|
|
Post by dayumm on Oct 14, 2007 15:10:55 GMT -5
hi, i just picked up the wm 23 lashley and umaga
my local tru surprisingly had them which saved me driving an extra 30 mins to the next one, to see if they even had it
ive been buying ra's since RA 1 and have kept up to date and i have to say this is one of the most satisfying packs ive ever purchased
previously i had the adrenaline lashley (forget which series) and the debut umaga from the estrada and umaga adrenaline pack
these are light years ahead
first of all-
umaga has every thing awesome down to the last detail, many would complain about the missing back tat, but i dont really care
from a frontal view umaga is stunning with all his tats and correct facepaint, tights etc
the beads around his neck are painted
PLUS: the dreads are down instead of going every whichway direction like his adrenaline fig
comes with ic title, another plus
lashley is awesome as well, has his ripped torso, plus an ecw title which is painted! (minus the blue of course)
has his shoulder tat and new tights, awesome fig to have when he comes back
these are great and without a doubt the best figs of these two to date, plus it comes with two belts! great set, couldnt be better imo
10/10 and kudos to jakks
|
|
|
|
Post by kanekilledvince on Oct 14, 2007 15:13:21 GMT -5
to be fair, that was more of a brief description than a review  |
|
|
|
Post by dayumm on Oct 14, 2007 15:21:20 GMT -5
to be fair, that was more of a brief description than a review k douche |
|
|
|
Post by JCF on Oct 14, 2007 15:26:08 GMT -5
Defenitley an awesome set. One of the few Jakks sets that has no flaws at all. I was lucky enough to find it a few days ago, And i love this set. Enjoy
|
|
|
|
Post by Edge618 on Oct 14, 2007 15:32:59 GMT -5
I dont see how you can point out that Umaga doesnt have his back tat, and the ECW Belt isnt painted and still give them a 10/10. 10/10 is a perfect score, so everything would be 100% correct right? Well its not so its more like an 8/10
|
|
|
|
Post by kanekilledvince on Oct 14, 2007 15:45:07 GMT -5
to be fair, that was more of a brief description than a review k douche Well OK, I'd say it is a review when you post the pictures that show exactly what you are talking about. When you cover things in great detail. When you tell me what the flaws are about the figures. Should I forgive the lack of a back design? Why is it a 10 out of 10? Are the right body parts used? Which face paint does Umaga have? Does anyone have their own specific-made body moulds? do they look very generic? should I only pick them up if I am a huge fan of them? Is it worth buying them if i already have them? Are they worth the price tag? should i wait to see if i can get them at a reduced price? Is the IC belt painted? Should I hang out until the Umaga/Jeff pack is released? Do you imagine they will have better figures shortly down the road? Will i have a pain in my ass looking for these or will they be everywhere i go? Are they rare? I expected to read a review, not "OMG buy Da Figs day rawk!!". You're too biased in your approach to reviewing them. Also, you acknowledge flaws, but still choose to rate them at 10/10... How? |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 28, 2024 11:53:06 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 14, 2007 16:31:19 GMT -5
to be fair, that was more of a brief description than a review k douche Somebody can't handle constructive criticism. |
|
|
|
Post by naparo01 on Oct 14, 2007 16:52:57 GMT -5
to be fair, that was more of a brief description than a review . He has a point man. |
|
|
|
Post by knightpryde on Oct 14, 2007 18:34:53 GMT -5
I dont see how you can point out that Umaga doesnt have his back tat, and the ECW Belt isnt painted and still give them a 10/10. 10/10 is a perfect score, so everything would be 100% correct right? Well its not so its more like an 8/10 who the hell cares if you got nothing to contribute to the thread. don't post. Umaga has only had his back tats for a little more than a month, which is only a a few weeks before the figure was released in TRU. Its not Jakks fault that Umaga has to get new tatoo every month and they can;t keep up. If the Umaga was released two weeks earlier it would of been dead on accurate with a 10/10. and what Jakks figure comes with a painted belt. NONE, except for IE RVD. So since the Belts are NEVER painted is see no reason to take point off for the ECW belt missing the blue. It already is way ahead of most figure sets. your just starting a flame war for no reason |
|
ra24sabu
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
BRING THIS BACK!!!!
Joined on: Aug 29, 2007 22:31:11 GMT -5
Posts: 2,086 
|
Post by ra24sabu on Oct 14, 2007 18:43:48 GMT -5
Well OK, I'd say it is a review when you post the pictures that show exactly what you are talking about. When you cover things in great detail. When you tell me what the flaws are about the figures. Should I forgive the lack of a back design? Why is it a 10 out of 10? Are the right body parts used? Which face paint does Umaga have? Does anyone have their own specific-made body moulds? do they look very generic? should I only pick them up if I am a huge fan of them? Is it worth buying them if i already have them? Are they worth the price tag? should i wait to see if i can get them at a reduced price? Is the IC belt painted? Should I hang out until the Umaga/Jeff pack is released? Do you imagine they will have better figures shortly down the road? Will i have a pain in my ass looking for these or will they be everywhere i go? Are they rare? I expected to read a review, not "OMG buy Da Figs day rawk!!". You're too biased in your approach to reviewing them. Also, you acknowledge flaws, but still choose to rate them at 10/10... How?
OWNED!!! |
|
|
|
Post by the nexus on Oct 14, 2007 18:52:42 GMT -5
to be fair it is based on wrestlemania and Umaga didn't have the back tat yet.
|
|
|
|
Post by LLD on Oct 14, 2007 19:10:08 GMT -5
would have been better had you posted pics so everyone who doesn't have that wm23 2-pack would know exactly what you're talking about.
|
|
