Stewart
Superstar
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png)
Joined on: Oct 21, 2007 17:14:43 GMT -5
Posts: 616
|
Post by Stewart on Jun 8, 2008 18:29:21 GMT -5
![](http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd14/mixmastamic/normal_Rocky_Training.png) Yeah first ever head mod was a success, Jaw swaps are easy...
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Aug 20, 2024 12:03:13 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 8, 2008 18:34:05 GMT -5
Not Bad.
Teeth look wierd, though.
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Jun 8, 2008 18:34:42 GMT -5
I don't like it. It just seems squashed and blured. and the tones dont match from the top half to the bottom. Just looks too squashed and werid.
The flames are alright though.part from going over the joints, they look on the figure and decent.
|
|
|
Post by Cass on Jun 8, 2008 19:18:04 GMT -5
there is nothing wrong with them over the joints as the joint still shows through.
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Jun 9, 2008 4:05:44 GMT -5
there is nothing wrong with them over the joints as the joint still shows through. But realisticly, on the figure the paint dosn't go OVER the joints does it? No It dosn't. The knees are correct, but the arms, and where the torso joins the legs,looks bad. Specily the right arm, where the it goes over the joints, and you can bearly see it.
|
|
|
Post by Cass on Jun 9, 2008 6:13:37 GMT -5
It does sometimes.
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Jun 9, 2008 6:33:07 GMT -5
Not realisticly it shouldn't. Panting over the joints, especialy on the torso/legs join isn't going to look good on a figure, is it?
|
|
|
Post by [MJH] on Jun 9, 2008 6:43:18 GMT -5
if you look at a lot of protos you'll see that most designs go over the joints and if you look at figures you'll see that most designs are continued under the joints rather than abruptly ended, erasing the logo at the joints makes the figure joints look sharp edged and brittle rather than round edged, you shouldnt be erase any parts of the logo but simpley just making it darker wt the parts where it goes over joints. One person mentioned this joint thing once and it's gone out of proportion because it's really not a big deal.
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Jun 9, 2008 6:57:46 GMT -5
if you look at a lot of protos you'll see that most designs go over the joints and if you look at figures you'll see that most designs are continued under the joints rather than abruptly ended, erasing the logo at the joints makes the figure joints look sharp edged and brittle rather than round edged, you shouldnt be erase any parts of the logo but simpley just making it darker wt the parts where it goes over joints. One person mentioned this joint thing once and it's gone out of proportion because it's really not a big deal. Well you pretty much proved my point. The logos arn't darkend on this figure, you can still clearly see the logo over the joints, specialy on the right arm, it looks like there is no join there. I never said the logo should be deleted from where it goes over the joints, i just said it goes OVER the joints,which it does and it shouldnt as much as it does. No matter what i seem to post about figures here, when it try to help people, people still moan about what i put. Im simpyl trying to help him, because imo they shouldnt go over the joints as much as that.
|
|
|
Post by cjs. on Jun 9, 2008 15:21:43 GMT -5
I don't understand the attire, but it does look dope. (Y)
|
|
|
Post by catsarefunny on Jun 9, 2008 17:01:57 GMT -5
Yeah, great job - looks like it could be a real prototype. ![:)](http://www.wrestlingfigs.com/images/smiley.gif)
|
|