|
|
Post by shelleyrules on Aug 14, 2007 23:32:33 GMT -5
WWE released the buyrate information for June's One Night Stand pay-per-view. The show did 115,000 domestic buys and 185,000 overall -- way down from last year's 304,000 buys. This was the second lowest drawing PPV show for the company in North America since 1996 and one of the five lowest of all-time.
Source: PWInsider.com
|
|
|
|
Post by JCF on Aug 14, 2007 23:33:33 GMT -5
Wow. But it was an awesome show.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 9:27:51 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2007 23:36:26 GMT -5
thats what they get for a crapy main event maybe if lashley had a personality i would of worked but just look at him
|
|
robby.blade
Main Eventer
64 Refs
Joined on: Jan 16, 2007 13:52:35 GMT -5
Posts: 4,382
|
Post by robby.blade on Aug 14, 2007 23:47:36 GMT -5
its because it was "WWE One Night Stand" and not "ECW One Night Stand". The first One Night Stand would have been perfect if they didn't have the "WWE Invaders". The second was worse because of Cena and other WWE guys that had nothing to do with ECW being featured on the card.
|
|
|
|
Post by Iron Man on Aug 15, 2007 0:09:23 GMT -5
Thank God. Hopefully they cut down to 12 PPVs.
|
|
eso
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 22, 2007 4:44:58 GMT -5
Posts: 1,175
|
Post by eso on Aug 15, 2007 0:19:28 GMT -5
didnt the first ecw ppv do like 500,000?
|
|
|
|
Post by STOMWIJF on Aug 15, 2007 0:40:00 GMT -5
WWE need to cut down on shows and PPVs to make them fresh and interesting again.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 9:27:51 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2007 6:04:25 GMT -5
Why'd it take two 1/2 months for this info to come in?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 9:27:51 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2007 6:34:34 GMT -5
its because it was "WWE One Night Stand" and not "ECW One Night Stand". The first One Night Stand would have been perfect if they didn't have the "WWE Invaders". The second was worse because of Cena and other WWE guys that had nothing to do with ECW being featured on the card. But, we got the Triple H doesn't work Tuesdays bit. |
|
|
|
Post by Blackjack on Aug 15, 2007 8:01:32 GMT -5
Because a lot of people thought it was going to be ECW only and it wasn't
|
|
|
|
Post by schilling4senate on Aug 15, 2007 8:11:17 GMT -5
its because it was "WWE One Night Stand" and not "ECW One Night Stand". The first One Night Stand would have been perfect if they didn't have the "WWE Invaders". The second was worse because of Cena and other WWE guys that had nothing to do with ECW being featured on the card. the second ONS was actually really good,The Cena Rvd match was crazy.I bought it just to see the crowd reactions. |
|
Anaconda Vice
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 6, 2007 15:13:08 GMT -5
Posts: 3,263
|
Post by Anaconda Vice on Aug 15, 2007 9:00:13 GMT -5
WWE need to cut down on shows and PPVs to make them fresh and interesting again. |
|
|
|
Post by greenjack1992 on Aug 15, 2007 9:08:45 GMT -5
its because it was "WWE One Night Stand" and not "ECW One Night Stand". The first One Night Stand would have been perfect if they didn't have the "WWE Invaders". The second was worse because of Cena and other WWE guys that had nothing to do with ECW being featured on the card. The reason we had the 'Anti-ECW' guys there was so that ECW wrestlers could beat up Eric Bischoff in the Hammerstien Ballroom and finally do something entertaining with that boring SOB. I agree that Cena shouldn't have even been in the building but I enjoyed the Terry Funk & Dreamer vs Foley & Edge match. But you're totally right the first ONS owned the second one and I just don't regard WWE ONS as anything. |
|
|
|
Post by MondayRaw on Aug 15, 2007 9:30:54 GMT -5
I ordered it..Decent show
|
|
|
|
Post by taker1 on Aug 15, 2007 9:38:13 GMT -5
That would be because people are stupid and didn't give the show a chance because " It WaSnT tEH EcDBub!" The card looked good, and the PPV ended up being very entertaining( 2nd only to Backlash IMO). 2nd lowest PPV since '96 is ridiculous..
|
|
|
|
Post by j2dacversion3 on Aug 15, 2007 10:22:17 GMT -5
That really sucks, it was such a great show.
|
|
|
|
Post by caveman on Aug 15, 2007 10:50:27 GMT -5
I'm sure Vince and the boys will somehow blame it on ECW.
Why would people want to buy another WWE PPV? They should have kept it strictly ECW. December to Dismember tanked because they only advertised the elimination chamber. Why would anyone order it for just that? It wasn't ECW's fault. Stupid WWE.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr.GT on Aug 15, 2007 11:10:34 GMT -5
Wow. Thats really awful. That show sucked.
|
|
|
|
Post by embalmer on Aug 15, 2007 11:15:01 GMT -5
HA, maybe one day PPVs will actually mean something again as well instead of having like 20 a month.
|
|
|
|
Post by Codesters on Aug 15, 2007 11:36:12 GMT -5
Whyd it take so long for this info to come out?  |
|
