|
|
Post by gin on Jul 25, 2007 16:00:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by theeggman on Jul 25, 2007 16:09:42 GMT -5
Good job. I dont know about everyone else but I knew my view didnt count before.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Jul 25, 2007 16:16:28 GMT -5
I already explained this in a thread about last weeks RAW rating because people don't understand the concept of ratings...
|
|
|
|
Post by gin on Jul 25, 2007 16:27:50 GMT -5
I already explained this in a thread about last weeks RAW rating because people don't understand the concept of ratings... You gave an estimate of what a 3.4 rating equals. It said nothing about how the ratings work. Thanks. |
|
|
|
Post by jlk on Jul 25, 2007 16:38:46 GMT -5
Interesting...thanks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Jul 25, 2007 16:47:15 GMT -5
I already explained this in a thread about last weeks RAW rating because people don't understand the concept of ratings... You gave an estimate of what a 3.4 rating equals. It said nothing about how the ratings work. Thanks. I said that 50 % (or 115.2 million people) of the United States are subject to these Nielsen ratings... And of that 50% for every 0.1 rating = 1% of the population tested, that is 1,152,000 people (I believe) watching. Therefore you multiply 3.4 by 1,152,000 to get over 3 Million People. That is how the Ratings system essentially works... I explained that in my post, I wasn't estimating. Of the people who have Nielsen boxes or are subjected to the survey from Nielsen... 3,916,800 people watched RAW this week and last week... Also since I already know about this and didn't bother to read it I am not sure if it mentioned Share... So if you were ever wondering what it meant when you are reading the Raw Ratings and it had like a "4.2 Share" that is what it is... |
|
|
|
Post by gin on Jul 25, 2007 17:23:36 GMT -5
You gave an estimate of what a 3.4 rating equals. It said nothing about how the ratings work. Thanks. I said that 50 % (or 115.2 million people) of the United States are subject to these Nielsen ratings... And of that 50% for every 0.1 rating = 1% of the population tested, that is 1,152,000 people (I believe) watching. Therefore you multiply 3.4 by 1,152,000 to get over 3 Million People. That is how the Ratings system essentially works... I explained that in my post, I wasn't estimating. Of the people who have Nielsen boxes or are subjected to the survey from Nielsen... 3,916,800 people watched RAW this week and last week... Also since I already know about this and didn't bother to read it I am not sure if it mentioned Share... So if you were ever wondering what it meant when you are reading the Raw Ratings and it had like a "4.2 Share" that is what it is... You never said any of that. K thanks. |
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Jul 25, 2007 17:30:05 GMT -5
To be fair, Neilson Ratings are representative of only half of America (115.2 million people). 1 rating point equals 1 % or 1,152,000 people watching. Therfore 3.0 means 3,456,000 people still watched RAW. So in that effect, 3.0 is not indicative of Cena being a ****ty champ or the WWE being a sinking ship because over 3 million people still watch it... By the way, if you are wondering where I am pulling this from: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neilson_ratings#Ratings_.2F_share_and_total_viewers Ah, thank you  |
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Jul 25, 2007 17:37:09 GMT -5
Well, now that we know the Ratings process matters about as much as the electoral college...goodnight.
|
|
