|
Post by Controversial Maverick PUNK on Jul 24, 2007 16:43:23 GMT -5
I'm also at a loss, as to why so many want Kennedy - he doesn't deserve it either... It might be an idea for him to actually become an established main-eventer on RAW - before he's given an opportunity to win the most prestigious belt in the company... because at present, he's nothing more than mid-card level... He hasn't been in the WWE, or on RAW long enough yet, to warrant receiving a title shot, anyway...
|
|
|
Post by gin on Jul 24, 2007 16:46:04 GMT -5
Jamie Noble?
|
|
|
Post by Controversial Maverick PUNK on Jul 24, 2007 16:52:08 GMT -5
LOL, at Foley, being one of the choices ;D...
|
|
|
Post by gin on Jul 24, 2007 16:56:01 GMT -5
LOL, at Foley, being one of the choices ;D... What wrong with Foley? He is probably the only one that does crazy ass bumps to put other people over.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 16, 2024 17:28:05 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 24, 2007 17:06:09 GMT -5
Foley doesnt need to be near the belt if he is going to wrestle. He should be used to put people over because he does it well. I could go for a Foley/Punk feud though.
|
|
|
Post by Controversial Maverick PUNK on Jul 24, 2007 17:24:02 GMT -5
LOL, at Foley, being one of the choices ;D... What wrong with Foley? He is probably the only one that does crazy ass bumps to put other people over. Sorry - I forgot that Mick Foley has been wrestling on RAW every week, and would be a credible and logical choice, to challenge Cena...
|
|
|
Post by gin on Jul 24, 2007 17:35:14 GMT -5
What wrong with Foley? He is probably the only one that does crazy ass bumps to put other people over. Sorry - I forgot that Mick Foley has been wrestling on RAW every week, and would be a credible and logical choice, to challenge Cena... He was in that fatal four way title match at that one PPV.
|
|
noir
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 20, 2007 6:53:47 GMT -5
Posts: 4,278
|
Post by noir on Jul 24, 2007 17:42:04 GMT -5
Oh wow, I can't believe Hardy is third on the list, and this is coming from a long time Hardy fan. I think either Kennedy, Carlito or Booker. Each have proved they can handle the main event and have put on some impressive matches.
|
|
|
Post by Flyrfn144 on Jul 24, 2007 17:44:18 GMT -5
I'm also at a loss, as to why so many want Kennedy - he doesn't deserve it either... It might be an idea for him to actually become an established main-eventer on RAW - before he's given an opportunity to win the most prestigious belt in the company... because at present, he's nothing more than mid-card level... He hasn't been in the WWE, or on RAW long enough yet, to warrant receiving a title shot, anyway... Ok, as much as I want Orton to be champ, saying Kennedy is nothing more than mid card at best is very very stupid. I am sorry but Kennedy is much better than mid card. reason I don't see him deserving it is because he hasn't done anything really in mid card. I think a decent IC title reign first would be good for him.
|
|
|
Post by christian1cage on Jul 24, 2007 17:47:39 GMT -5
I can't believe William Regal (member) is saying that Jeff Hardy should be challenging for the title. Cena vs. Hardy? Is that a joke? Nobody in their right mind would pay pocket change to see that. Jeff Hardy will never be a credible main eventer.
Randy Orton has been near the top for four years. He has ok mic skills but can be counted on to cut an intense promo when needed. He has cocky attitude that is matched by nobody. He is solid in the ring and can have a good match with the right opponent easily. Cena-Booker has been done LOADS of times. And Kennedy hasn't won nearly enough on Raw to warrant a title shot. He's never been a consistent main eventer either. Orton is clearly the top heel on the show. I really don't see how you can argue that.
|
|
|
Post by Andrewghbk99 on Jul 24, 2007 17:47:47 GMT -5
Imo Mr. Kennedy is Stale and Boring. That's just me. I want Orton in the M.E. at Summerslam.
|
|
|
Post by Flyrfn144 on Jul 24, 2007 17:49:51 GMT -5
I can't believe William Regal (member) is saying that Jeff Hardy should be challenging for the title. Cena vs. Hardy? Is that a joke? Nobody in their right mind would pay pocket change to see that. Jeff Hardy will never be a credible main eventer. Randy Orton has been near the top for four years. He has ok mic skills but can be counted on to cut an intense promo when needed. He has cocky attitude that is matched by nobody. He is solid in the ring and can have a good match with the right opponent easily. Cena-Booker has been done LOADS of times. And Kennedy hasn't won nearly enough on Raw to warrant a title shot. He's never been a consistent main eventer either. Orton is clearly the top heel on the show. I really don't see how you can argue that. Thank YOU! Finally, someone who agrees with me.
