|
|
Post by tnaleader on Aug 2, 2007 19:13:38 GMT -5
Instead of having Nash accompany Hall and Kane in a mach with Angle and Hennig on Heat, why didnt they have Nash vs Kane and Perfect vs Angle?
|
|
|
|
Post by Sound888 on Aug 2, 2007 19:15:43 GMT -5
Why didn't they have Austin vs Rock vs Triple H at a Wrestlemania?
|
|
Lebowski
Superstar
Joined on: Nov 9, 2008 15:05:32 GMT -5
Posts: 765
|
Post by Lebowski on Aug 2, 2007 19:17:29 GMT -5
Nash was injured... as usual...
|
|
Drummerboy
Main Eventer
Lumber Liquidators PBA Tour.
Joined on: Sept 8, 2003 8:38:22 GMT -5
Posts: 4,405
|
Post by Drummerboy on Aug 2, 2007 19:23:12 GMT -5
LOL All you'd have to do is poke nash and he'd fall down in pain haha,
But yeah, Perfect Vs Angle would have ruled all.
|
|
|
|
Post by cccmrkennedy on Aug 2, 2007 19:47:38 GMT -5
Yeah, I ask the EXACT same questions everyday.
|
|
|
|
Post by chaz on Aug 2, 2007 19:50:54 GMT -5
LOL All you'd have to do is poke nash and he'd fall down in pain haha, But yeah, Perfect Vs Angle would have ruled all. Quite true. Just ask Hulk Hogan. .. Oh. |
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Aug 2, 2007 20:05:06 GMT -5
From what I heard, the reason they didn't book Nash in a match was so he could face Austin if Hall managed to get fired before Wrestlemania.
|
|
|
|
Post by Barrett on Aug 2, 2007 20:31:31 GMT -5
From what I heard, the reason they didn't book Nash in a match was so he could face Austin if Hall managed to get fired before Wrestlemania. Yep. That's what I was going to say. |
|
leafs911
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 18, 2007 22:56:50 GMT -5
Posts: 2,004
|
Post by leafs911 on Aug 2, 2007 20:33:23 GMT -5
Nash was injuried, but they should have done Angle vs Perfect
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 28, 2024 0:39:44 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 2, 2007 22:07:13 GMT -5
From what I heard, the reason they didn't book Nash in a match was so he could face Austin if Hall managed to get fired before Wrestlemania. Why didn't they just book Nash vs. Austin from the start then? |
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Aug 2, 2007 23:44:49 GMT -5
From what I heard, the reason they didn't book Nash in a match was so he could face Austin if Hall managed to get fired before Wrestlemania. Why didn't they just book Nash vs. Austin from the start then? Because Austin tying Nash to a chair and locking him in a walk-in refridgerator full of beer wouldn't have made any sense. |
|
|
|
Post by The UndyTaker on Aug 3, 2007 0:45:31 GMT -5
Nash got injured clicking the mouse button to read this thread.
|
|
|
|
Post by eggman on Aug 3, 2007 2:55:07 GMT -5
Nash got injured clicking the mouse button to read this thread. That was after he injured himself trying to sit onto the seat  |
|
Nitro
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 29, 2006 18:50:40 GMT -5
Posts: 3,839
|
Post by Nitro on Aug 3, 2007 4:24:45 GMT -5
they did kane/nWo rivalry straight after wrestlemania x8 anyways..
which resulted in kane losing his original mask
|
|
|
|
Post by cpj19892 on Aug 3, 2007 5:09:21 GMT -5
I have no clue why WWF didn't take advantage of Angle vs. Perfect. I hope they were kicking themselves in February 2003.
|
|
