|
|
Post by Ian from 616Entertainment. on Nov 4, 2007 3:33:35 GMT -5
No Mercy 2003 drew 4,000.... According to Wrestling Information Archives, it drew 9000 Checked my book.... Somehow I confused No Mercy 2003 with Taboo Tuesday 2004, which drew 3,500. |
|
PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Nov 4, 2007 6:59:16 GMT -5
Trust me on this, the 1500 from Pacman didn't show. They had a reserved area for them, and it was pretty much empty.
|
|
|
|
Post by taker1 on Nov 4, 2007 8:18:33 GMT -5
Maybe its because TNA's version of Wrestlemania just about matched WWE's worst PPV of 2004 in terms of attendance. How is that a good thing again? It doesn't matter how bad nor good the PPV is for attendance numbers. Regardless, of if every match was ***** or * - the fact is WWE drew 5,000 & TNA drew 4,000. That's not what he's saying. Everybody knows BFG is TNA's biggest PPV of the year, while Armageddon is one of WWE's smallest. How does it look when WWE's smallest PPV outnumbers TNA's biggest by 1000 fans? bad. |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Nov 4, 2007 11:03:15 GMT -5
It doesn't matter how bad nor good the PPV is for attendance numbers. Regardless, of if every match was ***** or * - the fact is WWE drew 5,000 & TNA drew 4,000. That's not what he's saying. Everybody knows BFG is TNA's biggest PPV of the year, while Armageddon is one of WWE's smallest. How does it look when WWE's smallest PPV outnumbers TNA's biggest by 1000 fans? bad. I understand that and all but the way I look at it is - it's not like WWE came in & sold out 13,000 fans & TNA only drew 4,000. That would be bad. They was 1,000 away from WWE (even if it was the smallet PPV's) which is good - in a way because it shows they can draw close to WWE number's in the building but like people have said it's bad because it's the smallest WWE show vs. the biggest TNA show. I think it's a positive for TNA because their number went down in Nashville by 500 (which is bad since it was a homecoming type thing) but they was able to "pop" back up even it was only getting 500 back. I'm not saying it's the greatest number but it's impressive number in my book. |
|
|
|
Post by dmallett4 on Nov 4, 2007 11:21:32 GMT -5
Why does it matter how many people they drew? Surely if the in ring performance was better, then thats all that matters.
And for the record, the number isnt impressive at all.
|
|
E-Noon
Main Eventer
"Classic"
Joined on: Mar 30, 2004 17:11:23 GMT -5
Posts: 3,567
|
Post by E-Noon on Nov 4, 2007 13:10:32 GMT -5
According to Wrestling Information Archives, it drew 9000 Checked my book.... Somehow I confused No Mercy 2003 with Taboo Tuesday 2004, which drew 3,500. Wasn't that in Puerto Rico though... |
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Nov 4, 2007 13:21:29 GMT -5
Checked my book.... Somehow I confused No Mercy 2003 with Taboo Tuesday 2004, which drew 3,500. Wasn't that in Puerto Rico though... No, that was New Years Revolution. However, poor attendance for Taboo Tuesday could be chalked up to the fact that it was a Tuesday Night PPV which is stupid... All PPV's need to be on Sunday so I could assume that it was one of those events that no one cares about... And BTW, according to WIA, that also drew 9000... The second Taboo Tuesday drew 6,000, first Cyber Sunday drew 7000 and the numbers for this years Cyber Sunday haven't come in yet... |
|
|
|
Post by the franchise on Nov 4, 2007 13:30:42 GMT -5
If that was TNA's biggest show then shouldn't the numbers be compared to the WWE's biggest show.
