|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Nov 22, 2007 22:56:47 GMT -5
Yeah & look how terrible VR '07 turned out.. wait.. it was a good PPV.. go figure.
|
|
|
|
Post by Juba on Nov 22, 2007 23:02:44 GMT -5
Yeah & look how terrible VR '07 turned out.. wait.. it was a good PPV.. go figure. The only title match on this card is the knockout's title... how can you defend this pay per view |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Nov 22, 2007 23:23:32 GMT -5
Yeah & look how terrible VR '07 turned out.. wait.. it was a good PPV.. go figure. The only title match on this card is the knockout's title... how can you defend this pay per view So what? I never said the PPV was great. How the hell have I defended the PPV? I just said look how VR '07 turned out. Basically, just because the card looks bad doesn't mean the matchs themselves will be bad. |
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Asia on Nov 23, 2007 1:48:18 GMT -5
That Battle Royal is incredible stupid and a bush league way to hide the fact these wrestlers are paid by appearance...
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Nov 23, 2007 18:19:15 GMT -5
New Match Added via TNA Mobile:
Booker T & Kaz vs. Christian Cage & Robert Roode
|
|
Liu Kangaroo
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 21, 2005 12:55:24 GMT -5
Posts: 1,745
|
Post by Liu Kangaroo on Nov 23, 2007 18:57:39 GMT -5
so Kaz is supposed to be feuding with Robert Roode now?
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Nov 23, 2007 20:22:29 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure that the match wasn't suppose to be annouced yet.. remember theres one iMPACT left.  |
|
|
|
Post by Juba on Nov 23, 2007 23:03:21 GMT -5
eh...that match doesn't even make it better for me...im so ashamed in this card
|
|
|
|
Post by American Phenom on Nov 27, 2007 16:21:23 GMT -5
I was going to go, but decided that it's not worth it for me to drive there, wait in line all day, see the show, and drive home (with school the next day).
The pay-per-view doesn't look good at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Nov 27, 2007 17:17:54 GMT -5
New Match:
Angelina Love & Velvet Sky vs. O.D.B & Roxy LeVeaux!
|
|
|
|
Post by Juba on Nov 27, 2007 21:11:52 GMT -5
How many tag team matches can you have on one show
|
|
|
|
Post by rkolegendkilla on Nov 29, 2007 4:54:07 GMT -5
Yeah, this will be one of TNA's weaker pay-per-view's for sure.
Nothing jumps out and grabs me.
|
|
|
|
Post by jjkotm on Nov 29, 2007 20:26:55 GMT -5
This looks to easily be the worst show on paper for the year. How you expect people to pay $30 to see a show with no 1-on-1 matches involving men is beyond me.
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Nov 29, 2007 22:38:19 GMT -5
Shut up about no singles men matches because you got it:
Eric Young vs "Cowboy" James Storm.
|
|
|
|
Post by American Phenom on Nov 30, 2007 1:10:07 GMT -5
Wow. Young/Storm will be a dud.
Just like the whole Young/Roode feud.
If Final Resolution doesn't shape up to be good, I will not be attending that either.
The Feast or Fired makes absolutely no sense. TNA is already looking to be setting up Lethal/Devine, and Outsiders/Stomko. So why is their a #1 contenders match.
I think it'll probably end up LAX/Stomko and Lethal/Dutt at the next pay-per-view which both of those matches have been done before.
|
|
|
|
Post by dmallett4 on Nov 30, 2007 12:00:33 GMT -5
Shut up about no singles men matches because you got it: Eric Young vs "Cowboy" James Storm. how can you continue to defend this ppv? it is the worst card, by far, this year. |
|
|
|
Post by Juba on Nov 30, 2007 14:44:51 GMT -5
Shut up about no singles men matches because you got it: Eric Young vs "Cowboy" James Storm. how can you continue to defend this ppv? it is the worst card, by far, this year. atleast im not alone on this one |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Nov 30, 2007 17:15:08 GMT -5
Shut up about no singles men matches because you got it: Eric Young vs "Cowboy" James Storm. how can you continue to defend this ppv? it is the worst card, by far, this year. How the  did I defend the card with that? I said "Shut up about no singles men matches because you got it" Explain to me how that is defending a card? It's not. I was just saying shut up about no singles matches because you got it.. that's it. But, of course people take my words & twist them.
|
|
|
|
Post by fallenhero on Nov 30, 2007 17:29:14 GMT -5
how can you continue to defend this ppv? it is the worst card, by far, this year. How the did I defend the card with that? I said "Shut up about no singles men matches because you got it" Explain to me how that is defending a card? It's not. I was just saying shut up about no singles matches because you got it.. that's it. But, of course people take my words & twist them. Your response is a piss poor defense of it. Whether you think it is or not, you defended it by saying they had a singles match and telling them to shut up about it. They bashed it, you defended it. More to the point, this is one of the worst PPV cards I've ever seen. |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Nov 30, 2007 17:54:38 GMT -5
How the did I defend it? All I said was shut up about not getting a singles mens match because you got it then said the match.. that's not defending it.. |
|
