dec 22, 2001 22:58:55 GMT -5
Posts: 3,150
|
Post by Jackass Pacific on Jan 30, 2022 8:57:26 GMT -5
67 pages of complaints but no one thinks my rules would enhance the entertainment value? Yea ok, see you next year, we will revisit. please just….don’t. your rules suck and wouldn’t make anything more entertaining at all. |
|
cage
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 28, 2021 13:32:07 GMT -5
Posts: 1,093
|
Post by cage on Jan 31, 2022 7:10:51 GMT -5
Why say "by invitation only"? What other way is there?
|
|
