LuchaBoyWF
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 29, 2002 20:40:00 GMT -5
Posts: 1,000
|
Post by LuchaBoyWF on Jan 12, 2008 23:37:16 GMT -5
I'd say SNL, because no matter how many good cast members and chemistry they lost, Mad TV has failed to capitalize. It tries too hard to be edgy and controversial (like TNA)
All Micheal Mcdonald (who i dont think is very funny) has to do is look into the camera with a straight face and say "Black people are lazy", crowd GOES NUTS!!! I just dont understand it
|
|
|
Post by BV on Jan 12, 2008 23:40:46 GMT -5
IMO Both were funny, now there just plain cheesy...
|
|
|
Post by Rant Casey on Jan 12, 2008 23:43:59 GMT -5
I really dug the first couple years of Mad TV, when David Herman was on there it was with out a doubt one of the funniest shows ever.
That being said SNL would win, Mad TV has went down in years.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 12, 2008 23:51:39 GMT -5
MadTV had a few good years, but over all SNL is better.
|
|
|
Post by bowlofpetunias on Jan 12, 2008 23:51:51 GMT -5
Both are God-awful. I guess that's what happens when you get old (eh, Lorne), you lose whatever passion you once had.
|
|
|
Post by PID on Jan 13, 2008 3:55:41 GMT -5
I choose SNL because Mad TV never had Phil Hartman.
|
|
|
Post by ruthlessagression on Jan 13, 2008 9:27:33 GMT -5
MadTV. They have Stewart and how can you not love the guy/kid?
|
|
|
Post by Flava Dave on Jan 13, 2008 9:45:23 GMT -5
SNL. No matter how bad SNL is, it can never be any worse than MadTV.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 6, 2024 21:09:11 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2008 12:34:47 GMT -5
SNL is so unfunny and akward to watch. Ofcourse it had actual funny people through the years like Murphy, Ferrell, Farley etc., but that show just sucks as a whole. MadTV is better but they never seem to keep the funnier people in the cast long.
|
|
|
Post by layzie on Jan 13, 2008 12:40:54 GMT -5
SNL, madtv has always been horrible.
|
|
|
Post by Greg Weinstein on Jan 13, 2008 12:41:52 GMT -5
SNL. Wayyyyyy better.
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy on Jan 13, 2008 12:45:39 GMT -5
SNL. No matter how bad SNL is, it can never be any worse than MadTV. yup
|
|
|
Post by Quanthor on Jan 13, 2008 13:15:03 GMT -5
Some of the earlier seasons of MadTV were really good when it was more bizarre and surreal, but MadTV at it's best really doesn't compare to SNL's best seasons.
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Jan 13, 2008 14:56:39 GMT -5
SNL even now it's still funnier. One digital short can easily make MadTV look much worse. The only sketch I've ever enjoyed from MadTV was the Spishack My First Oven sketch.
|
|
|
Post by JTG on Jan 13, 2008 18:35:21 GMT -5
A lot of people blast SNL nowadays, but I think it still manages to put on a pretty entertaining show. My vote went to SNL.
|
|
|
Post by -Edge- on Jan 13, 2008 22:31:20 GMT -5
always likes mad tv, just the older seasons, screw the seasons now
|
|
PdW2kX
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 8, 2007 23:34:52 GMT -5
Posts: 4,551
|
Post by PdW2kX on Jan 13, 2008 22:32:01 GMT -5
MadTV's peak was a couple of years ago, when they had people like Frank Caliendo.
But I still voted for MadTV. I've simply never liked SNL...ever. No matter what time frame it is, I just can't get into it. Although MadTV has easily jumped the shark this season, so I don't really watch either right now.
|
|
|
Post by fattic on Jan 13, 2008 22:33:45 GMT -5
Mad TV was the crap in like, 2000/2001, but SNL takes the cake these days by far.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 6, 2024 21:09:11 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2008 22:38:51 GMT -5
Wait, people actually watched MadTV?
Pornos had better acting
|
|
|
Post by bowlofpetunias on Jan 13, 2008 22:51:01 GMT -5
Wait, people actually watched MadTV? Pornos had better acting That's the Groundlings for ya.
|
|