|
|
Post by alessicustoms2 on Sept 21, 2007 18:38:19 GMT -5
Impact last night did a 1.1 cable rating.
TNA: Impact (P) – 9P
HH: 1.08
M18-49: .81
M18-34: .76
P2+: 1.5 million viewers
TUF 6 – 10P
HH: .64
M18-49: .60
M18-34: .58
P2+: 760,000 viewers
UFC 76 Countdown – 11P
HH: .50
M18-49: .56
M18-34: .71
Credit to Gerweck.net
|
|
|
|
Post by sincityhero on Sept 21, 2007 18:43:24 GMT -5
Whatever all of that stuff meens.... good news anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ian from 616Entertainment. on Sept 21, 2007 20:01:00 GMT -5
Whatever all of that stuff meens.... good news anyway. Those are different age groups, pin pointing target audiences. M18-49 = Males, ages 18- 49. |
|
NotoriusVIG
Superstar
Joined on: Mar 4, 2004 10:38:57 GMT -5
Posts: 954
|
Post by NotoriusVIG on Sept 21, 2007 22:26:25 GMT -5
Well' we've established that TNA can consistently get 1.1's. Now, all they need to do is actually sell PPVs and they'd be able to say something good about themselves.
|
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Sept 22, 2007 16:11:05 GMT -5
Well' we've established that TNA can consistently get 1.1's. Now, all they need to do is actually sell PPVs and they'd be able to say something good about themselves. I always thought it was the other way around. Success on PPV, more good stuff than bad, with alot to complain about. But TNA Impact being what needs to be worked on, as nobody they sign will change the ratings. Or for that matter, what's booked. |
|
StingerSplash™
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 23, 2006 14:33:54 GMT -5
Posts: 1,429
|
Post by StingerSplash™ on Sept 23, 2007 1:07:17 GMT -5
i dont understand what a 1.1 is? is it good?
|
|
