|
Post by bod8 on Apr 9, 2008 18:11:42 GMT -5
To anyone that has seen this, is it worth seeing? I've heard pretty mixed reviews so far
|
|
|
Post by amxfiles on Apr 9, 2008 18:15:53 GMT -5
After the cinematic tour de force that was the original, I don't see how it possibly live up to expectation.
|
|
|
Post by bod8 on Apr 9, 2008 18:18:57 GMT -5
What do you mean "tour de force" lol?
|
|
|
Post by chumped on Apr 9, 2008 18:49:59 GMT -5
When I read the title of the topic, I shook my head.
Don't see it.
|
|
|
Post by The Boondock Syxx on Apr 9, 2008 19:33:36 GMT -5
its absolutely terrible compared to the break out and well deserved blockbuster the original one is. I love the original but the only good part of this sequel is Channing tattum making a cameo appearance around 10 min into it. The girls team is like a group of retards there sickening to watch on screen. Although the lead star's rack is pretty nice I would avoid this and watch the original again.
|
|
Reasoning through Questioning
Main Eventer
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something. -Plato
Joined on: Oct 8, 2005 23:36:54 GMT -5
Posts: 3,598
|
Post by Reasoning through Questioning on Apr 9, 2008 22:54:20 GMT -5
To anyone that has seen this, is it worth seeing? I've heard pretty mixed reviews so far just no
|
|
|
Post by hurricane on Apr 10, 2008 0:42:29 GMT -5
Definately worth it. I've heard it was cinematically ground breaking tbh.
|
|
|
Post by amxfiles on Apr 10, 2008 0:47:16 GMT -5
What do you mean "tour de force" lol? You are ON the ing internet, couldn't just google that one up?
|
|
|
Post by HHH316 on Apr 10, 2008 0:51:29 GMT -5
What do you mean "tour de force" lol? You are ON the ing internet, couldn't just google that one up? I dont know what it means either, & I dont care enough to look it up. Plus if I did & it was stupid, I'd want that 20 seconds of my life back.
|
|
|
Post by deadman83 on Apr 17, 2008 0:41:11 GMT -5
it sucked
|
|