nibs92
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 29, 2008 5:47:21 GMT -5
Posts: 2,351
|
Post by nibs92 on Aug 18, 2022 16:44:55 GMT -5
Been going through the old WWF PPV’s from 91 onwards. At the Rumble 93 just now. It’s crazy watching how much the WWF changed in that time period.
So on topic, when did you guys feel the Golden Era finished and the New Generation started. For me, looking at the Rumble 93, the Steiners make their PPV debut, Shawn was coming in to his own, other than Hogan’s brief appearances in the summer of 93, the HW belt would be traded between a new cast of characters with fresh match ups (Bret v Razor). Bam Bam also made his (re) debut at this one and Yoko won the rumble match.
Prime Time disappeared in the same month to be replaced with Monday Night Raw, which played its part in the whole landscape changing. So for me, January 93 was the true start of the NG. What do you guys think?
|
|
|
Post by jason88cubs on Aug 18, 2022 16:49:31 GMT -5
Summerslam 93 No Hogan, Warrior, Flair A new era had begun
Survivor Series 92 also had a bit of a new feel
|
|
|
Post by The Brain on Aug 19, 2022 0:06:57 GMT -5
After Mania VIII
Hogan,Jake and Piper all gone with Bret/HBK on the rise.
|
|
|
Post by hbkbigdaddycool on Aug 19, 2022 0:27:08 GMT -5
New Generation started the night Bret Hart won the WWF Title from Ric Flair in Oct. 1992.
New Generation ended at Survivor Series 97 when Bret Hart lost the WWF Title and lef the World Wrestling Federation.
|
|
|
Post by AndrewR85 on Aug 19, 2022 0:59:51 GMT -5
I would say the New Generation began around WrestleMania IX.
Golden Era mainstays like Ted DiBiase and Mr Perfect were on the card, and Tito Santana in a dark match, but there were also plenty of New Generation characters like Razor Ramon, Doink and the Headshrinkers.
|
|
|
Post by hbkjason on Aug 19, 2022 1:13:56 GMT -5
Hmm, tough to say, but I am going for it starting in Summer of 93. Most of the old guard of the last five or so years was gone. Also I'm sure it was in 1994 they started ramping up the New Generation promos I remember one where they would have like an old airplane or car and then a modern one and talk about the new WWF Generation.
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Aug 19, 2022 15:22:55 GMT -5
After Mania VIII Hogan,Jake and Piper all gone with Bret/HBK on the rise. I would say this as well.
|
|
TheEvilDoink1987
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 22, 2010 21:37:52 GMT -5
Posts: 2,807
|
Post by TheEvilDoink1987 on Aug 20, 2022 4:49:30 GMT -5
I think I'd have to go with when Bret beat Flair for his first WWF World title. To me, Bret is and always has been the face of the New Generation era so him winning that first belt was the launching point. The only awkward part of that timeline is the brief period between WrestleMania IX and King of the Ring 1993 where Hogan was again on top, but even then he felt like someone from a bygone era who didn't fit in anymore.
|
|
Warriah'
Main Eventer
Joined on: Dec 22, 2019 19:46:02 GMT -5
Posts: 3,261
|
Post by Warriah' on Aug 20, 2022 4:50:17 GMT -5
After Mania VIII Hogan,Jake and Piper all gone with Bret/HBK on the rise. Yep, look at the stark contrast in who was main eventing WM8 to who was main eventing SS92.
|
|
Warriah'
Main Eventer
Joined on: Dec 22, 2019 19:46:02 GMT -5
Posts: 3,261
|
Post by Warriah' on Aug 20, 2022 4:54:26 GMT -5
I think some people get confused when defining these specific eras. The start would be when you'd see the company moving towards what the era was at its peak.
