|
|
LOCK IT
Nov 24, 2007 18:31:36 GMT -5
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Nov 24, 2007 18:31:36 GMT -5
Winner faces Claudio in the semi finals.
|
|
|
|
LOCK IT
Nov 24, 2007 18:46:17 GMT -5
Post by CBT on Nov 24, 2007 18:46:17 GMT -5
I know Mike is the better of athlete. But Delirious is one hell of an entertainer. I'm just gonna go with him, while he's still got a support line.
|
|
|
|
LOCK IT
Nov 24, 2007 18:52:24 GMT -5
Post by zombiesx on Nov 24, 2007 18:52:24 GMT -5
Quackenbush for sure!
|
|
|
|
LOCK IT
Nov 24, 2007 19:22:45 GMT -5
Post by Juba on Nov 24, 2007 19:22:45 GMT -5
Quack without question
|
|
|
|
LOCK IT
Nov 24, 2007 19:33:19 GMT -5
Post by Flyrfn144 on Nov 24, 2007 19:33:19 GMT -5
Quack wins in better talent category, Del wins in better gimmick category. As much as a good gimmick is needed, I take talent any day, Quack is my vote.
|
|
|
|
LOCK IT
Nov 24, 2007 20:46:05 GMT -5
Post by jack on Nov 24, 2007 20:46:05 GMT -5
Quack
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 25, 2024 16:37:59 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
LOCK IT
Nov 24, 2007 22:15:06 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Nov 24, 2007 22:15:06 GMT -5
this one was really hard if i could i would vote for both but delirious is my favorite and has a good gimmick but the quack is still awesome
|
|
|
|
LOCK IT
Nov 24, 2007 22:56:06 GMT -5
Post by CBT on Nov 24, 2007 22:56:06 GMT -5
Yeah guys, let's be constructive.
See, this is why Larry Sweeney didn't beat Bryan Danielson, in this damn thing! Larry Sweeney is a god in the old school heel portion of entertainment. Sure Dragon is what we pay for, most of the time, but Sweeney can be just as on par on the mic as Dragon is in the ring.
So think out side the squared circle.
|
|
|
|
LOCK IT
Nov 24, 2007 23:38:48 GMT -5
Post by the franchise on Nov 24, 2007 23:38:48 GMT -5
I didn't know acting like a intellectually- disabled person was a gimmick. If you want to talk about overrated that conversation starts with Delirious.
|
|
|
|
LOCK IT
Nov 25, 2007 1:44:05 GMT -5
Post by CBT on Nov 25, 2007 1:44:05 GMT -5
I didn't know acting like a intellectually- disabled person was a gimmick. If you want to talk about overrated that conversation starts with Delirious. To each their own. |
|
Captain d00m - Mr. 3000
Main Eventer
Bringing death and destruction since 2005!
Joined on: Dec 2, 2005 20:52:43 GMT -5
Posts: 3,376
|
LOCK IT
Nov 25, 2007 2:53:25 GMT -5
Post by Captain d00m - Mr. 3000 on Nov 25, 2007 2:53:25 GMT -5
BAH BAH BAH BAH BAH BAH exjiIahrtir8dhr VOTEnjtues ahigFOR aslfhawihDELIRIOUS!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
LOCK IT
Nov 25, 2007 3:40:24 GMT -5
Post by HHH316 on Nov 25, 2007 3:40:24 GMT -5
I'm going with Delirious, based on I've just seen a ton more of his work. What I've seen from Quack is great, but still I cant give him my vote
|
|
|
|
LOCK IT
Nov 25, 2007 3:48:08 GMT -5
Post by spritezero on Nov 25, 2007 3:48:08 GMT -5
if quack doesnt win this round, or this entire tournament for that matter....then wf is ideologically insane.
|
|
Hazza
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 29, 2006 5:26:17 GMT -5
Posts: 1,010
|
LOCK IT
Nov 25, 2007 5:11:25 GMT -5
Post by Hazza on Nov 25, 2007 5:11:25 GMT -5
I voted Quack, just generally a much better wrestler overall.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 25, 2024 16:37:59 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
LOCK IT
Nov 25, 2007 12:23:42 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Nov 25, 2007 12:23:42 GMT -5
I like Delerious' gimmick and all, but Quack is the better wrestler by a huge margin.
My vote is for Quack.
|
|
|
|
LOCK IT
Nov 25, 2007 14:02:02 GMT -5
Post by perilloboy123 on Nov 25, 2007 14:02:02 GMT -5
Quackenbush, definately.
|
|
mike
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 8, 2006 0:33:35 GMT -5
Posts: 2,871
|
LOCK IT
Nov 25, 2007 14:40:51 GMT -5
Post by mike on Nov 25, 2007 14:40:51 GMT -5
Quack.
|
|
|
|
LOCK IT
Nov 25, 2007 15:17:59 GMT -5
Post by CBT on Nov 25, 2007 15:17:59 GMT -5
if quack doesnt win this round, or this entire tournament for that matter....then wf is ideologically insane. Of course though, Danielson will get the vote; Apathy will reign supreme. |
|
|
|
LOCK IT
Nov 26, 2007 20:24:31 GMT -5
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Nov 26, 2007 20:24:31 GMT -5
lock
|
|
