Triple A
Superstar
Joined on: Oct 20, 2006 15:22:34 GMT -5
Posts: 560
|
Post by Triple A on Sept 30, 2007 1:41:58 GMT -5
To tell you the truth, I really don't watch a lot of TNA. I only watch TNA when there's absolutely nothing on TV. I have to admit it's a great show with some great talent, but I'm really not committed into watching it every week. I do watch RAW every week and I try not to miss ECW (I don't even bother with Smackdown! anymore.).
Well over the past few weeks, there has been a lot of hype over the new Women's division in TNA. I'm a big fan of WWE Women's wrestling, but lately the WWE Women's division has been really lagging. Candice as Women’s champ is really starting to take away from the other talented divas like Mickie James, Melina, and Jillian Hall. When was the last time we saw Mickie in a match on RAW (besides teaming w/Candice)? I’m not saying that Candice is a horrible Women’s champ; it’s just that we’re not seeing enough good matches. Beth has been getting a lot of airtime trying to build a bigger feud with Candice, but haven’t we seen enough of the underdog story (cough, cough… CENA)?
I happened to watch TNA the other day and they showed a 5-way match between the women of TNA (Knockouts). The winner enters last into the gauntlet at BFG to become the new TNA Women’s champ. I have to admit it was a good match, where Gail Kim was the obvious stand out. After watching the match I was surprised to say that TNA currently has the better women’s division. I know it was only one match, but just look at the talent that TNA has: Gail Kim, Jackie Moore, Ms. Brooks and I heard Amazing Kong, Shelly Martinez just to name a few.
Now that TNA will be debuting their 2-hour show, the Women’s division will now have a bigger part on Impact. I just wanted to get some opinions over the whole thing. Just a side note, I’m guessing the last 2 will be Gail and Kong and Gail taking the belt in the end.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ian from 616Entertainment. on Sept 30, 2007 2:01:50 GMT -5
I just saw Amazing Kong at the ROH PPV here in Chicago. She's not the best looking woman in the world (shocker!) but she's a damn fine entertainer.
TNA needs Sara Del Rey.
|
|
eso
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 22, 2007 4:44:58 GMT -5
Posts: 1,175
|
Post by eso on Sept 30, 2007 2:15:11 GMT -5
yeah that womens match on impact was badass
im excited for this division.. i just hope they at least have more than 6 girls in the division.. id like to see a division with like 10 chicks
|
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Sept 30, 2007 2:38:33 GMT -5
Haven't seen shimmer out side of vol 1 and matches at ROH events. Yet to see Kong. But ROH has made a wise approach to the women they've so far considered. 3/5 I'm grateful, 1 I need to figure out and 1 I'm overhyped on.
But they've sure got 10 solid women to work with. I think though like on Thursday's impact. Gail Kim is the best suited for the first champion, sure she makes for a great challenger, but she's so fluid. She moves with grace and she's far from hard to look at. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Eyce on Sept 30, 2007 4:59:25 GMT -5
I just saw Amazing Kong at the ROH PPV here in Chicago. She's not the best looking woman in the world (shocker!) but she's a damn fine entertainer. TNA needs Sara Del Rey. She better stay away from there... <_< |
|
UFW.222
Main Eventer
12 refs and counting!!!
Joined on: May 15, 2007 10:04:24 GMT -5
Posts: 1,519
|
Post by UFW.222 on Sept 30, 2007 12:51:47 GMT -5
wwe divas are not as good as tna divas
|
|
Adam3s - V1
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 12, 2006 8:41:51 GMT -5
Posts: 1,794
|
Post by Adam3s - V1 on Sept 30, 2007 13:28:43 GMT -5
WWE's still has more talent with the likes of Jillian, Beth, Victoria, Mickie, Melina and even Kristal, Michelle McCool and Candice can look good when being carried. Also they have plenty of talent in OVW and FCW.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 24, 2024 14:06:45 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2007 16:30:48 GMT -5
I'm am going to laugh when this goes down the drain like WCW's women's division.
|
|
|
|
Post by JTG on Sept 30, 2007 18:11:05 GMT -5
Yeah, that match was definatly rockin' the shit.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Sept 30, 2007 21:21:39 GMT -5
Sorry, but WWE's women's division holds one distinct advantage: their division won't be cut in half after one match.
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Sept 30, 2007 21:50:50 GMT -5
Sorry, but WWE's women's division holds one distinct advantage: their division won't be cut in half after one match. RAW Divas That Wrestle- Beth - Jillian - Melina - Maria - Mickie James Smackdown Divas That Wrestle - Michelle McCool - Torrie - Victoria The only reason WWE has a bigger division is the fact they have 3 shows (which only two of their shows have women wrestling) & only one of their shows has a title they can compete for. TNA Divas That Wrestle The Amazing Kong - Has signed a contract Christy Hemme Gail Kim Jackie Moore Ms.Brooks Roxy Laveaux 8 WWE Divas that wrestle & 6 TNA Knockouts that wrestle (after Kong debuts). I don't see what the diffrence is besides two. If any of the 5 they are bringing in impress them (one of those 5 already must have since Kong is signed) they'll sign them to a contract. I don't see what the diffrence is really. It won't be cut in half after Bound For Glory seeing how only 6 of those in the match are signed to contracts the other 4 are only there for "fillers".  |
|
|
|
Post by the franchise on Sept 30, 2007 22:26:32 GMT -5
I don't think many people will tune in to see Kong.
