PenguinDeluxe
Main Eventer
20 Refs and Counting
Joined on: Dec 19, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,932
|
Post by PenguinDeluxe on Apr 5, 2008 22:44:18 GMT -5
Well, considering that WWE has only done the second one, and be doing the second one, I mean shoving Cena, Batista, Mysterio, etc. down our throats. Honestly, how many great PPVs has WWE had recently? A few. I can't say the last time I watched a bad TNA PPV (I didn't see LockDown's PPV, but it didn't sound to great. Slammiversary 07 was decent at best though) Survivor Series 2007 Armageddon 2007 Royal Rumble 2008 No Way Out 2008 Wrestlemania 24 you fail. I agree with SS07, NWO08 and WM24. Armageddon was Decent. The other 15 or however many PPVs they do weren't worth watching. you fail. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 25, 2024 23:36:14 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2008 22:47:43 GMT -5
So basically Lehtal feels like half the man Jericho is?
Jericho beat them BOTH in one night.
|
|
|
|
Post by Iron Man on Apr 5, 2008 22:50:45 GMT -5
Survivor Series 2007 Armageddon 2007 Royal Rumble 2008 No Way Out 2008 Wrestlemania 24 you fail. I agree with SS07, NWO08 and WM24. Armageddon was Decent. The other 15 or however many PPVs they do weren't worth watching. you fail. Royal Rumble 2007, NWO 2007, WM23, Backlash 2007, GAB 2007, Summer Slam 2007, No Mercy were all really good - decent. The last few TNA PPV's I have seen were horrible. Did you see the main event at turning point.... LMAO You Fail, sir |
|
|
|
Post by haz on Apr 6, 2008 13:19:48 GMT -5
Well, considering that WWE has only done the second one, and be doing the second one, I mean shoving Cena, Batista, Mysterio, etc. down our throats. Honestly, how many great PPVs has WWE had recently? A few. I can't say the last time I watched a bad TNA PPV (I didn't see LockDown's PPV, but it didn't sound to great. Slammiversary 07 was decent at best though) Survivor Series 2007 Armageddon 2007 Royal Rumble 2008 No Way Out 2008 Wrestlemania 24 you fail. Most of them sucked. Wrestlemania 24 was good though. |
|
|
|
Post by Iron Man on Apr 6, 2008 14:45:09 GMT -5
Survivor Series 2007 Armageddon 2007 Royal Rumble 2008 No Way Out 2008 Wrestlemania 24 you fail. Most of them sucked. Wrestlemania 24 was good though. Not really. Armageddon had the Kennedy/HBK, Jeff/Triple H, Taker/Tista/Edge which all three were vert good. Survivor Series had the 5 on 5, Taker/Tista, HBK/Orton from the top of my head were all good. Rumble- The Rumble Match was awesome, Flair/MVP was decent, Edge/Mysterio was decent, and Hardy/RKO was great. No Way Out- Both Elimination Chambers were awesome, The RAW EC is my favorite EC ever. Orton/Cena was good, Kennedy/Flair wasn't bad... |
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Apr 6, 2008 20:27:01 GMT -5
tna propaganda.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Apr 6, 2008 20:30:10 GMT -5
Lethal was crying cause he knew after pinning Angle his career was still gonna go NOWHERE
|
|
|
|
Post by j2dacversion3 on Apr 6, 2008 23:29:05 GMT -5
If The Rock and Austin went crazy I'd compare them to Kurt Angle, other than that... no dice.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ultimate Figure Collector on Apr 7, 2008 0:42:17 GMT -5
WWE and TNA both put out PPV's that aren't worth it. TNA PPV's were great in 2005-2006. Not anymore though.
Both WWE and TNA(more so WWE right now) have a few matches but overall the PPV is weak. TNA really doesn't have any good matches on PPV or anymore.
All that was good at this years Rumble was the Rumble match itself. Rey/Edge was decent as well. Hardy/Orton was very disspointing. Jericho/JBL was meh. Flair/MVP wasn't anything to write home about.
