|
Post by tnafan4life on Mar 31, 2008 16:27:03 GMT -5
"Not once at any point in these precedings did they think, "Maybe we need to improve the onscreen product." In fact, looking at the history of Impact, the product was probably at its best when it was on FSN. "
Getting an avg. of a 0.3. What they need to do is combined it. Combine your primetime slot, on a bigger network with 2 hours with the in-ring performence of FSN days, mixed with more meaning. By that I mean, booking matches on iMPACT that mean something like they did last week with Booker T/Robert Roode, the main event, and Shelley/Devine. The in-ring product is fine, the tv deal is fine, it's everything around it.
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Mar 31, 2008 16:31:24 GMT -5
The Product was NOT at it's best when it was on FSN... the quality of the matches on iMPACt when it was on FSN were shit. They need to go back and book like they did in 2002-2003...
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Mar 31, 2008 17:10:56 GMT -5
The Product was NOT at it's best when it was on FSN... the quality of the matches on iMPACt when it was on FSN were ****. They need to go back and book like they did in 2002-2003... Wrestling penises for everybody!!!
|
|
PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Mar 31, 2008 18:57:02 GMT -5
OMG!!!! TNA's RATING WENT FROM 1.1 TO 1.0 THEY'RE DEAD!!!!
Seriously? I EXPECTED the rating to drop. On the same night, they were going up against The season finale of the Apprentice (which is a popular show like it or not) as well as one of the biggest NCAA basketball games of the year.
I love how when the RAW rating goes down on the same night as Monday Night Football, everyone says "oh well, it's because they had some stiff competition". When it happens to TNA it's because their products sucks. Now, was the show this past week great? No. Was it an awful show? I think it was okay at best.
But whatever. The pot calling the kettle black and what not...
|
|
|
Post by Eyce on Apr 2, 2008 19:02:11 GMT -5
It's been what, several months since the Women's Division has debuted and they still haven't got the hint that it's outrating everything else?
|
|