|
|
Post by Kemp2k on Jan 31, 2008 20:33:12 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 7, 2024 5:24:11 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 31, 2008 20:43:00 GMT -5
I don't want a Cloverfield sequel, but I'll still see it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rant Casey on Jan 31, 2008 20:46:23 GMT -5
It would have to be done differently if they want it to be good. Something like a person was doing a documentary about a branch of the National Guard and then all hell breaks loose. If they try to re-create the first one completely it will make some money at the box office but no one will honestly give a crap.
I hope to god Paramount does not turn this into the new "Saw" franchise and churn one out a year to capitalize on the hype of the first one.
|
|
|
|
Post by Edgeman05 on Jan 31, 2008 20:48:14 GMT -5
It would have to be done differently if they want it to be good. Something like a person was doing a documentary about a branch of the National Guard and then all hell breaks loose. If they try to re-create the first one completely it will make some money at the box office but no one will honestly give a ****. I hope to god Paramount does not turn this into the new "Saw" franchise and churn one out a year to capitalize on the hype of the first one. Agreed!! Would suck major balls. |
|
Stinger TNA
Main Eventer
"Support TNA"
Joined on: Mar 31, 2010 19:21:13 GMT -5
Posts: 1,481
|
Post by Stinger TNA on Jan 31, 2008 20:58:45 GMT -5
I thought itd be a cool idea, to start with some other dude filming The bridge collapse on Beth and Rob, and then have him trying to survive, learning more about the monster.
|
|
|
|
Post by amxfiles on Jan 31, 2008 21:00:56 GMT -5
Maybe if we're "lucky" it'll take the Blair Witch route for it's sequel..........
|
|
|
|
Post by Flyrfn144 on Jan 31, 2008 21:44:36 GMT -5
If they don't try and build off the Rob and Beth story, and focus more on the origins of the monster, it won't really ruin the first one, because the first one was about the friends surviving, this one will be from a different POV
|
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Jan 31, 2008 22:33:21 GMT -5
I don't want a Cloverfield sequel, but I'll still see it. Thats how I feel. I think it could potentially ruin the first one, but at the same time, I loved the first one so much that I couldn't stay away if I tried. |
|
|
|
Post by Codesters on Jan 31, 2008 22:34:05 GMT -5
Id like to see Cloverfield two in a theatrical camera style.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Feb 1, 2008 0:13:15 GMT -5
How about no sequel.
|
|
|
|
Post by chumped on Feb 1, 2008 0:19:19 GMT -5
I don't want a Cloverfield sequel, but I'll still see it. Thats how I feel. I think it could potentially ruin the first one, but at the same time, I loved the first one so much that I couldn't stay away if I tried. Same here |
|
|
|
Post by jake_317 on Feb 1, 2008 6:21:35 GMT -5
Well, i think a sequel would ruin the original, but again, i'd watch it.
Cloverfield has that "Donnie Darko" quality, where you pretty much come up with your own conclusion of what exactley happened in the movie, and because of questions that go unanswered.
But, it seems that too many people are worried about what exactley the Cloverfield beast is, that they had to make a sequel, with the kinf od dough they are problay tossing at him after Cloverfield did so well, i wonder what anyone else would do in his position.
Also, i bet they show alternate angles and scenes of the monster, in between trying to figure out what it is.
|
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Feb 1, 2008 9:13:06 GMT -5
Cloverfield II: Electric Boogaloo
|
|