All that was good at No Way Out was the RAW Chamber. The Smackdown one might have been the worst ever. The rest of the PPV had nothing to write home about.
WrestleMania 24 had HBK/Flair, Taker/Edge & MITB. The triple threat and Finlay/JBL were decent.
As far as 2007.
Survivior Series 2007 was good. HBK/Orton, Taker/Batista, 5 on 5 & the ECW Title match were all really good. I give WWE props there.
WrestleMania 23 was good. HBK/Cena, Batista/Taker & MITB were all great. Benoit/MVP & Lashley/Umaga(which was Lashley's best match Umaga made him look good) were both decent.
SummerSlam 2007 was awful. Cena/Orton was the only thing decent. and it wasn't even that good to main event SummerSlam.
Royal Rumble 2007 had the rumble match itself and Cena/Umaga which were good. The rest was awful.
No Mercy had Triple H/Orton. That was it.
One or two good matches do not make a PPV great imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by BigShab421 on Apr 7, 2008 14:46:01 GMT -5
But he won a Gold Medal with a brokin' freakin' neck! Hmmm..... 6-Time WWF Heavyweight Champion Won championship three times at Wrestlemania on the main event. 2-Time WWF Intercontinental Champion 4-Time WWF World Tag Team Champion (with Dude Love, Shawn Michaels, The Undertaker and Triple H) 1-Time WWF (Unsanctioned) Million Dollar Champion 1996 King of the Ring winner 1997 Royal Rumble winner 1998 Royal Rumble winner 2001 Royal Rumble winner Only wrestler to win the Royal Rumble on three separate occasions. Not to mention he put on some of the greatest matches ever, most noted with the Rock, Undertaker, and his amazing everlasting feud with Vince that had no goofy **** involved like a midget, shark, or Vince's wife dating a missused upper mid-carder. vs [Roid Raged induced voice]A BROKEN FREAKIN NECK[/Roid Raged induced voice] ......Steve Austin wins. And here goes TNA with WWE's ideas. There is nowhere for the TNA marks to turn now. WWE put Interactive PPVs on the map, so yeah, TNA took it from the WWE's least profiting and arguably worst PPV they ever put on. Yeah but Angle has one thing over all these so called "wrestlers", he is an Olympic Gold Metalist. Angle will always be head and shoulders above "sports entertainers," because he is a real wrestler. Austin & Rock couldn't handle Angle if he was paralyzed. |
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Apr 7, 2008 18:45:10 GMT -5
Hmmm..... 6-Time WWF Heavyweight Champion Won championship three times at Wrestlemania on the main event. 2-Time WWF Intercontinental Champion 4-Time WWF World Tag Team Champion (with Dude Love, Shawn Michaels, The Undertaker and Triple H) 1-Time WWF (Unsanctioned) Million Dollar Champion 1996 King of the Ring winner 1997 Royal Rumble winner 1998 Royal Rumble winner 2001 Royal Rumble winner Only wrestler to win the Royal Rumble on three separate occasions. Not to mention he put on some of the greatest matches ever, most noted with the Rock, Undertaker, and his amazing everlasting feud with Vince that had no goofy **** involved like a midget, shark, or Vince's wife dating a missused upper mid-carder. vs [Roid Raged induced voice]A BROKEN FREAKIN NECK[/Roid Raged induced voice] ......Steve Austin wins. And here goes TNA with WWE's ideas. There is nowhere for the TNA marks to turn now. WWE put Interactive PPVs on the map, so yeah, TNA took it from the WWE's least profiting and arguably worst PPV they ever put on. Yeah but Angle has one thing over all these so called "wrestlers", he is an Olympic Gold Metalist. Angle will always be head and shoulders above "sports entertainers," because he is a real wrestler. Austin & Rock couldn't handle Angle if he was paralyzed. Too bad The Rock and Austin are A) a better draw than Angle ever wished he could be and B)Being an Olympic Gold Medalist don't mean crapin the world of Professional Wrestling. The fact of the matter is that if the ONLY thing Angle has going for him is his being an Amateur wrestler then he shouldn't be in TNA or the WWE... he should either be training for the Olympics or in UFC. Kurt Angle has FANTASTIC in ring abilities or at least he used to before he passed his prime. However in the world of Professional Wrestling, Kurt Angle can not hold a candle to Austin or Rock. Rock and Austin may not be the best damn technical wrestlers in the world however they put on damn great matches. Rock and Austin can talk circles around Kurt Angle. Rock/Austin was better than any Angle match I can think of simply because they are the two most charismatic showmen to ever step foot in the ring. As I said, Kurt used to be wonderfully gifted in the ring but to say that he one-ups Rock and Austin because he has an amateur wrestling background is a  ing joke... |
