Pay Per View = Too many to view

I think thats one of the reasons people dont really care who's feuding.

I mean.. very three weeks or thereabouts theres a new PPV, meaning that we have:

1) lots of short feuds that nobody cares about because its hard to even remember them when they'er over

2) Long drawn out feuds that have the same match over and over and over again (seems to be happening these days)


So either way it gets dull fast. But WWE won't get rid of them as long as they keep getting money from them, so we have no choice other than to settle with them.

They definitely are a problem though.

If you look back to when there was only four events a year (Rumble, Mania, Summerslam, Survivor Series) the cards were a big deal. Matches had been hugely hyped up, and we didnt see the people wrestling over and over and over again, so it was a big deal that they'd be wrestling at a PPV. This is also why (in my opinion) people cared more about the Intercontinental and tag team chamoionships.


If WWE are gonna force tha tmany PPV's down our throat each year, they should at least enforce the draft, and designate x amount of PPV's to each show and leave it at that.

I just feel sorry for those parents who buy every PPV for their kids. I hardly spend anything on WWE pay-per-views in comparison to some others. I only order the Royal Rumble, WrestleMania, SummerSlam and Survivor Series.

Eh, I only order Royal Rumbles and Wrestlemanias, maybe I will do the other big two,maybe...

Let's just say, that I haven't ordered a PPV on television, since last years WM(23) and that is still the only event I order each year(except I went to it this year).

I do agreed with you. The PPV seem like as just threw in match card latest, which I doesn't like that.

I prefer Brand PPV, like as half pf PPV belong to RAW, and other half to Smackdown! and mixed PPV at 4 of PPV per year (Royal Rumble, WrestleMania, SummerSlam and Survivor Series)

So we will see more talents matches. Because there was no room for talents wrestlers to have an matches if we got mixed PPV, sadly.

man you guys are ing hyprocits you bitch about wwe having a pvv every mounth yet you don't bitch about the ufc or tha doing they exact same thing bunch of cock sucking hyprocits you people are.

It has almost become commonplace for monthly ppv's ever since 1995-96 when the In Your House events were introduced, so I don't think they're going anywhere anytime soon.

I agree that there should only be 5 or 6 ppv's each year, but it's all about the income for WWE. Also, with all of short attention spans watching at home or sitting in the arena seats, I don't think lengthy feuds work the same anymore. With the exception of the main event, most feuds end in a couple of weeks and don't allow them to be extended like they would during the early '90s, 80s and before then. I also think weekly television shows have changed the dynamic of pay-per-view events and the time between them as there is much more exposure for feuds than there ever has been in the past.

Now, I don't buy every WWE ppv (in fact, I only usually buy 2 or 3 per-year), but if people are willing to pay the prices, than by all means, let them. I'm sure WWE won't object to receiving more money each month.

I dont really have a problem with there being too many, just the price tag with it. To me its almost like they do only have them every 2 months because i only have the money to buy every other PPV.