|
|
Post by DZ: WF Legacy on Oct 21, 2007 16:39:10 GMT -5
I say go the late ECW route with one PPV every 2 months.
Royal Rumble (JAN)
Wrestlemania (MAR)
King of the Ring (MAY)
Great American Bash (JULY)
SummerSlam (SEP)
Survivor Series (NOV)
|
|
Sabufan1
Superstar
That's for fathering that piece of crap!!
Joined on: Aug 20, 2006 16:09:19 GMT -5
Posts: 805
|
Post by Sabufan1 on Oct 21, 2007 16:45:45 GMT -5
I actually am a little dissapointed about their decisions to drop PPVs because I think that the more matches they could give us, the better. Plus, I never pay for PPVs anyway so this just takes away the hype for a PPV event. |
|
|
|
Post by yungking23 on Oct 21, 2007 17:12:59 GMT -5
I actually am a little dissapointed about their decisions to drop PPVs because I think that the more matches they could give us, the better. Plus, I never pay for PPVs anyway so this just takes away the hype for a PPV event. Hey man I pay for my cable, I just don't pay for PPVs. If someone is being kind enough to show a free stream then why not take advantage of it? Thousands of people who can't afford PPVs (including myself) do it and until someone gets caught there's nothing wrong with it. Paying $500 a year for PPVs is crazy so streams are the way to go. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 8:45:02 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2007 17:22:37 GMT -5
One every 2 or 3 months
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 8:45:02 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2007 17:23:46 GMT -5
Hey man I pay for my cable, I just don't pay for PPVs. If someone is being kind enough to show a free stream then why not take advantage of it? Thousands of people who can't afford PPVs (including myself) do it and until someone gets caught there's nothing wrong with it. Paying $500 a year for PPVs is crazy so streams are the way to go. Either way it's illegal jerk off |
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Oct 21, 2007 17:35:07 GMT -5
another one bites the dust.
|
|
|
|
Post by ICW on Oct 21, 2007 17:40:20 GMT -5
Good. Too many Pay Per Views
|
|
|
|
Post by xbonex80 on Oct 21, 2007 17:54:13 GMT -5
Royal Rumble
No Way Out
Wrestlemania
Backlash
Judgement Day
King Of The Ring
Vengeance
SummerSlam
Cyber Sunday
No Mercy
Survivor Series
Armageddon
not too much different from a few years ago but I like it...
if only they would bring back in your house
|
|
|
|
Post by fair2flair on Oct 21, 2007 18:08:37 GMT -5
They should have one every sunday night but charge 9.95 for each one. I would order all of them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thick Justice on Oct 21, 2007 18:25:39 GMT -5
Royal Rumble No Way Out Wrestlemania Backlash Judgement Day King Of The Ring Vengeance SummerSlam Cyber Sunday No Mercy Survivor Series Armageddon not too much different from a few years ago but I like it... if only they would bring back in your house I agree with the ones you chose however howabout a Saturday Night Main Event every couple of months one in end of March, one first Saturday of January, one 8 days before Survivor Series, one 8 days before Summerslam, 8 days before King of the Ring with the winners of that tournament of 8 people, 4 matches, will move on and also have the World Champions face eachother for the King of Champions title. Also make one of the SNME's all Hardcore. Have a title defended at every PPV in the Main Event and have a number one contendership be at every SNME. |
|
Sabufan1
Superstar
That's for fathering that piece of crap!!
Joined on: Aug 20, 2006 16:09:19 GMT -5
Posts: 805
|
Post by Sabufan1 on Oct 21, 2007 19:00:01 GMT -5
Hey man I pay for my cable, I just don't pay for PPVs. If someone is being kind enough to show a free stream then why not take advantage of it? Thousands of people who can't afford PPVs (including myself) do it and until someone gets caught there's nothing wrong with it. Paying $500 a year for PPVs is crazy so streams are the way to go. Woah woah calm down I was just joking with you. If I could STEAL PPVs without getting caught I would do it to. |
|
|
|
Post by LeighD on Oct 21, 2007 20:39:56 GMT -5
Good, less PPV's means they mean more which means people will be intrested to buy since they will have nough time to build feuds and matches ^ Exactly. I wish WWE would have like 8-10 PPVs and have like a 2 hour PPV-like show shown on TV similiar to WCW's Clash of the Champions. |
|
|
|
Post by bobby on Oct 21, 2007 21:07:19 GMT -5
It's a great idea, because I for one found it completely idiotic when WWE was hosting a ppv every 2 weeks in mid 2007, for example:
Backlash(2 weeks)Judgment Day(2 weeks)ONS(2 weeks)Vengeance
|
|
|
|
Post by TeamExtreme718x on Oct 21, 2007 21:12:12 GMT -5
This is great new they should have the big 4 and then have No way out, Backlash, no Mercy and Amragedon I agree.. These are always my favorite PPV (themes) |
|
|
|
Post by Random Hero Est. 2003 on Oct 21, 2007 22:21:11 GMT -5
To be honest, I think it would be tons more entertaining this way. It would make some feuds mean something. And it would also make for more exciting regular TV in my opinion. They could have small feuds leading into bigger feuds to give other wrestlers chances to shine in the main events. AND, if WWE only had like 4 PPVs imagine ticket sales! Also, lesser ppvs could lead to more ppv-caliber matches being shown on all three brand's television shows each week. I really wish WWE would cut down on their number of ppvs; 6 or 8 at the very most would be plausible. |
|
|
|
Post by Ultimate Figure Collector on Oct 22, 2007 0:18:12 GMT -5
WWE will never drop back down to four, six or even eight PPV's unfortunately. It's always gonna be 12 or more.
|
|
|
|
Post by HHH316 on Oct 22, 2007 0:40:53 GMT -5
I've been a huge fan of the idea of 6 PPV's a year. It helped when the brand split took place & each show had about 2 months to build storylines.
|
|
Fury
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 21, 2007 21:19:09 GMT -5
Posts: 4,257
|
Post by Fury on Oct 22, 2007 1:42:34 GMT -5
WWE aren't gonna drop down to that many PPV's, it would be an idiotic move for them. They know they are shelling out 200,000 hardcore buys every PPV bigger on the big 4. Them reducing PPV's would mean TNA would run monthly PPV's and attract more buyers who want their PPV fix.
Sometimes I too think they are a bit crammed and I hope they do only do 1 a month (which their never gonna drop beneath) because I am basically only buying 1 a month anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by Barrett on Oct 22, 2007 1:48:01 GMT -5
I've been a huge fan of the idea of 6 PPV's a year. It helped when the brand split took place & each show had about 2 months to build storylines. Each show had the option of utilizing the two months to build storylines, but they rarely did. They'd spend one month building up to a special PPV-esque edition of their show, and then spend the next month scurrying to put together storylines for the PPV. |
|
|
|
Post by compton on Oct 22, 2007 1:57:09 GMT -5
There should only be 6 - 8 PPVs a year. 7 would be a happy medium.
|
|
