|
|
Post by wspaman1313 on May 12, 2008 17:04:42 GMT -5
Do YOU like this name?
WWF 2.0.
Do YOU like this name?
|
|
|
|
Post by (=wwefan617=) on May 12, 2008 17:10:54 GMT -5
uuummm not really. it seems to lack originality. And it makes me believe the fed will be nothing but a WWF/WWE carbon copy. If you like it than cool, but I would try to come up with something totally different so you wouldnt be affiliated with the WWE.
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on May 12, 2008 17:12:34 GMT -5
no I dont
|
|
|
|
Post by mck on May 12, 2008 17:13:15 GMT -5
Nope.
|
|
|
|
Post by wspaman1313 on May 12, 2008 18:25:51 GMT -5
Ok.Thanks for the replies guys.
|
|
|
|
Post by gatornuggets on May 12, 2008 19:35:22 GMT -5
Wow,generic
|
|
Villa
Main Eventer
BEAST
Joined on: Mar 11, 2007 3:30:15 GMT -5
Posts: 1,942
|
Post by Villa on May 13, 2008 4:55:09 GMT -5
No I don't  No I don't |
|
|
|
Post by armstrongistheone on May 13, 2008 18:38:13 GMT -5
nooooo
|
|
|
|
Post by greenjack1992 on May 14, 2008 14:24:08 GMT -5
Erm...
I think the problem is you're being very blatent in basing your fed on WWE.
No I don't like it, it's okay to use an existing fed out there as a stimulous or template but you need to be more discrete about it.
|
|
|
|
Post by wspaman1313 on May 14, 2008 18:41:41 GMT -5
OK.Please lock.
|
|
