|
Post by waylon on Jul 24, 2007 18:42:40 GMT -5
Stop being cheap and just get a next gen console already, PS2 has been out since what 2001? its 2007... A ING MEN!
|
|
|
Post by OverTheEdge on Jul 24, 2007 18:49:49 GMT -5
Stop being cheap and just get a next gen console already, PS2 has been out since what 2001? its 2007... A ING MEN! Exactly. The 360's been out for almost, if not, two years by now. If you want one, but don't have the money, then apparently you don't want one that badly. Anyone who can't raise that kind of money of two years needs a better job or needs to learn how to save their money.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 13, 2024 1:51:58 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2007 19:12:02 GMT -5
I wanted a 360 last year for 2007 and Saints Row, I didn't have a job then but never complained. I just sold my wrestling figures that just sat there collecting dust and made enough for a 360.
|
|
|
Post by Graze on Jul 24, 2007 19:12:15 GMT -5
A ING MEN! Exactly. The 360's been out for almost, if not, two years by now. If you want one, but don't have the money, then apparently you don't want one that badly. Anyone who can't raise that kind of money of two years needs a better job or needs to learn how to save their money. Seriously. I saved up for a couple of months to get my PS3 and it's the most expensive system on the market. It's not hard. Just learn how to manage your money.
|
|
|
Post by chumped on Jul 24, 2007 19:48:26 GMT -5
Ok, this sounds dumb, but what is a downloadable superstar? Meaning they put it on the marketplace so you can download it onto your game. And, for the person that said they hope its on PS2, no offense, but stop being so cheap and buy a 360 or PS3. You cant honestly expect them to add even half the features into a last gen game as they would a current gen game.
|
|
|
Post by stevecorinoisgod on Jul 24, 2007 19:49:08 GMT -5
how could they do it on last gen systems? It's 360 and PS3 only for DLC. Glad I upgraded now ;D But I fear that a) it will be CAW's or B) they'll charge for these[/b] Why wouldn't they? It'd be smart for them to do it. And am I the only person who thinks they're going to release them in like packs of 5?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 13, 2024 1:51:58 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2007 19:57:17 GMT -5
What would suck in a 5 pack is something like having to download 4 useless wrestlers to get 1 good one.
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Jul 24, 2007 20:02:57 GMT -5
What would suck in a 5 pack is something like having to download 4 useless wrestlers to get 1 good one. Superstar Pack #1: Chuck Palumbo, Hardcore Holly, Nunzio, Cody Rhodes and CM Punk
|
|
|
Post by the nexus on Jul 24, 2007 20:38:42 GMT -5
how is it a shame on me for not having a ps3? I don't have 500 bucks to spend on a game system right now so my ps2 is fine. I have car payments an other crap to worry about.
|
|
`Orton
Superstar
Joined on: Feb 20, 2004 11:20:07 GMT -5
Posts: 813
|
Post by `Orton on Jul 24, 2007 20:39:52 GMT -5
The problem with that is.... It only says PS3! I am not so willing to get a PS3 right now. I will rather have the X-Box 360! It's from a ing Playstation magazine, do you really think they're gonna confirm downloadable wrestlers on an XBOX game? easy there guy!
|
|
|
Post by waylon on Jul 24, 2007 20:43:28 GMT -5
how is it a shame on me for not having a ps3? I don't have 500 bucks to spend on a game system right now so my ps2 is fine. I have car payments an other **** to worry about. Well, you could get a 360 for $300. Just don't complain when PS2 games aren't getting the full treatment the next gen consoles are. The damn thing has been out for like seven years.
|
|
|
Post by Graze on Jul 24, 2007 20:50:46 GMT -5
how could they do it on last gen systems? It's 360 and PS3 only for DLC. Glad I upgraded now ;D But I fear that a) it will be CAW's or B) they'll charge for these[/b] Why wouldn't they? It'd be smart for them to do it. And am I the only person who thinks they're going to release them in like packs of 5?[/quote] You've spend $70 on a game, anything afterwards so should be free
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Jul 24, 2007 20:53:17 GMT -5
I wonder why they would do this. With this feature, they lose money because they will not need to make another SD game. Just keep updating everything through the marketplace. Im glad, though. The NHL games don't lose money and they always release roster updates until the next game comes out... same with the Madden games... and yet the Madden franchise is one of the biggest Game franchises and is still making money...
|
|
|
Post by stevecorinoisgod on Jul 24, 2007 20:54:29 GMT -5
[/b] Why wouldn't they? It'd be smart for them to do it. And am I the only person who thinks they're going to release them in like packs of 5?[/quote] You've spend $70 on a game, anything afterwards so should be free[/quote] $60, and if they're giving us stuff that DIDN'T make the cut and we'd likely have to wait a year for, we should have to pay
|
|
|
Post by dr percival cox on Jul 24, 2007 20:57:58 GMT -5
What would suck in a 5 pack is something like having to download 4 useless wrestlers to get 1 good one. Superstar Pack #1: Chuck Palumbo, Hardcore Holly, Nunzio, Cody Rhodes and CM Punk Except, CM Punk will be in for sure.
|
|
|
Post by Graze on Jul 24, 2007 21:03:16 GMT -5
You've spend $70 on a game, anything afterwards so should be free $60, and if they're giving us stuff that DIDN'T make the cut and we'd likely have to wait a year for, we should have to pay No we shouldn't. On the PC, they add more stuff all the time, and it's for free. I don't mind if they charge for it and then a few months later it's free, thats fine. I just don't believe that I should pay extra for things that probably should of been in the game in the first place.
|
|
|
Post by James Hetfield on Jul 24, 2007 21:13:53 GMT -5
I think it means like updates to the rosters and things. I wouldn't mind if they charge, it's no big deal. Pretty good idea if you ask me.
|
|
|
Post by Lk™ on Jul 24, 2007 21:24:08 GMT -5
Exactly. The 360's been out for almost, if not, two years by now. If you want one, but don't have the money, then apparently you don't want one that badly. Anyone who can't raise that kind of money of two years needs a better job or needs to learn how to save their money. Seriously. I saved up for a couple of months to get my PS3 and it's the most expensive system on the market. It's not hard. Just learn how to manage your money. Seriously. some people need to just get jobs. i had my 360 paid for in only 2 weeks.
|
|
|
Post by waylon on Jul 24, 2007 21:25:55 GMT -5
As long as they don't totally rape us (as in GH extra tracks bad), I'm fine with paying.
|
|
|
Post by amxfiles on Jul 24, 2007 21:26:38 GMT -5
$60, and if they're giving us stuff that DIDN'T make the cut and we'd likely have to wait a year for, we should have to pay No we shouldn't. On the PC, they add more stuff all the time, and it's for free. I don't mind if they charge for it and then a few months later it's free, thats fine. I just don't believe that I should pay extra for things that probably should of been in the game in the first place. For the home console market, Bethesda and EA set the standard, and made money off of it. Activision charges 500 points for 3 songs that were in the original Guitar Hero, and people buy them by the thousands. Companies saw that they can get away with it, and they are going to ing do it.
|
|