|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Oct 5, 2007 18:02:17 GMT -5
Yes that was a shot at Instant Classic's ECW post. Dave Meltzer reported that TNA's first two hour show got a 1.1....surprised?
I'm not. I think it's funny TNA tried to make it seem like it was going to be a huge deal and it basically was two Impact, in terms of ratings. I liked Impact last night but, really TNA shouldn't have acted like they had an ace in the hole. I think this is obvious but for a two hour show, that's shitty.
|
|
|
|
Post by thegalaxy on Oct 5, 2007 19:14:33 GMT -5
Yes that was a shot at Instant Classic's ECW post. Dave Meltzer reported that TNA's first two hour show got a 1.1....surprised? I'm not. I think it's funny TNA tried to make it seem like it was going to be a huge deal and it basically was two Impact, in terms of ratings. I liked Impact last night but, really TNA shouldn't have acted like they had an ace in the hole. I think this is obvious but for a two hour show, that's ****ty. As soon as I read it I knew you were taking a shot at me  I was honestly surprised that they did this well. The show wasn't that good and I figure with stuff like Rhino-Reign, people would tune out. I know people like you who like ECW for some reason make the argument that TNA should be getting better ratings since it has such a better roster. But all of the 4.0 rating people who used to watch Raw are aware of ECW. Those 4.0 rating people aren't all aware that TNA exists. And a lot of people have seen how horribly booked TNA is in the past that they won't give it another chance. |
|
|
|
Post by Ultimate Figure Collector on Oct 5, 2007 19:27:47 GMT -5
I'm not surprised at all to be honest. I've been saying for months now that two hours isn't gonna make much of a difference as far as booking and ratings go. It's still the same ole' TNA only instead of one hour of crapthey give us two hours of shit.
|
|