|
Too Sweet
Main Eventer
R.I.P MJ
Joined on: Sept 20, 2006 23:28:07 GMT -5
Posts: 3,611
|
Post by Too Sweet on Apr 8, 2008 0:28:43 GMT -5
I agree with some of the points you guys are saying, sure Austin and the Rock can draw big ratings and sell heaps of PPV's and so on, but compared to their in ring style Angle completely romps them without a doubt, while Angle might not be the most charismatic as both the Rock and Austin, Angle is pretty much one of the best Heavyweight wrestlers in the US in this decade in my opinion, I really find Austin and Rock matches quite slow and boring.
But what makes the Rock and Austin as big as they were is that they are great performers outside the ring which makes them interesting to watch, I mean Angle is the opposite of what he is in the Ring, he says some of the most cheesiest stuff you could say and can't really come up with some Originality and Character like Austin and The Rock can.
While it is awesome to see an Olympic Gold medalist do professional wrestling, having to whore out your achivements is pretty stupid, its been like over 10 years and he's still blurting on about being an Olympic Gold medalist its sickening.
|
|
|
|
Post by BigShab421 on Apr 8, 2008 21:54:06 GMT -5
I agree with some of the points you guys are saying, sure Austin and the Rock can draw big ratings and sell heaps of PPV's and so on, but compared to their in ring style Angle completely romps them without a doubt, while Angle might not be the most charismatic as both the Rock and Austin, Angle is pretty much one of the best Heavyweight wrestlers in the US in this decade in my opinion, I really find Austin and Rock matches quite slow and boring.But what makes the Rock and Austin as big as they were is that they are great performers outside the ring which makes them interesting to watch, I mean Angle is the opposite of what he is in the Ring, he says some of the most cheesiest stuff you could say and can't really come up with some Originality and Character like Austin and The Rock can. While it is awesome to see an Olympic Gold medalist do professional wrestling, having to whore out your achivements is pretty stupid, its been like over 10 years and he's still blurting on about being an Olympic Gold medalist its sickening. Yes, thank you. Austin and Rock are great performers. Angle is the greatest WRESTLER to ever grace a professional wrestling ring. And yes, he may not have been the greatest guy on the stick, but the intensity and work he puts into matches is phenomenal. The guy tells stories when he's in the ring, something many people cannot do anymore (Except HBK, Taker, Orton, etc...). I do agree with you on the bragging. Ok, everybody knows he's an Olympic Gold medalist and won it with a broken neck. Yes that is one of the greatest sport stories of all time, but they do not need to say it twice a week. Ok, you wear the medals to the ring and you have the American flag on your tights, we get it. Regardless, Angle is a better wrestler than anybody in recent memory, but Austin and Rock are two of the three greatest entertainers in the history of this business. |
|
|
|
Post by Iron Man on Apr 8, 2008 21:58:55 GMT -5
