|
|
Post by Guy Incognito on Oct 5, 2008 1:16:19 GMT -5
Really? If it's in I've yet to find it.  It's a reversal on the ground, all the highflyers do it, they go to your head, you reverse you kip up back into a headscissor and fling em over. Too bad it's not the Hurricanrana. |
|
|
|
Post by OverTheEdge on Oct 5, 2008 6:33:24 GMT -5
Atleast the Smackdown series doesn't get completely boring after a week of the same moves over and over. I still play SVR08 and haven't played Impact since the first week of buying it. Face it, it was a good attempt at giving us something new but they failed. It's not a wrestling game, it's more like a street fighting game. You have to beat somebody with every chair on ringside when you go for the world title, not to mention hit them with two finishers. Yet.. I'm still playing it and I haven't played SVR 2008 in months.  Well, obviously it comes down to a matter of opinions. Obviously you're a huge TNA fan, so I'd imagine you'd be more inclined to play that game over the SmackDown! ones, even if it's not as good. The thing about the two games is that each has what the other doesn't. SmackDown! has all of these awesome features and a lot to do in the game, while iMPACT! is just overall fun, which sometimes the SmackDown! games just aren't. But with each of those positives comes their negatives which equal out in the SmackDown! games, but tend to weigh a bit more heavily in iMPACT! because of the overall lack of things to do. Sure matches are fun, but the lack of moves make it seem like the same match over and over. |
|
|
|
Post by The Mac on Oct 5, 2008 10:52:19 GMT -5
Has the TNA Wii version got any diffrence to the ps2 version?
plus dunno if posted but in the Daily ECHO newspaper in the uk it says the TNA Game was 4 stars
|
|
|
|
Post by laythvandam on Oct 5, 2008 18:12:53 GMT -5
Has the TNA Wii version got any diffrence to the ps2 version? plus dunno if posted but in the Daily ECHO newspaper in the uk it says the TNA Game was 4 stars iMPACT! for the Wii in the UK ain't out yet. |
|
|
|
Post by The Mac on Oct 6, 2008 3:16:47 GMT -5
Has the TNA Wii version got any diffrence to the ps2 version? plus dunno if posted but in the Daily ECHO newspaper in the uk it says the TNA Game was 4 stars iMPACT! for the Wii in the UK ain't out yet. Yes it is, I saw it in Game  |
|
Bozwell634™
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 27, 2007 0:11:21 GMT -5
Posts: 4,652
|
Post by Bozwell634™ on Oct 7, 2008 4:57:51 GMT -5
I just finished the game the other day i really enjoyed it!
Was fun
|
|
|
|
Post by Graze on Oct 8, 2008 8:53:56 GMT -5
I thought it was a boring game to play, well in Story Mode anyways. I rented it and didn't like it. It felt like I never really had control over my wrestler, like I had no idea what direction to grapple in to pull off certain moves.
|
|
|
|
Post by bigshow on Oct 8, 2008 9:43:29 GMT -5
Great Game but needs loads of work for the next game
|
|
|
|
Post by Jord on Oct 8, 2008 10:02:17 GMT -5
The gameplay on TNA owns the SmackDown! series. Explain. I prefer the SmackDown! games because they have so much more match types and things to do than TNA, but the gameplay on TNA is so much more fun than SmackDown! is. |
|
|
|
Post by Yeezy's Mullet: Team X Blades on Oct 8, 2008 15:35:18 GMT -5
I prefer the SmackDown! games because they have so much more match types and things to do than TNA, but the gameplay on TNA is so much more fun than SmackDown! is. The gameplay is fun and all but, (and it's taken me from the release dat up until now for me to come this) I actually prefer SVR over TNA. TNA really just feels like a fighting game. After over 15 years of playing wrestling games Iv'e come to long for the ability to have a realistic wrestling match and TNA just doesn't provide that. Especially when JJ can squash you in about a legit 30 seconds. There is no way to carry out a realistic match in iMPACT!. I mean from start to finish you're just running around doing kick and punches an running attacks. You become so focused on wheather you're going to counter the next move or no that there's no time to even think about being in control. For me, even while playing with Herandez or Abyss, being in an endless mode of defense ruins the "fun" that everyone says this game produces. |
|
|
|
Post by Edgeman05 on Oct 8, 2008 22:32:37 GMT -5
Im still playing this!
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Oct 9, 2008 2:26:05 GMT -5
I'm still playing it aswell.
|
|
|
|
Post by Edgeman05 on Oct 9, 2008 7:44:44 GMT -5
Still dont got Afro Thunder |
|
Max
Main Eventer
"This is your life"
Joined on: Mar 22, 2008 12:06:28 GMT -5
Posts: 1,713
|
Post by Max on Oct 9, 2008 7:56:51 GMT -5
Still dont got Afro Thunder At least you're not stuck on Team 3D  |
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hammers on Oct 9, 2008 8:05:02 GMT -5
I still play the game to be honest, the game play is fun, it just bugs me everyone is the same size, I mean, nearly everyone is like 5'11/6'0, but then there is Abyss and Kevin Nash, Abyss would be more fun to play as if he had some sort of advantage over the other charicters in the game.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yeezy's Mullet: Team X Blades on Oct 9, 2008 9:20:00 GMT -5
Two months and still no DLC? Unacceptable. |
|
|
|
Post by Graze on Oct 9, 2008 12:01:36 GMT -5
Still dont got Afro Thunder At least you're not stuck on Team 3D the pc isn't hard to beat. Just keep arm dragging them and once in a while do a rebound move off the ropes. |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Oct 9, 2008 12:13:47 GMT -5
Two months and still no DLC? Unacceptable. Two months? Try a month. It came out in September. |
|
|
|
Post by Yeezy's Mullet: Team X Blades on Oct 9, 2008 12:28:22 GMT -5
Two months and still no DLC? Unacceptable. Two months? Try a month. It came out in September. OOPS!!! my bad, was thinkin Aug. But you can't honestly say that even 1 month is too long, considering the very low replayability of this game. |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Oct 9, 2008 12:31:01 GMT -5
I don't mind waiting tbh. I think holding it off 'till Novemember's smart than just throwing it out.
|
|
