|
Post by Trypod on Mar 18, 2008 15:13:58 GMT -5
You're rooting for Kennedy and saying MVP needs 2-3 years? I'd consider MVP way more ready than Kennedy. Anyway, I'm sick of the MITB matches. I'd rather see everyone involved have their own storyline. Even if some of the storylines were with each other in seperate feuds. MVP is not ready. Kennedy should have been main eventing WM24 tbh. MVP sucks on the microphone and is a very boring wrestler who's only good matches were against Chris Benoit. Kennedy is everything you just said of MVP. He's the vanilla ice cream of wrestlers. There's nothing special to Kennedy.
|
|
|
Post by Iron Man on Mar 18, 2008 15:27:29 GMT -5
MVP is not ready. Kennedy should have been main eventing WM24 tbh. MVP sucks on the microphone and is a very boring wrestler who's only good matches were against Chris Benoit. Kennedy is everything you just said of MVP. He's the vanilla ice cream of wrestlers. There's nothing special to Kennedy. What is so special about MVP? Kennedy is far better on the mic then MVP. And he has had more matches I enjoy with Benoit, Finlay, Lashley, HBK, Taker, Carlito...
|
|
|
Post by Trypod on Mar 18, 2008 15:33:17 GMT -5
I just find MVP to have a much more interesting character that would do much better in the main event. I'm not necessarily saying he should be there now, but he's more ready than Kennedy.
Kennedy is just.. blah. There's nothing that screams 'superstar' about him. He can say his name really loud and continues to have average match after average match.
|
|
Ari Gold
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 16, 2007 20:04:07 GMT -5
Posts: 2,346
|
Post by Ari Gold on Mar 18, 2008 18:54:56 GMT -5
Yeah, sorry for not living on the forums every second of my life and keeping a list of what's been posted already. I forgive you. lmao
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Mar 18, 2008 19:30:42 GMT -5
I think one way or another the titles wouldn't be defended.
Remember, WM 18 was around the last time they all were defended one one show, that means 19 and 20 had no excuse, as there was no Money in the Bank.
Sure a U.S. title, Tag Team title, and generally any match with Jericho could have been good as a stand alone. But the MITB is a 15-30 matches. I don't even think the 3 title matches you are suggesting have enough alloted time. If they did, it'd be limited as is.
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Mar 18, 2008 19:32:26 GMT -5
I just find MVP to have a much more interesting character that would do much better in the main event. I'm not necessarily saying he should be there now, but he's more ready than Kennedy. Kennedy is just.. blah. There's nothing that screams 'superstar' about him. He can say his name really loud and continues to have average match after average match. ok, name me 5 really good MVP matches, excluding Benoit? I'm pretty sure he was comparing "character", not wrestling attributes. I could say I prefer Santino Marella be booked. Fact is, he entertains me more. I don't have to name the last "really good" Santino match to support my opinion in that case.
|
|
|
Post by Lorenzo Alcazar on Mar 18, 2008 19:40:46 GMT -5
No need to worry about Santino.....I would bet that he gets involved in Bunnymania....perhaps to "steal-a Jerry Stupid Lawlers delicious sub-a-way sandwich" again......
LOL
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 22, 2024 20:14:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2008 19:48:14 GMT -5
I think the point of them using some guys who are champs already is to just get a good ladder match. If they didn't do that who is left? A ladder match with Mark Henry, Big Daddy V, and Khali
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Mar 18, 2008 19:49:08 GMT -5
No need to worry about Santino.....I would bet that he gets involved in Bunnymania....perhaps to "steal-a Jerry Stupid Lawlers delicious sub-a-way sandwich" again...... LOL Not my point, I was just saying to the guy that mistook Character for In Ring Prowess, that it's possible to want some one whose on your TV and is enjoyable... but not always for the quality of their last match.
|
|
|
Post by HugoOne on Mar 18, 2008 23:17:10 GMT -5
Like I said before, when the Money in the Bank matches start to suck, I'll be against it. But considering all previous three have been a highlight of Wrestlemania, I'm all for it. Besides, guys like Morrison and Carlito wouldn't even be in Mania otherwise.
