|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on May 11, 2008 0:41:50 GMT -5
So once again, the women's match outdid the men and even outdid the main event on this past week's Impact. Man I gotta say that them doing an all Knockout's impact special might even draw more ratings. Hell let another wardrobe malfunction occur and I'll be a fan for life What do you guys think of them possibly doing an entire two hour tournament style women's Impact just to see what the ratings would be?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 25, 2024 23:46:52 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2008 3:14:09 GMT -5
So once again, the women's match outdid the men and even outdid the main event on this past week's Impact. Man I gotta say that them doing an all Knockout's impact special might even draw more ratings. Hell let another wardrobe malfunction occur and I'll be a fan for life What do you guys think of them possibly doing an entire two hour tournament style women's Impact just to see what the ratings would be? Two hours might push it, but considering how many, it may the one of their best. TNA knows how to book the women. Why in the world can't they book the men right? Might as well make TNA an all women's corp, blend with Shimmer, and call it a day if things like this happen.
|
|
|
Post by Heresy on May 11, 2008 9:55:15 GMT -5
I don't get the hype over TNA's women's division... Amazing Kong and ODB? Yay, I guess. Roxxi? Umm, ok, cool. Love and Sky? Tits and ass, big deal. Gail Kim? Yawn.
|
|
|
Post by CBT on May 11, 2008 9:55:43 GMT -5
2 Hours may be a bit much, not complaining, they just don't want to draw away those on the fence.
TNA is well aware of their positive success, the new commercial spotlighting the Knockouts is a precursor for more acknowledgement come the press releases.
|
|
|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on May 11, 2008 14:01:08 GMT -5
I don't get the hype over TNA's women's division... Amazing Kong and ODB? Yay, I guess. Roxxi? Umm, ok, cool. Love and Sky? Tits and ass, big deal. Gail Kim? Yawn. Yeah I agree. I don't see why those matches get such high ratings but for some reason they do.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 25, 2024 23:46:52 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2008 15:59:30 GMT -5
Velvet Sky and Angelina Love are both very hot and can wrestle, but TNA doesn't let them show it off because of their ditzy gimmick.
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on May 11, 2008 16:02:23 GMT -5
What "ditzy" gimmick? I have yet to see anything "ditzy" about them.
|
|
B-Radimus Prime
Main Eventer
R.I.P. Luna :(
Joined on: Jun 20, 2006 21:37:05 GMT -5
Posts: 2,572
|
Post by B-Radimus Prime on May 11, 2008 18:15:35 GMT -5
Velvet Sky and Angelina Love are both very hot and can wrestle, but TNA doesn't let them show it off because of their ditzy gimmick. Velvet Sky cannot wrestle. She's been working the Indies for years and she still can't even put on a much better match than Christy Hemme. Angelina, however, is a completely different story. She's an awesome wrestler. I think their women's division is great, not nearly as good as the Shimmer product, but it definitely makes a nice alternative to a certain company who never takes their women seriously. Amazing Kong, Gail Kim, ODB, Roxxie, Angelina, Jackie, Melissa, and Daizee Haze are some of the best out there. I'd love to see a two hour tournament. It would probably be the highest rated Impact in a long time.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 25, 2024 23:46:52 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2008 22:42:10 GMT -5
What "ditzy" gimmick? I have yet to see anything "ditzy" about them. Aren't they playing two stuck-up ditzes? I think if TNA gave them a chance they can put on good matches. Oh and if TNA Impact was a two hour show with all womens matches, it would be the first complete Impact I watched in awhile.
|
|
|
Post by James St. James on May 12, 2008 1:06:29 GMT -5
Their matches are very stiff and I appreciate it. When they throw elbows, they're really hitting each other in the face. They are all very good sellers too, I've gotten used to WWE's diva overselling and not connecting, so it is a nice contrast. I can be completely enveloped in a TNA Knockouts match and forget that its fake, where as with WWE I am talking to my TV about how bad Ashley sucks at her job.
I also think that the "David and Goliath" device in wrestling can be very good if done correctly. There have been classic giants feuds (Andre The Giant/Hulk Hogan) and some crappy ones (Khali/Cena, Show/Mayweather) and I think Gail/Kong is going to go down as a huge feud in womens wrestling history.
|
|
|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on May 12, 2008 1:21:49 GMT -5
Oh well, I still say that maybe giving them one hour of impact to do a semi tournament of sorts might work out.
|
|
|
Post by Lewscher on May 12, 2008 5:35:33 GMT -5
just look at my sigs lol... but anyway i like the tna's lady division more than wwe cause i mean imo maria is the best one for looks like but all wwe divas can wrestle but some tna's imo are a bit more pretty but over all wwe wins in mainstream but imo tna =D
|
|
|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on May 12, 2008 11:03:27 GMT -5
I am pretty sure that WWE has great talent, but at the same time I really don't think that some of the WWE divas are hotter.
|
|