|
|
Post by chumped on May 23, 2008 15:57:54 GMT -5
Yeah, it's ridiculous. Backlash, Judgment Day, and One Night Stand are entirely too close to each other.
|
|
|
|
Post by spacejam on May 23, 2008 17:01:51 GMT -5
6 PPVs is really all need, but 12-14 from a business standpoint is smart
|
|
|
|
Post by Flyrfn144 on May 23, 2008 17:13:21 GMT -5
6 PPVs is really all need, but 12-14 from a business standpoint is smart It's things like this that make their wrestlers burnt out though. They overwork them. Don't just look at it from our standpoint, and WWE shouldn't look at the money standpoint either. Their wrestlers are overworked, and 2 less PPVs a year may not make a huge difference, but could still make some kind of difference. |
|
|
|
Post by The Funniest Guy in Pants on May 23, 2008 18:09:07 GMT -5
I think that they should stop doing some of their PPVs, however if they went back to the "In Your House style" with all every other PPV costing $15 - $20 and being an hour shorter
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 12, 2024 13:21:14 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2008 18:21:50 GMT -5
I think that they should stop doing some of their PPVs, however if they went back to the "In Your House style" with all every other PPV costing $15 - $20 and being an hour shorter If they wanted to be really smart, they'd make 'em cheaper, and put them on some other time than a night before school. I can't tell you how many times I couldn't get a PPV because one of those two reasons. |
|
|
|
Post by OmegaGaijin on May 23, 2008 19:53:05 GMT -5
i would prefer it if they went back to how it used to be,but money talks.i can just remember how excited i used to get for the big 5 when i was younger,it ment so much more
|
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on May 23, 2008 20:44:13 GMT -5
In all honesty, I just see it as a way for the WWE to bring in more $$$ because quite frankly thats pretty much the only disadvantage. Im not saying have long feuds between everyone but ones of decent length should be had so they can become memorable. These days basically none but long main event feuds are memorable.
Also PPV prices are insane. You americans pay the highest I believe.We pay less here in Aus and when i say less i mean significantly less particularly WM.
|
|
|
|
Post by fearthemonster on May 23, 2008 22:13:58 GMT -5
Well vince really doent care as long as he gets the $money$
|
|
|
|
Post by thepeopleschamp on May 23, 2008 22:19:02 GMT -5
well there is olny 14 a year so it's not to bad they just need to be spaced better and mabey make it 12 a year
|
|
|
|
Post by thepeopleschamp on May 23, 2008 22:28:22 GMT -5
Well vince really doent care as long as he gets the $money$ no he dosnet want the $money$ he wants the MONAAAYYY!  |
|
|
|
Post by TeamExtreme718x on May 23, 2008 23:02:09 GMT -5
Yea there are way to many PPVS..
|
|
Too Sweet
Main Eventer
R.I.P MJ
Joined on: Sept 20, 2006 23:28:07 GMT -5
Posts: 3,611
|
Post by Too Sweet on May 24, 2008 0:16:11 GMT -5
I really just get Wrestlemania and Royal Rumble, and Big TNA PPV's like Bound for Glory and Slammiversary don't really get all the rest, they just feel like a longer weekly show.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Funniest Guy in Pants on May 24, 2008 1:04:37 GMT -5
I think that they should stop doing some of their PPVs, however if they went back to the "In Your House style" with all every other PPV costing $15 - $20 and being an hour shorter Wow.. I didn't realized that I posted an incomplete though. I have no idea how that happened.  What I meant to say was that I wouldn't mind it if they went back to the IYH style of PPVs, with every other PPV being short and cheaper. |
|
|
|
Post by Dan on May 24, 2008 4:14:52 GMT -5
I hate how because there's so many PPVs, there's endless rematches in fueds, only with a different stipulation each time around.
Back in 2000, 2001, it was rare for 2 wrestlers to have a rivalry that went past one PPV, and when Austin V Kurt Angle did, it was brilliant, as no rivalry hardly ever had that much detail, and it was fresh.
Nowadays it's just too much, and having this many PPVs really affects the Raw and Smackdown Ratings.
|
|
chokeslamcena
Main Eventer
Anyone got the old SmackDown "minitron" graphics?
Joined on: Mar 22, 2008 12:36:02 GMT -5
Posts: 3,840
|
Post by chokeslamcena on May 24, 2008 9:47:27 GMT -5
I think that they should stop doing some of their PPVs, however if they went back to the "In Your House style" with all every other PPV costing $15 - $20 and being an hour shorter Wow.. I didn't realized that I posted an incomplete though. I have no idea how that happened. What I meant to say was that I wouldn't mind it if they went back to the IYH style of PPVs, with every other PPV being short and cheaper. But... thats what you did say isn't it? |
|
|
|
Post by juggarnautmofo on May 24, 2008 13:45:08 GMT -5
The should drop it to 5 a year (Royal Rumble in Jan, Wrestlemania in March/April, King of The Ring in July, SummerSlam in August and Survivor Series in Nov) then fill in the rest of the time with made for TV events like Saturday Nights Main Event or bring back Clash of the Champions If they were to do that, they would end up increaseing the prices of the PPV's. I think they should just go back to brand specific PPV's it was way better off that way, because now the storylines and the feuds do lake and on the PPV's a lot of top guys or getting left off the show, i mean jesus half the card on some PPV's r filled with heavyweight title matches there really is no midcard anymore haha |
|
|
|
Post by Quanthor on May 24, 2008 15:06:51 GMT -5
They need to be cut in half - period.
|
|