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Mar 18, 2008 23:17:40 GMT -5
I think the point of them using some guys who are champs already is to just get a good ladder match. If they didn't do that who is left? A ladder match with Mark Henry, Big Daddy V, and Khali Who says there has to be a ladder match at all? The MITB matches are going to get increasingly worse and more stale if they keep doing it year after year, the same way Hell In A Cell matches have, too.
|
|
|
Post by Lorenzo Alcazar on Mar 18, 2008 23:19:50 GMT -5
Seriously though....arguing about wrestling makes people look really intellectually- disabled. It's worse than politics.
People with one point of view will NEVER convince somebody with an opposing point of view to see it their way.....so what is arguing about it NON-STOP going to prove.
The people who want Undertakers streak broken are ALWAYS going to want it broken, and people who NEVER want it to get broken are ALWAYS never going to want it broken and NOBODY will ever agree.
People who think Kennedy should win will never agree with anybody else who wants THEIR favorite wrestler and everybody else is ALWAYS going to want THEIR favorite wrestler to win also.
Me....I watch wrestling like a TV SHOW.....which is what it is. I watch it and take it for what it is. It's funny how when people watch shows like 24, South Park, CSI....whatever it is you might watch....nobody ARGUES about certain characters and what roles THEY believe they should be portraying...like in X-files people aren't like "man they are holding Scully down"....
Wrestling is JUST A TV SHOW....you WATCH IT....and then MOVE ON. People get to obsessed and wrapped up in it and take it too personally.
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Mar 19, 2008 1:11:35 GMT -5
Not my point, I was just saying to the guy that mistook Character for In Ring Prowess, that it's possible to want some one whose on your TV and is enjoyable... but not always for the quality of their last match. Ok so whats wrong with me liking Kennedy and thinking he should win? Ugh. Does any body read any more? You complained about MVP matches when some one else complained about Kennedy matches. Problem is, this was never about matches, rather about character. Like if I like Big Daddy V, I don't expect a wrestling showcase of orgasmic proportions. In other words, I named Santino to make an example of character. Which is what this mess was originally aimed at.
|
|
Fury
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 21, 2007 21:19:09 GMT -5
Posts: 4,257
|
Post by Fury on Mar 19, 2008 4:30:11 GMT -5
Kennedy is everything you just said of MVP. He's the vanilla ice cream of wrestlers. There's nothing special to Kennedy. What is so special about MVP? Kennedy is far better on the mic then MVP. And he has had more matches I enjoy with Benoit, Finlay, Lashley, HBK, Taker, Carlito... Ok I'll take Ric Flair from this year as a case and point as to why I think MVP is better than Kennedy (I like Kennedy btw) But MVP's promo's and interactions with Flair were much more entertaining and better than Kennedy's plus MVP's matches with Flair (whilst not great) were still good and better than Kennedy's. He has put on a more entertaining feud than Kennedy has (his one with Hardy), his matches with Batista have been real good (better than Kennedy's) and he definantely has the makings of a future world's champ, although I think Kennedy does as well, it's just I'd take MVP over Kennedy right now. MVP is rapidly improving and is developing into one of the better promo guys in WWE.
|
|
|
Post by Iron Man on Mar 19, 2008 9:12:52 GMT -5
What is so special about MVP? Kennedy is far better on the mic then MVP. And he has had more matches I enjoy with Benoit, Finlay, Lashley, HBK, Taker, Carlito... Ok I'll take Ric Flair from this year as a case and point as to why I think MVP is better than Kennedy (I like Kennedy btw) But MVP's promo's and interactions with Flair were much more entertaining and better than Kennedy's plus MVP's matches with Flair (whilst not great) were still good and better than Kennedy's. He has put on a more entertaining feud than Kennedy has (his one with Hardy), his matches with Batista have been real good (better than Kennedy's) and he definantely has the makings of a future world's champ, although I think Kennedy does as well, it's just I'd take MVP over Kennedy right now. MVP is rapidly improving and is developing into one of the better promo guys in WWE. The same was said about Kennedy on SD last year. He was great on the mic, had a nice long feud with Taker and was getting a nice push and then he was moved to RAW. Fury can you please tell me who Kennedy is currently feuding with? Exactly, with the exception of HBK Kennedy has done NOTHING on Raw. That is why everyone seems to be hating on him latley. MVP is on Smackdown but if he were moved to RAW he would be the same way.
|
|