|
|
Post by dufflebagboi on Dec 31, 2007 17:28:58 GMT -5
i gotta question have undertaker and HBK ever wrestled each other ever since his injury in 1998?
|
|
|
|
Post by Edge618 on Dec 31, 2007 17:37:25 GMT -5
i dont think so, other than at Royal Rumble '07 which doesnt really qualify as a "match"
And then at No Way Out, Taker and Batista vs HBK and Cena, and then the rematch on Raw
|
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Dec 31, 2007 17:37:51 GMT -5
Only a little stint in the Royal Rumble, I think.
|
|
|
|
Post by brethartthehitman on Dec 31, 2007 18:31:21 GMT -5
i gotta question have undertaker and HBK ever wrestled each other ever since his injury in 1998? watch the no way out tag match from this year! find the rematch from raw on youtube closest thing both are really good |
|
|
|
Post by Flyrfn144 on Dec 31, 2007 18:32:26 GMT -5
HBK/Taker is one feud that needs to happen before one of them retires.
|
|
|
|
Post by Iron Man on Dec 31, 2007 19:32:56 GMT -5
HBK/Taker is one feud that needs to happen before one of them retires. It wouldn't really work. Both are faces and even if one turned heel, he would still be a face. And I don't like face vs. face tbh |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 16, 2024 7:37:04 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2007 19:48:20 GMT -5
HBK/Taker is one feud that needs to happen before one of them retires. It wouldn't really work. Both are faces and even if one turned heel, he would still be a face. And I don't like face vs. face tbh HBK turns on HHH. Revenge from 2002. |
|
|
|
Post by Heresy on Dec 31, 2007 21:04:32 GMT -5
HBK/Taker is one feud that needs to happen before one of them retires. It wouldn't really work. Both are faces and even if one turned heel, he would still be a face. And I don't like face vs. face tbh Holy crap. You wouldn't want two of WWE's best of all time, uncrowned legends who've evolved together over the past 15 years, in one last encounter simply because you think face vs. face feuds don't work? Undertaker pulled a damn good face vs. face feud out of Batista this past year. Same for HBK with John Cena. Taker and HBK together, with their history and experience, could pull off a christly feud with little difficulty... forget the face/heel dynamic, it wouldn't (and shouldn't) apply. |
|
|
|
Post by Flyrfn144 on Dec 31, 2007 21:11:06 GMT -5
It wouldn't really work. Both are faces and even if one turned heel, he would still be a face. And I don't like face vs. face tbh Holy ****. You wouldn't want two of WWE's best of all time, uncrowned legends who've evolved together over the past 15 years, in one last encounter simply because you think face vs. face feuds don't work? Undertaker pulled a damn good face vs. face feud out of Batista this past year. Same for HBK with John Cena. Taker and HBK together, with their history and experience, could pull off a christly feud with little difficulty... forget the face/heel dynamic, it wouldn't (and shouldn't) apply. Exactly, HBK/Taker would be Godly to all degrees, and if done right, feud of the century. |
|
The Stranger
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 21, 2007 1:09:47 GMT -5
Posts: 2,200
|
Post by The Stranger on Dec 31, 2007 21:11:34 GMT -5
It wouldn't really work. Both are faces and even if one turned heel, he would still be a face. And I don't like face vs. face tbh Holy ****. You wouldn't want two of WWE's best of all time, uncrowned legends who've evolved together over the past 15 years, in one last encounter simply because you think face vs. face feuds don't work? Undertaker pulled a damn good face vs. face feud out of Batista this past year. Same for HBK with John Cena. Taker and HBK together, with their history and experience, could pull off a christly feud with little difficulty... forget the face/heel dynamic, it wouldn't (and shouldn't) apply. Well said. Completely agreed. This is the last best feud two current superstars can have, that can still go. |
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Dec 31, 2007 21:21:21 GMT -5
If Taker-Michaels doesn't happen in 08, I seriously hope TNA beats WWE in the ratings. I don't even care how, or when or what needs to happen for that proclamation to become a little piece of reality. But it should be if WWE can't put this together after 2 years of teasing it and countless years of it being just a dream match of sorts.
|
|
|
|
Post by Flyrfn144 on Dec 31, 2007 21:39:40 GMT -5
If Taker-Michaels doesn't happen in 08, I seriously hope TNA beats WWE in the ratings. I don't even care how, or when or what needs to happen for that proclamation to become a little piece of reality. But it should be if WWE can't put this together after 2 years of teasing it and countless years of it being just a dream match of sorts. Especially with rumors of 08 being the last year for Taker, and I've also heard possibly HBK. |
|
