Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 21:49:33 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2006 7:25:00 GMT -5
Underworld is such a boring franchise.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deano on Jan 22, 2006 7:47:35 GMT -5
My uncle is having a clear-out of his old vids, so he has justgave me these:
The House Of Usher
Rosemary's Baby
Plauge Of The zombies
Mary Shelly's Frankenstein
Night Of the Living Dead
Blood Suckers
Vampire Knights
Vampire Circus
The Invisible Dead
Mask Of Murder
Moma Dracula
Sure, they are vids and not DVD's, but who cares when you've got them all for free?
Anyone seen any of these films?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 21:49:33 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2006 8:33:20 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Suckasays on Jan 22, 2006 8:51:59 GMT -5
Frankie Muniz in a horror movie, I dont know about that. Heres the plot: While playing an online horror game, a group of teens notice that once their characters die ... they die.....sounds pretty awful Sounds like they might have somewhat ripped that from the movie "Brainscan". |
|
|
|
Post by K.J.V. on Jan 22, 2006 9:29:27 GMT -5
All the TCM's look and are the same. Leatherface chasing people around in the backwoods. I'm not one of those guys who thinks the original TCM was some masterful work of art. In fact, the first time I watched it I was so  ing bored out of my mind. I was waiting for the "shock" but I never found it. I think the remake is more entertaining. |
|
|
|
Post by sim on Jan 22, 2006 12:25:58 GMT -5
Underworld is such a boring franchise. I totally agree. I thought I was the only one that disliked the Underworld movies. Why don't we form an anti Underworld faction? |
|
|
|
Post by K.J.V. on Jan 22, 2006 12:29:04 GMT -5
Let's do it! Kate may be hot in the movie at times, but the movies ing BLOW. |
|
|
|
Post by CC84 Johnny Ginger on Jan 22, 2006 15:00:26 GMT -5
the underworld films arent that bad of films...  |
|
|
|
Post by Suckasays on Jan 22, 2006 18:12:38 GMT -5
I never bothered with Underworld. The trailers tell me that I won't like it.
|
|
|
|
Post by K.J.V. on Jan 22, 2006 21:27:21 GMT -5
the underworld films arent that bad of films... Actually, yes..yes they are. |
|
|
|
Post by sim on Jan 22, 2006 22:16:12 GMT -5
the underworld films arent that bad of films... :-/ They aren't bad...they just aren't good either. I don't understand the "OMFG SHEZ A HOTZ VAMPYR DAT WEERZ LETHER N SHOOTZ THRU DA 4LOOR" thing. The action is scrambled and hard to follow, the storyline is cheesy and is pretty much lifted from Blade, and the ing characters are so dull and boring that it isn't worthwhile to watch. There's just no redeeming qualities to the films. If I want to watch a good vampire action flick, I'll catch Blade II or I'll watch Near Dark. |
|
|
|
Post by CC84 Johnny Ginger on Jan 22, 2006 22:26:50 GMT -5
I didnt like the first Underworld at all though, i liked Underworld Evolution though because it told more about the characters, it had more action scenes, and it was overall decent better than the first by far.
The Lost Boys and Near Dark are the two best vampire films.
|
|
Tyler Durden
Main Eventer
Joined on: Dec 21, 2001 18:00:54 GMT -5
Posts: 3,111
|
Post by Tyler Durden on Jan 22, 2006 22:36:35 GMT -5
Underworld is certaintly by no means a great movie...I think we can all at least agree on that
|
|
|
|
Post by CC84 Johnny Ginger on Jan 23, 2006 19:49:43 GMT -5
Is anyone going to get The Fog tommorow on DVD? Im not..but i guess its worth watching once, but if your a fan of the original The Fog then you will be dissapointed IMO.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cult Member BriGuy on Jan 23, 2006 21:32:55 GMT -5
Does Requiem for a Dream count as a horror movie? cause it scared the out of me |
|
|
|
Post by K.J.V. on Jan 23, 2006 22:42:57 GMT -5
Hell no I'm not getting the new Fog.
|
|
Tyler Durden
Main Eventer
Joined on: Dec 21, 2001 18:00:54 GMT -5
Posts: 3,111
|
Post by Tyler Durden on Jan 24, 2006 1:35:33 GMT -5
I'll have to rent the Fog on netflix...have to see it at some point, even though its pretty much a guarantee its gonna suck
|
|
|
|
Post by K.J.V. on Jan 24, 2006 1:38:33 GMT -5
It's on the IMDB bottom 100 lol. Usually, they have pretty good opinions about the bottom 100.
|
|
|
|
Post by jerrysafunnyguy on Jan 24, 2006 5:30:45 GMT -5
the underworld films arent that bad of films... :-/ They aren't bad...they just aren't good either. I don't understand the "OMFG SHEZ A HOTZ VAMPYR DAT WEERZ LETHER N SHOOTZ THRU DA 4LOOR" thing. The action is scrambled and hard to follow, the storyline is cheesy and is pretty much lifted from Blade, and the ing characters are so dull and boring that it isn't worthwhile to watch. There's just no redeeming qualities to the films. If I want to watch a good vampire action flick, I'll catch Blade II or I'll watch Near Dark. I enjoyed the completely different take that Underworld took on the vampire/werewolf genre. Especially since no one had ever made a movie where both species existed, let alone interacted. As for the characters, yeah, Scott Speedman sucks, but the whole Romeo/Juliet thing with two different fantasy species was cool in my opinion. The only thing anyone could actually say they stole from Blade is the costumes and cool weapons....and even Blade stole those. I enjoyed the first Underworld film a lot, even if the final fight was lackluster and the reveal of the mixed monster was weak. |
|
|
|
Post by jerrysafunnyguy on Jan 24, 2006 5:32:40 GMT -5
Underworld is certaintly by no means a great movie...I think we can all at least agree on that Which horror movie is? Very few actually fully encompass what equals good. Which is good production value, good acting, good story, good dialogue, and good photography for the most part. Most horror movies now only have good violence. Anyone can film violence. Making it mean something is where most filmmakers fail. |
|
