Mirror Images
Main Eventer
fan since '92
Joined on: Jun 7, 2005 4:07:40 GMT -5
Posts: 2,809
|
Post by Mirror Images on Jan 1, 2008 13:54:51 GMT -5
 Does that look like a man who should be regarded as the best wrestler in the world. My answer is NO. |
|
|
|
Post by thetaker13 on Jan 1, 2008 13:59:22 GMT -5
No. It would be an insult to him, giving him a title. The titles have barely any (or in CW's case, none at all) prestige, and it would insult everything he's done. I severely doubt that giving him a title would be having him "on top". Give him a main event spot, at a big-name PPV, and make him win the match. agreed |
|
|
|
Post by markallenkellner on Jan 1, 2008 14:13:56 GMT -5
Let him win the belt at WM and retire as champ
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hammers on Jan 1, 2008 14:29:19 GMT -5
Only if he was gonna lose it to someone who could gain main event status out of it.... Like Kennedy. Flair could win the Rumble, win the title at Mainia have a three month title run then lose the title cleanly to Mr Kennedy at..... Vengeance?. Kennedy becomes WWE Champion, gets Main Event Status and Flair can retire a happy man.
|
|
|
|
Post by Overnight Sensation on Jan 1, 2008 16:08:00 GMT -5
Nobody deserves it more than he does he needs to go out on top...if he doesnt Vince can suck it
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Jan 1, 2008 16:18:17 GMT -5
Have him win it at Wrestlemania in an Evolution Fatal Four Way Match, and Retain it in Singles Matches at each following PPV against Triple H, Randy Orton and Batista, before loosing it at Vengeance or something.
|
|
Raw is DanHBK
Main Eventer
Possible Bad Trader
Joined on: Oct 4, 2004 12:50:35 GMT -5
Posts: 4,989
|
Post by Raw is DanHBK on Jan 1, 2008 16:24:34 GMT -5
If Hogan got one, why not Flair? A similar reign to Hogan's 2002 run would fit perfectly
|
|
|
|
Post by Zeke on Jan 1, 2008 16:32:09 GMT -5
he should win the WWE World Championship for like 3 months then lose it & his career.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Best on Jan 1, 2008 17:08:31 GMT -5
No I wouldn't.
|
|
|
|
Post by htmlegend on Jan 1, 2008 17:17:34 GMT -5
I would give him one more run, but it wouldn't last more than a month.
|
|
Wago
Main Eventer
Prepare To Get Wagowned.
Joined on: Mar 29, 2006 9:11:27 GMT -5
Posts: 1,495
|
Post by Wago on Jan 1, 2008 17:43:31 GMT -5
No, he is not bringing anything to the game anymore, not that he has in a long time.
Doesn't deserve it now, he is not doing anything to benefit the business, sorry if you don't like that but its true, the belts should go to the guy who is helping the business progess in some way, and I find he absolutely boring in ring, especially at house shows, me and my friend was commentating the moves before they happened because all he does is chop chop chop.
Ric deserved the belt when he was the man, he is not anymore, the only place in the business he has now is putting guys over, manager, or do something behind the scenes, though I think he would be a good GM.
|
|
|
|
Post by Greg Weinstein on Jan 1, 2008 18:44:45 GMT -5
No.
Sixteen is a good number.
|
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Jan 1, 2008 21:02:24 GMT -5
yes, i would as i think it would be profitable if they marketed it right, and because unlike many others who believe in the tried-and-true form of 'hand it down to the young guys' it's like...stfu, you do what works, and flair could work.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stevo on Jan 1, 2008 21:09:50 GMT -5
Flair needs to win the title and retire with it. It could be in the same night, it doesn't really matter. But, what other way is there for THE Ric Flair to go out other than holding the title? It doesn't have to be on a gigantic stage like Wrestlemania, it doesn't even have to be on PPV. It could just be on something like RAW in MSG. Still, he NEEDS that belt one last time.
Besides, a tournament would re-energize the World Title division.
|
|
robl7up
Main Eventer
139 refs
Joined on: Feb 16, 2006 12:34:15 GMT -5
Posts: 2,848
|
Post by robl7up on Jan 1, 2008 21:34:05 GMT -5
Win it at WRESTLEMANIA....Retire the next night on RAW.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. McCluer on Jan 1, 2008 22:12:36 GMT -5
No, i like flair and have always been a fan, but noway cause i think younger talent should rawk those beast's
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 31, 2024 23:29:45 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 1, 2008 22:32:30 GMT -5
Id rather (and Im sure most people would rather) have a three year Flair title run over a week Hardy run my friend. Disssssssssssssssss! OMG! You dissed Hardy! Best Joke EVer!!11!!1! Seriously, get a better joke!  I wasnt attempting to make a joke. You claim Hardy deserves to be champ, but that Flair does not. Thats just pure stupidity in my eyes |
|
|
|
Post by Gussy on Jan 1, 2008 22:35:26 GMT -5
Like someone said above...the wwe title isnt as prestiges as it was back when flair started winning them so giving him the belt isnt the brightest idea....especially a spinner wwe belt...if it were the world heavyweight title..the best flair was famous for..then maybe but not no spinner and such.
|
|
|
|
Post by WalterF on Jan 1, 2008 22:37:31 GMT -5
I think he's been champ so many times that it wouldn't add to him any. I LOVE Flair, one of my favorites of all time, but I think the current angle is perfect. Have his last match be a close, intense battle, an amazing match and have him lose cleanly, going out w/ respect and on top.
|
|
|
|
Post by 49% Motherf**ker, 51% SOB on Jan 1, 2008 22:40:24 GMT -5
It doesn't matter if he wins 5 more, Triple H is gonna pass it.
|
|
