|
|
Post by vedsor on Oct 4, 2007 12:04:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by alex123ecw on Oct 4, 2007 15:00:15 GMT -5
wtf, thats not even close to a side effect.
|
|
|
|
Post by vedsor on Oct 4, 2007 15:07:20 GMT -5
if he sat/layed on his back going through the table it would  anyway its the spideyfect its meant to be a bit different  |
|
|
|
Post by goalie on Oct 4, 2007 17:52:19 GMT -5
wtf, thats not even close to a side effect. Are you intellectually- disabled? |
|
|
|
Post by "Vintage" HBK Still Rules on Oct 4, 2007 21:30:44 GMT -5
if he sat/layed on his back going through the table it would anyway its the spideyfect its meant to be a bit different I was going to say some random "NuH Uh, TaT iZeNt A sIdE aFekT!!!" But since you give us an explanation, you can't argue with that logic. It's ok, Kinda like a Rock Bottom from a ladder through tables, but in pic#2, Spidey has too high of an angle and looks like he'll land on his head. |
|
|
|
Post by alex123ecw on Oct 4, 2007 22:06:11 GMT -5
if he sat/layed on his back going through the table it would anyway its the spideyfect its meant to be a bit different I was going to say some random "NuH Uh, TaT iZeNt A sIdE aFekT!!!" But since you give us an explanation, you can't argue with that logic. It's ok, Kinda like a Rock Bottom from a ladder through tables, but in pic#2, Spidey has too high of an angle and looks like he'll land on his head. thats exactly what i was thinking |
|
brucebenoit
Main Eventer
I'm not driven by fear I'm driven by anger
Joined on: Jul 8, 2007 13:37:23 GMT -5
Posts: 3,697
|
Post by brucebenoit on Oct 6, 2007 15:33:47 GMT -5
it's not the side effect it's the spidey effect lol
|
|
|
|
Post by vedsor on Oct 6, 2007 17:16:10 GMT -5
correction "spideyfect" not spidey effect  |
|
|
|
Post by whatever on Oct 9, 2007 23:50:53 GMT -5
Very original.
Props dude....props.
|
|
|
|
Post by vedsor on Oct 10, 2007 14:32:35 GMT -5
ok... ummm what, and why'd you top my post it was old and dying
|
|
