|
|
Post by pimpmaster5000 on Feb 5, 2008 18:29:24 GMT -5
only reason you want her slappy is because your gay ,and more like a woman . read my sig Are you even old enough to vote? next year i would of been my b-days in January I'm bummed but I'm still politically active ( i still support who i support and were shirts and all that good stuff) |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Feb 5, 2008 18:31:07 GMT -5
What has Hillary flip-flopped on? You make it seem as if she changes her position every week.
Out of the Republicans left, I'd rather have Romney win the Presidency.
Romney has flip-flopped on abortion, gay rights (Which he said he would be to the left of Ted Kennedy on), and health care.
|
|
|
|
Post by Quanthor on Feb 5, 2008 18:34:37 GMT -5
Exit poll Make the best Commander in Chief Hillary 50% Barack 35% I think 'who would be the best commander in chief' is an important question. Hillary beats Barack. I think it is important that we elect based on that. On MSNBC, they said "Close your eyes and imagine who you want in a national emergency." And I believe that would be Hillary. I would want her in a crisis. I'd want someone who is ready on day one. Haven't seen the Republican exit polls yet. In a national emergency, the last person I want is Hilary. First off.....during any type of emergency.....I am gonna want a Republican leader. Most Democrats are a lot of show and tell. They put on a good show, but dont back anything up. I'm not trying to run one political party down. So I definitely do not want to get into a debate over it. I am simply stating my opinion and the reason why. If I had to choose a Democrat, I would have taken John Edwards. Unfortunately, I think most Democrats find him to be too bi partisan and thats why he is out. I agree that McCain is very much like Bush. I supported Bush, but there are a few things that I dont particularly care for with McCain. McCain has too much of an old school of thinking. Romney has the most in common with my political views. Though at the beginning of this thing, I was with Giuliani. But with his family history and the Republican "moral value compass" he is out. Please dont get me wrong, as I may be a Republican, its only cuz I agree with more of their stances than Democrats. Though I find both parties to be flawed and it really comes down to choosing between two very different evils. And speaking of evil, Hilary Clinton about epitomizes that evil. Not only does she make for a piss poor leader, but she can never pick a point of view. She flip flops more than well...flip flops. Yeah because FDR and Truman did such a horrible job fighting WWII and Eisnenhower, Nixon annd Bush I and II have done an outstanding job with fighting their wars  |
|
|
|
Post by bjd on Feb 5, 2008 18:35:59 GMT -5
I voted for McCain in hopes that he chooses Rambo as his vice President, and drops dead after one day in office.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Feb 5, 2008 18:38:20 GMT -5
Georgia closes in about 20 minutes.
I expect an Obama blow out.
|
|
|
|
Post by boskstein on Feb 5, 2008 18:54:30 GMT -5
I vote obama and Huckobee.
If I could vote
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Feb 5, 2008 18:56:13 GMT -5
Georgia polls are closed.
|
|
|
|
Post by pimpmaster5000 on Feb 5, 2008 18:58:18 GMT -5
I vote obama and Huckobee. If I could vote that would make no sense  you can only .............oh i get it  |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Feb 5, 2008 18:59:49 GMT -5
Obama won Georgia.
According to all news channels.
No idea of the percentages.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Feb 5, 2008 19:19:39 GMT -5
Montana 5% reporting
Romney - 36%
McCain - 30%
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Feb 5, 2008 19:22:07 GMT -5
Georgia 0% reporting
McCain - 38%
Huckabee - 28%
Romney - 27%
|
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Feb 5, 2008 19:49:20 GMT -5
In a national emergency, the last person I want is Hilary. First off.....during any type of emergency.....I am gonna want a Republican leader. Most Democrats are a lot of show and tell. They put on a good show, but dont back anything up. I'm not trying to run one political party down. So I definitely do not want to get into a debate over it. I am simply stating my opinion and the reason why. If I had to choose a Democrat, I would have taken John Edwards. Unfortunately, I think most Democrats find him to be too bi partisan and thats why he is out. I agree that McCain is very much like Bush. I supported Bush, but there are a few things that I dont particularly care for with McCain. McCain has too much of an old school of thinking. Romney has the most in common with my political views. Though at the beginning of this thing, I was with Giuliani. But with his family history and the Republican "moral value compass" he is out. Please dont get me wrong, as I may be a Republican, its only cuz I agree with more of their stances than Democrats. Though I find both parties to be flawed and it really comes down to choosing between two very different evils. And speaking of evil, Hilary Clinton about epitomizes that evil. Not only does she make for a piss poor leader, but she can never pick a point of view. She flip flops more than well...flip flops. Yeah because FDR and Truman did such a horrible job fighting WWII and Eisnenhower, Nixon annd Bush I and II have done an outstanding job with fighting their wars First off.....WWII was a damn disaster. It took Pearl Harbor before we finally accepted the fact that Hitler was a world threat and not just a European one. So yes, they did do a piss poor job of it. Nixon was only cleaning up Kennedy's mess. However, I will say that Nixon didnt do that best of a job with it. Dont get me started on George Bush. I HAVE TO AGREE WITH YOU on him. He liked to get things started, but never wanted to finish it out. But I dont take as much issue with George W. He did what he thought was right with the Iraq situation. Is the world safer with Saddam out of it? I think so. So in that regard, I have no issue with it. |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Feb 5, 2008 19:57:07 GMT -5
McCain wins Jersey, Illinois, Conn.
Huckabee wins Alabama.
Romney wins Mass.
Obama wins Illinois.
Hillary wins Oklahoma.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Feb 5, 2008 20:02:36 GMT -5
Obama leads 93-48 on Clinton?! Wow! I thought it would be much closer than that. 2025 is the magic number, right?
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Ralphio on Feb 5, 2008 20:04:59 GMT -5
Shit, I wanted Romney to lose Mass, so he would totally be done for.
Looks like McCain is taking it to him anyways
|
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Feb 5, 2008 20:06:08 GMT -5
****, I wanted Romney to lose Mass, so he would totally be done for. Looks like McCain is taking it to him anyways Its still close. |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Feb 5, 2008 20:07:23 GMT -5
Obama leads 93-48 on Clinton?! Wow! I thought it would be much closer than that. 2025 is the magic number, right? Not yet. Delegates are unknown. |
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Feb 5, 2008 20:07:55 GMT -5
Obama leads 93-48 on Clinton?! Wow! I thought it would be much closer than that. 2025 is the magic number, right? Not yet. Delegates are unknown. MSN reports 2025 is the magic number |
|
Strike
Main Eventer
WF SFBL: 14-2
Joined on: Jul 26, 2005 0:01:35 GMT -5
Posts: 1,685
|
Post by Strike on Feb 5, 2008 20:10:15 GMT -5
Romney takes all.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Feb 5, 2008 20:11:59 GMT -5
Not yet. Delegates are unknown. MSN reports 2025 is the magic number I meant your 94-48. |
|