|
|
|
Post by therock32 on Jul 24, 2007 17:50:57 GMT -5
Hardy.
|
|
|
Post by Flyrfn144 on Jul 24, 2007 17:52:30 GMT -5
I am baffled on why some of you think Jeff Hardy deserves the WWE title.
|
|
|
Post by therock32 on Jul 24, 2007 17:57:39 GMT -5
I am baffled on why some of you think Jeff Hardy deserves the WWE title. Jeff Hardy has been with the WWE for almost 8 yrs. and is well over. and can put on some great matches (last night for example) He has been in the WWE longer than everyone on that list besides HHH and Foley, and takes a beating better than most. Since hes been back theres been no negative reports about him, but Orton on the other hand there has. Hardy deserves it alot more than Orton or Kennedy. He actually works his ass off unlike Orton who is lazy and unreliable.
|
|
|
Post by Controversial Maverick PUNK on Jul 24, 2007 18:00:00 GMT -5
I am baffled on why some of you think Jeff Hardy deserves the WWE title. Then, that's your problem... If you don't know why, then I'm not going to tell you...
|
|
|
Post by Flyrfn144 on Jul 24, 2007 18:01:57 GMT -5
I am baffled on why some of you think Jeff Hardy deserves the WWE title. Jeff Hardy has been with the WWE for almost 8 yrs. and is well over. and can put on some great matches (last night for example) He has been in the WWE longer than everyone on that list besides HHH and Foley, and takes a beating better than most. Since hes been back theres been no negative reports about him, but Orton on the other hand there has. Hardy deserves it alot more than Orton or Kennedy. He actually works his ass off unlike Orton who is lazy and unreliable. How can you say Orton is lazy. He put on good matches this past year with DX, and had a great performance in MITB at WM. Hardy tries to hard to be over and that messes him up. I see a botch in every match that Hardy has. And Hardy never changes anything he does. Not saying his move set is basic and doesn't vary but he always has to do the whisper in the wind, and the slingshot dropkick thing(not sure exactly what it's called)
|
|
|
Post by gin on Jul 24, 2007 18:05:11 GMT -5
I am baffled on why some of you think Jeff Hardy deserves the WWE title. Jeff Hardy has been with the WWE for almost 8 yrs. and is well over. and can put on some great matches (last night for example) He has been in the WWE longer than everyone on that list besides HHH and Foley, and takes a beating better than most. Since hes been back theres been no negative reports about him, but Orton on the other hand there has. Hardy deserves it alot more than Orton or Kennedy. He actually works his ass off unlike Orton who is lazy and unreliable. They don't think the hardys have enough Mic skill to be main eventers. And you forgot Val Venis and Hacksaw
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jul 24, 2007 18:06:40 GMT -5
I'm also at a loss, as to why so many want Kennedy - he doesn't deserve it either... It might be an idea for him to actually become an established main-eventer on RAW - before he's given an opportunity to win the most prestigious belt in the company... because at present, he's nothing more than mid-card level... He hasn't been in the WWE, or on RAW long enough yet, to warrant receiving a title shot, anyway... Hardy isn't an established main-eventer. Hardy is nothing more than mid-card level. He already had one shot, he hasn't done anything to deserve another.
|
|
|
Post by Controversial Maverick PUNK on Jul 24, 2007 18:09:20 GMT -5
I can't believe William Regal (member) is saying that Jeff Hardy should be challenging for the title. Cena vs. Hardy? Is that a joke? Nobody in their right mind would pay pocket change to see that. Jeff Hardy will never be a credible main eventer.Randy Orton has been near the top for four years. He has ok mic skills but can be counted on to cut an intense promo when needed. He has cocky attitude that is matched by nobody. He is solid in the ring and can have a good match with the right opponent easily. Cena-Booker has been done LOADS of times. And Kennedy hasn't won nearly enough on Raw to warrant a title shot. He's never been a consistent main eventer either. Orton is clearly the top heel on the show. I really don't see how you can argue that. Jeff Hardy is the most over star on RAW - but of course, nobody would pay to see him in the main event, and take the belt from Cena ... Sorry that I'm not a sheep, who agrees with all these Orton fans, who have suddenly come crawling out of the woodwork...
|
|