Like how the Attitude Era was building from the Bret/Austin feud in late 96/97. It wasn't in full swing until 98 but 96/97 is when it started.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 27, 2024 0:34:50 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 20, 2022 9:38:00 GMT -5
I think I'd have to go with when Bret beat Flair for his first WWF World title. To me, Bret is and always has been the face of the New Generation era so him winning that first belt was the launching point. The only awkward part of that timeline is the brief period between WrestleMania IX and King of the Ring 1993 where Hogan was again on top, but even then he felt like someone from a bygone era who didn't fit in anymore. this for me as well
|
|
|
Post by Grenouille on Aug 20, 2022 14:15:43 GMT -5
I think I'd have to go with when Bret beat Flair for his first WWF World title. To me, Bret is and always has been the face of the New Generation era so him winning that first belt was the launching point. The only awkward part of that timeline is the brief period between WrestleMania IX and King of the Ring 1993 where Hogan was again on top, but even then he felt like someone from a bygone era who didn't fit in anymore. I couldn't agree more. It's the end that's much murkier to me.
|
|
|
Post by MKSavage on Aug 20, 2022 15:50:09 GMT -5
I usually go with 1993. Savage, Flair, Hogan, Piper, et all, were pretty much done/gone/finishing up. And we saw the rise of Bret, Shawn, Taker, Razor, Doink, Luger, Yokozuna, etc.
|
|
|
Post by CM Tusk on Aug 20, 2022 21:07:07 GMT -5
Personally see the New Generation starting at King Of The Ring 93 when Hogan left and ending at Survivor Series 97 when Bret left.
|
|
|
Post by LA Times on Aug 21, 2022 17:16:24 GMT -5
While Summerslam 1991 IMO was the end of the Hulkamania Era with the Ultimate Warrior getting fired and Hulk Hogan leaving to make movies, the New Generation Era didnt kick in until Bret Hart beat Ric Flair for the WWF Championship. In between was a transitional period.
|
|
|
Post by Mongo Bears on Aug 21, 2022 17:19:42 GMT -5
When Hogan left wwf, I left wwf. And thus began the New Generation for me.
|
|
|
Post by Nivro™ on Aug 22, 2022 0:21:45 GMT -5
The first RAW.
Too many Golden Era guys were still involved in 1992. Hogan, Flair, Savage, Warrior etc...It wasnt until the transition to RAW where we got a new format that displayed new champions in Bret & HBK and the little usage & even acknowledgement of Hogan, Flair, Warrior etc (Macho was still on commentary) that it felt like something "new" was upon us.
|
|
TheEvilDoink1987
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 22, 2010 21:37:52 GMT -5
Posts: 2,807
|
Post by TheEvilDoink1987 on Aug 23, 2022 13:35:50 GMT -5
I think I'd have to go with when Bret beat Flair for his first WWF World title. To me, Bret is and always has been the face of the New Generation era so him winning that first belt was the launching point. The only awkward part of that timeline is the brief period between WrestleMania IX and King of the Ring 1993 where Hogan was again on top, but even then he felt like someone from a bygone era who didn't fit in anymore. I couldn't agree more. It's the end that's much murkier to me. Great point. Takes a lot more thinking regarding the end of the New Generation. I might have to go with the Pillman gun segment or maybe when they debuted the Raw is War moniker with the new set at the beginning of 1997.
|
|
|
Post by JokerFC on Aug 23, 2022 19:33:50 GMT -5
For me it felt different from.the time Raw debuted...felt like a new company to me.
No Hogan, Warrior, Bulldog or LOD. Macho as a commentator...loads of new guys in and the jobber format mostly gone.
Really sunk in at RR94....Diesels big push at that event etc.
Ends for me with Brets heel turn at WM13.1997 was "wakey wakey Vince" year...very transitional like 1992 but in much different ways.
|
|
nibs92
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 29, 2008 5:47:21 GMT -5
Posts: 2,351
|
Post by nibs92 on Aug 24, 2022 16:45:17 GMT -5
For me it felt different from.the time Raw debuted...felt like a new company to me. No Hogan, Warrior, Bulldog or LOD. Macho as a commentator...loads of new guys in and the jobber format mostly gone. Really sunk in at RR94....Diesels big push at that event etc. Ends for me with Brets heel turn at WM13.1997 was "wakey wakey Vince" year...very transitional like 1992 but in much different ways. Yeah I totally get the “new company” feel. I was still watching when Raw began but took a while to get used to it. So glad I persevered though. A lot of interesting points of view in this thread though
|
|