|
|
Post by GBGav on Jan 26, 2006 14:49:58 GMT -5
I, for whatever strange reason, got my sig picture deleted by the staff because it was "too wide". It is the Father Ted one, you may or may not have seen it, and it didn't stretch the screen in any way, it fit within the width perfectly. Now, I have looked around and can't find any guides as to the maximum sig size allowed, for example: 500x200.
Can anyone give me the maximum measurements allowed for a sig image? I have been using that Father Ted image for a couple of weeks now without any bother so I'd like to know why they felt it was "too wide".
Thank You.
|
|
|
|
Post by bjd on Jan 26, 2006 15:24:07 GMT -5
I wish the TOS would be re-ammended to include signature guidelines.
My guideline is around 1000 pixels(example:500x500, 600x400) with no one side surpassing 600)... that doesn't mean you have to make your signature as big as possible though.
Mainly, screen stretching is the main problem. Try to have a signature that doesn't stretch across the whole signature box.
|
|
|
|
Post by GBGav on Jan 26, 2006 15:32:03 GMT -5
Thank you for that. My previous sig was about 700x250, maybe slightly more. I will re-size it easily, I just needed to know the dimensions first.
|
|
|
|
Post by PQ on Jan 27, 2006 3:53:34 GMT -5
you can check the ToS.
It's about 300*300 specified in the ToS.
But, the main thing is:
- not streching the screen.
- light sig, not 1,340ko.
- not that huge vertical sig either.
Be smart.
|
|
|
|
Post by PQ on Jan 27, 2006 7:59:10 GMT -5
Alright, I made a post recently asking for sig size limits. I got a reply from an admin saying it should be no bigger than 1000 pixels, with no one side being larger than 500 pixels. I resized my Father Ted sig so that it was 600x130 something. This was not breaking the limit, so why the hell has it been deleted for a second time? It is too damn confusing and I'm not happy about it. Would someone give me a definition of what is "too wide". I have seen other sigs in this forum that hit the 600 mark and have not been deleted. What's going on? |
|