|
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Oct 1, 2007 14:15:02 GMT -5
this help?
|
|
|
|
Post by onemoretime on Oct 1, 2007 21:29:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by mrchase on Oct 2, 2007 2:38:38 GMT -5
wwe divas are not as good as tna divas please!, you all got to be kidding because TNA knockout are not better then WWe divas . I have seen better womens wrestling matches from WWE in the last few month then TNA has ever had . sorry,but WWE divas seem to wrestle better matches then TNA knockout who don't seem to put a good wrestling match for crap. i went to smackdown/ecw house in Columbia ,mo & i saw Michelle McCool vs Victoria. that match was better then any womens match TNA has ever had & that is sad .TNA will never do a womens match right as long as vince russo & jeff jarret are around . vince russo does not know anything about a good women's wrestling match . also WWe has krissy vaine & nattie neidhart coming to smackdown . WWe will always do women wrestling better then TNA . shoot i see matches between Melina & candice Michelle that are better then any tna womens match ever & i have seen all of tna since the first show in 2002.so that says alot about TNA womens wrestling they are not fluided as WWes womens wrestlers & that is fact . |
|
|
|
Post by greenjack1992 on Oct 2, 2007 9:19:20 GMT -5
wwe divas are not as good as tna divas Correct, TNA utilize their female wrestlers much more effectively, Gail Kim and Jackie Moore used to have fantastic matches. It seems to me that WWE has no time for the Women of today anymore, they'd rather just present them as 'the sexiest women on television' which, to bo honest, is a joke because Melina Perez, Jillian hall, Mickie James and others are very talented in ring performers. |
|
|
|
Post by mrchase on Oct 2, 2007 10:10:42 GMT -5
wwe divas are not as good as tna divas Correct, TNA utilize their female wrestlers much more effectively, Gail Kim and Jackie Moore used to have fantastic matches. It seems to me that WWE has no time for the Women of today anymore, they'd rather just present them as 'the sexiest women on television' which, to bo honest, is a joke because Melina Perez, Jillian hall, Mickie James and others are very talented in ring performers. that is bullcrap you are saying . tna does not utilize their females better WWe . please TNA has barley used them at all compared to wwe. wwe divas at least wrestle every week & put on better matches then any tna knockout has had in tna . pleae vince russo knows nothing about womens wrestling instead he will kill it & treat it wrong like he did in wcw.W We divas are more fluided at wrestling then tna knockouts & show more in ring then tna knockouts. so stop being a blind mark because WWE divas are still the best women wrestlers out their compared to tna knockouts who barley wrestle & show hardley any wrestling skill compared to WWE divas.i am fan of tna but they never done women wrestling from the start & never will compared to WWE. |
|
G A G A
Main Eventer
12 Refs!!
Joined on: May 30, 2007 13:41:11 GMT -5
Posts: 1,592
|
Post by G A G A on Oct 2, 2007 10:22:12 GMT -5
I think the TNA divas show a lot of potential and have a very credile strong roster but prefer the WWE divas as i love them more and think they have more character and actual storylines.
|
|
|
|
Post by onemoretime on Oct 2, 2007 11:24:45 GMT -5
Correct, TNA utilize their female wrestlers much more effectively, Gail Kim and Jackie Moore used to have fantastic matches. It seems to me that WWE has no time for the Women of today anymore, they'd rather just present them as 'the sexiest women on television' which, to bo honest, is a joke because Melina Perez, Jillian hall, Mickie James and others are very talented in ring performers. that is bullcrap you are saying . tna does not utilize their females better WWe . please TNA has barley used them at all compared to wwe. wwe divas at least wrestle every week & put on better matches then any tna knockout has had in tna . pleae vince russo knows nothing about womens wrestling instead he will kill it & treat it wrong like he did in wcw.W We divas are more fluided at wrestling then tna knockouts & show more in ring then tna knockouts. so stop being a blind mark because WWE divas are still the best women wrestlers out their compared to tna knockouts who barley wrestle & show hardley any wrestling skill compared to WWE divas.i am fan of tna but they never done women wrestling from the start & never will compared to WWE. What show have you been watching? WWE's women's wrestling (like all WWE wrestling, and I'm not being a mark, I'm simply telling the truth) has been horrible for years |
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Oct 2, 2007 11:30:53 GMT -5
Sorry, but WWE's women's division holds one distinct advantage: their division won't be cut in half after one match. RAW Divas That Wrestle- Beth - Jillian - Melina - Maria - Mickie James Smackdown Divas That Wrestle - Michelle McCool - Torrie - Victoria The only reason WWE has a bigger division is the fact they have 3 shows (which only two of their shows have women wrestling) & only one of their shows has a title they can compete for. TNA Divas That Wrestle The Amazing Kong - Has signed a contract Christy Hemme Gail Kim Jackie Moore Ms.Brooks Roxy Laveaux 8 WWE Divas that wrestle & 6 TNA Knockouts that wrestle (after Kong debuts). I don't see what the diffrence is besides two. If any of the 5 they are bringing in impress them (one of those 5 already must have since Kong is signed) they'll sign them to a contract. I don't see what the diffrence is really. It won't be cut in half after Bound For Glory seeing how only 6 of those in the match are signed to contracts the other 4 are only there for "fillers". OK, then let me amend my previous statement: The division will be cut by 40% after one match. |
|