I agree with some of the points you guys are saying, sure Austin and the Rock can draw big ratings and sell heaps of PPV's and so on, but compared to their in ring style Angle completely romps them without a doubt, while Angle might not be the most charismatic as both the Rock and Austin, Angle is pretty much one of the best Heavyweight wrestlers in the US in this decade in my opinion, I really find Austin and Rock matches quite slow and boring.But what makes the Rock and Austin as big as they were is that they are great performers outside the ring which makes them interesting to watch, I mean Angle is the opposite of what he is in the Ring, he says some of the most cheesiest stuff you could say and can't really come up with some Originality and Character like Austin and The Rock can. While it is awesome to see an Olympic Gold medalist do professional wrestling, having to whore out your achivements is pretty stupid, its been like over 10 years and he's still blurting on about being an Olympic Gold medalist its sickening. Yes, thank you. Austin and Rock are great performers. Angle is the greatest WRESTLER to ever grace a professional wrestling ring. And yes, he may not have been the greatest guy on the stick, but the intensity and work he puts into matches is phenomenal. The guy tells stories when he's in the ring, something many people cannot do anymore (Except HBK, Taker, Orton, etc...). I do agree with you on the bragging. Ok, everybody knows he's an Olympic Gold medalist and won it with a broken neck. Yes that is one of the greatest sport stories of all time, but they do not need to say it twice a week. Ok, you wear the medals to the ring and you have the American flag on your tights, we get it. Regardless, Angle is a better wrestler than anybody in recent memory, but Austin and Rock are two of the three greatest entertainers in the history of this business. I think Benoit was a better wrestler then Angle, but meh |
|
|
|
Post by Mr. McCluer on Apr 8, 2008 22:51:56 GMT -5
Five broken necks? Is that even humanly possible? not really it could mean like just bones broken not meaning like neck brace but stuff broken up i dunno he exagertes but yea angle no where near rock or austin |
|
|
|
Post by edger316 on Apr 9, 2008 2:02:08 GMT -5
Are all TNA fans who chant this is awesome to the same crap every week ooooh somebody flew through the ropes and a muppet puts on a mask and pretends to be a superhero why cant tna come up with orignal ideas instead of mocking wwe god tna is trapped in 1999.
|
|
|
|
Post by mercennario1080 on Apr 9, 2008 14:11:40 GMT -5
Yes, thank you. Austin and Rock are great performers. Angle is the greatest WRESTLER to ever grace a professional wrestling ring. And yes, he may not have been the greatest guy on the stick, but the intensity and work he puts into matches is phenomenal. The guy tells stories when he's in the ring, something many people cannot do anymore (Except HBK, Taker, Orton, etc...). I do agree with you on the bragging. Ok, everybody knows he's an Olympic Gold medalist and won it with a broken neck. Yes that is one of the greatest sport stories of all time, but they do not need to say it twice a week. Ok, you wear the medals to the ring and you have the American flag on your tights, we get it. Regardless, Angle is a better wrestler than anybody in recent memory, but Austin and Rock are two of the three greatest entertainers in the history of this business. I think Benoit was a better wrestler then Angle, but meh I think it would be really hard to decide on who's better. Both were/are amazing in the ring. |
|
|
|
Post by The Funniest Guy in Pants on Apr 9, 2008 17:23:15 GMT -5
Hmmm..... 6-Time WWF Heavyweight Champion Won championship three times at Wrestlemania on the main event. 2-Time WWF Intercontinental Champion 4-Time WWF World Tag Team Champion (with Dude Love, Shawn Michaels, The Undertaker and Triple H) 1-Time WWF (Unsanctioned) Million Dollar Champion 1996 King of the Ring winner 1997 Royal Rumble winner 1998 Royal Rumble winner 2001 Royal Rumble winner Only wrestler to win the Royal Rumble on three separate occasions. Not to mention he put on some of the greatest matches ever, most noted with the Rock, Undertaker, and his amazing everlasting feud with Vince that had no goofy **** involved like a midget, shark, or Vince's wife dating a missused upper mid-carder. vs [Roid Raged induced voice]A BROKEN FREAKIN NECK[/Roid Raged induced voice] ......Steve Austin wins. It's interesting that you left out all the titles that Angle won in the WWE and completely ignored the fact that the Olympic Gold medal is the only "real" championship in this equation. Austin has had his fair share of crappy gimmicks. And you're simply lying if you say that Kurt Angle also hasn't put on some of the greatest matches ever. And you're calling TNA fans marks?  And here goes TNA with WWE's ideas. There is nowhere for the TNA marks to turn now. WWE put Interactive PPVs on the map, so yeah, TNA took it from the WWE's least profiting and arguably worst PPV they ever put on. I'm not going to defend TNA for ripping off WWE, because it is bullshit, but why is it that you WWE marks never call the WWE on their bullshit? Taboo Tuesday/Cyber Sunday is a rip off of ECW's CyberSlam. Why has no one mentioned that? Why is it ok for the WWE to steal other's ideas and creations? |
