Angusdacat
Superstar
Joined on: Jun 26, 2014 21:28:21 GMT -5
Posts: 702
|
Post by Angusdacat on Nov 1, 2024 22:19:51 GMT -5
I'd rather a little roster trimming and getting really specific on what makes their titles different from one another. Having 20 belts that someone can casually hop around and challenge for at any time makes all of the titles feel less important. Have one belt be a TV only championship. Have one belt entirely based around rankings, have one belt based on weight class, etc. Little things that give people some bit of reasoning on what title and division they are focusing on and why.
You don't need to separate rosters and drafts annually when you have distinct divisions that can have wrestlers naturally shifted through story and character.
|
|
switchbladeera
Superstar
Joined on: Oct 22, 2023 19:31:26 GMT -5
Posts: 654
|
Post by switchbladeera on Nov 1, 2024 22:35:30 GMT -5
I'd rather a little roster trimming and getting really specific on what makes their titles different from one another. Having 20 belts that someone can casually hop around and challenge for at any time makes all of the titles feel less important. Have one belt be a TV only championship. Have one belt entirely based around rankings, have one belt based on weight class, etc. Little things that give people some bit of reasoning on what title and division they are focusing on and why. You don't need to separate rosters and drafts annually when you have distinct divisions that can have wrestlers naturally shifted through story and character. . I like this a lot. Early aew was great for this when they only had 3 titles. Adding more isn't necessarily bad but the purposes need to be clear.
|
|