|
|
|
|
Post by foshizzle on Nov 4, 2007 13:30:56 GMT -5
Maybe its because TNA's version of Wrestlemania just about matched WWE's worst PPV of 2004 in terms of attendance. How is that a good thing again? It doesn't matter how bad nor good the PPV is for attendance numbers. Regardless, of if every match was ***** or * - the fact is WWE drew 5,000 & TNA drew 4,000. Dude...TNA drew 5000 on their BIGGEST PPV. WWE drew MORE THAN THAT on their WORST! Catch my drift? |
|
|
|
Post by therealjswo on Nov 4, 2007 13:43:12 GMT -5
You people should know by now that anything SodaGoof says is said in positive manner toward TNA. He's the chief TNA propaganda kid here. There's no sense in even discussing TNA with him because he's to far into the forest to see the trees.
|
|
|
|
Post by Blackjack on Nov 4, 2007 16:29:52 GMT -5
1. It didn't have 4000 people there, no way
2. Just because Pacman bought 1500 doesn't mean 1500 people showed up. I actually think none of those showed up. Didn't he give them to a South Carolina school? SC & ATL, GA is a good drive.
3. 4000 is great for TNA. Glad if they're happy with that number.
|
|
PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Nov 4, 2007 18:41:36 GMT -5
Trust me on this, the 1500 from Pacman didn't show. They had a reserved area for them, and it was pretty much empty. |
|
|
|
Post by javon on Nov 4, 2007 19:18:23 GMT -5
Maybe its because TNA's version of Wrestlemania just about matched WWE's worst PPV of 2004 in terms of attendance. How is that a good thing again? It doesn't matter how bad nor good the PPV is for attendance numbers. Regardless, of if every match was ***** or * - the fact is WWE drew 5,000 & TNA drew 4,000. I've been back for just a few days and I've already figured out who the current TNA mega-mark is, LOL. |
|
|
|
Post by jack on Nov 4, 2007 20:37:24 GMT -5
You people should know by now that anything SodaGoof says is said in positive manner toward TNA. He's the chief TNA propaganda kid here. There's no sense in even discussing TNA with him because he's to far into the forest to see the trees. Id sig this if the quote in my sig wasnt that damn funny. |
|
Too Sweet
Main Eventer
R.I.P MJ
Joined on: Sept 20, 2006 23:28:07 GMT -5
Posts: 3,611
|
Post by Too Sweet on Nov 4, 2007 20:42:17 GMT -5
It doesn't matter how bad nor good the PPV is for attendance numbers. Regardless, of if every match was ***** or * - the fact is WWE drew 5,000 & TNA drew 4,000. Dude...TNA drew 5000 on their BIGGEST PPV. WWE drew MORE THAN THAT on their WORST! Catch my drift? Yeah, but whos more Known? The WWE or TNA? Catch MY drift? |
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Asia on Nov 4, 2007 20:43:55 GMT -5
Ring of Honor has drawn 1,600 before and doesn't have near the star talent, equipment,marketing and funds that TNA does....
Your telling me TNA can only draw 3000 more fans than an indy fed at their biggest PPV of the year?
Lol...
|
|
PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Nov 6, 2007 7:03:06 GMT -5
Ring of Honor has drawn 1,600 before and doesn't have near the star talent, equipment,marketing and funds that TNA does.... Your telling me TNA can only draw 3000 more fans than an indy fed at their biggest PPV of the year? Lol... a lot has to do with the arena. Most of it was taped off because of how small the ring area is (much smaller entrance stage than WWE, and the area around the ring doesn't go as deep towards the other side lie at a WWE event). The only area not full was the spot reserved for Pacman's tickets. |
|
|
|
Post by Doomrider on Nov 6, 2007 10:14:27 GMT -5
You people should know by now that anything SodaGoof says is said in positive manner toward TNA. He's the chief TNA propaganda kid here. There's no sense in even discussing TNA with him because he's to far into the forest to see the trees. That's exactly what I was thinking. He is TNA's Jehovah's Witness. |
|
|
|
Post by Cammi Oh on Nov 6, 2007 20:51:15 GMT -5
Comparing the two companies is ridiculous. TNA is still in its infancy compared to the WWE. Give TNA a decade and we will see if the numbers are any closer.
|
|
|
|
Post by James Hetfield on Nov 6, 2007 21:47:25 GMT -5
I noticed a long time ago that SG was all over TNA's penis.
|
|