|
|
|
Post by Iron Man on Apr 9, 2008 17:37:15 GMT -5
Hmmm..... 6-Time WWF Heavyweight Champion Won championship three times at Wrestlemania on the main event. 2-Time WWF Intercontinental Champion 4-Time WWF World Tag Team Champion (with Dude Love, Shawn Michaels, The Undertaker and Triple H) 1-Time WWF (Unsanctioned) Million Dollar Champion 1996 King of the Ring winner 1997 Royal Rumble winner 1998 Royal Rumble winner 2001 Royal Rumble winner Only wrestler to win the Royal Rumble on three separate occasions. Not to mention he put on some of the greatest matches ever, most noted with the Rock, Undertaker, and his amazing everlasting feud with Vince that had no goofy **** involved like a midget, shark, or Vince's wife dating a missused upper mid-carder. vs [Roid Raged induced voice]A BROKEN FREAKIN NECK[/Roid Raged induced voice] ......Steve Austin wins. It's interesting that you left out all the titles that Angle won in the WWE and completely ignored the fact that the Olympic Gold medal is the only "real" championship in this equation. Austin has had his fair share of crappy gimmicks. And you're simply lying if you say that Kurt Angle also hasn't put on some of the greatest matches ever. And you're calling TNA fans marks? And here goes TNA with WWE's ideas. There is nowhere for the TNA marks to turn now. WWE put Interactive PPVs on the map, so yeah, TNA took it from the WWE's least profiting and arguably worst PPV they ever put on. I'm not going to defend TNA for ripping off WWE, because it is bull ****, but why is it that you WWE marks never call the WWE on their bull ****? Taboo Tuesday/Cyber Sunday is a rip off of ECW's CyberSlam. Why has no one mentioned that? Why is it ok for the WWE to steal other's ideas and creations? They did... |
|
|
|
Post by mercennario1080 on Apr 9, 2008 21:45:25 GMT -5
Hmmm..... 6-Time WWF Heavyweight Champion Won championship three times at Wrestlemania on the main event. 2-Time WWF Intercontinental Champion 4-Time WWF World Tag Team Champion (with Dude Love, Shawn Michaels, The Undertaker and Triple H) 1-Time WWF (Unsanctioned) Million Dollar Champion 1996 King of the Ring winner 1997 Royal Rumble winner 1998 Royal Rumble winner 2001 Royal Rumble winner Only wrestler to win the Royal Rumble on three separate occasions. Not to mention he put on some of the greatest matches ever, most noted with the Rock, Undertaker, and his amazing everlasting feud with Vince that had no goofy **** involved like a midget, shark, or Vince's wife dating a missused upper mid-carder. vs [Roid Raged induced voice]A BROKEN FREAKIN NECK[/Roid Raged induced voice] ......Steve Austin wins. It's interesting that you left out all the titles that Angle won in the WWE and completely ignored the fact that the Olympic Gold medal is the only "real" championship in this equation. Austin has had his fair share of crappy gimmicks. And you're simply lying if you say that Kurt Angle also hasn't put on some of the greatest matches ever. And you're calling TNA fans marks? And here goes TNA with WWE's ideas. There is nowhere for the TNA marks to turn now. WWE put Interactive PPVs on the map, so yeah, TNA took it from the WWE's least profiting and arguably worst PPV they ever put on. I'm not going to defend TNA for ripping off WWE, because it is bull ****, but why is it that you WWE marks never call the WWE on their bull ****? Taboo Tuesday/Cyber Sunday is a rip off of ECW's CyberSlam. Why has no one mentioned that? Why is it ok for the WWE to steal other's ideas and creations? You forgot they also used the nWo with the same members. |
|
